South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Laugh all you want, Edward. Hope your decision to take short cuts won't ruin you in the end.
Jeez effed up my back with deadlifts. Excellent lesson don't try to go too heavy to quickly. But I did do a pb of 155kg
Congrats on setting a PB! It's not about the weight: regardless if it was 30Kg or 200Kg, if it's a PB for you, it means YOU are progressing.
I find it essential to have someone watch my form when going for PB's. The moment something is off, they say something or start spotting/assisting. Speedy recovery with the back.
And if you're not natural? Can all of that be ignored?
To not be average.So you don't deny using steroids?
Edit:
Yeah, the following posts pretty much confirm it. Why do it? Do you compete?
To not be average.
I am planning on competing at the beginning of 2018. I was prepping for the Boksburg Classic this past weekend but pulled out of the show.
Don't worry, I won't lose any sleep over itI have lost respect for what you have achieved.
I have lost respect for what you have achieved.
Don't worry, I won't lose any sleep over it
Why does body building need to be tested? It isn't a sport where the winner is determined by who can run the fastest or throw a ball the farthest. That's like saying that beauty pageants need to be regulated and tested for any form of cosmetic enhancements or changes to the entrants appearances which can't be achieved naturally.
If someone wants to compete naturally then he/she should compete in a natural/tested federation. The IFBB isn't for him/her then.
Also, would you have the same views if the use of PEDs without a prescription was legal?
Jirre, like anyone really gives a fck. :crylaugh:
You are probably one of those people that think steroids are a shortcut.
They're definitely not a shortcut. A shortcut implies that they're just a quicker/easier route to a desired outcome.
I do.
I don't even classify BBers who compete in BB competitions as athletes... Competing at actual lifting is another story however.
They're definitely not a shortcut. A shortcut implies that they're just a quicker/easier route to a desired outcome.
And I agree on that definition. I have no doubt you work hard and put in the time and effort - just as much as non-steroid users. However, your gains will be faster, which fits into your definition of a shortcut.
Your opinion from here on is worthless.
Jirre, like anyone really gives a fck. :crylaugh:
The gains on AAS are definitely achievable faster, provided you put in the work and effort. However the physiques achievable are also far beyond what is achievable naturally. That's why they are used, not just to get to the end point sooner, but to surpass it.
I'd hope no one would use just to look like the average Men's Health cover model.
The gains on AAS are definitely achievable faster, provided you put in the work and effort. However the physiques achievable are also far beyond what is achievable naturally. That's why they are used, not just to get to the end point sooner, but to surpass it.
I'd hope no one would use just to look like the average Men's Health cover model.
Steroids are often associated with professional athletes and bodybuilders, but a January 2017 paper published in JAMA reports that 2.9 million to 4 million people in the U.S. have used anabolic steroids at some point in their life, and that nearly all of them are men. What's more, about 1 million American men have become dependent on steroids, using high doses for years, according to the paper.
...and won't have any of those nagging doubts about how much the drugs (or enhancements as you call them) contributed... Not worth the risk imo.