The Middle East Conflict Thread

marine1 said:
You are a angry little anti Semite :rolleyes:
Thank god there are many more like him waiting to fight against the terrorists. ;)
You should be banned.
Did you learn that from the Nazi's?
Click to expand...

Lol he made those comments, I made mine.
Hardly any different to the names you used against Muslim leaders.

Heres another dirty little zionist pig... Better?
"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls."
-- Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) Yitzhak Shamir in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
Click to expand...
 
daveza said:
If we banned everyone who was an anti-semite, anti-muslim or
anti-black/anc there would be hardly anyone left.

It's hardly fair to throw toys out over those who don't support the one side which for example refers to children and women as potential butchers.

It's no more a crime to be anti-semitic or anti-muslim than to be anti-whitney.
Click to expand...

Sem⋅ite
   /ˈsɛmaɪt or, especially Brit., ˈsimaɪt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sem-ahyt or, especially Brit., see-mahyt] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs.
2. a Jew.


This is why i LMAO when jews claim arabs are antisemite because aside from religious absurdity there is that.
 
Xarog said:
Thankyou for admitting that you have been exhibiting puerile behaviour and that you think no one should bother debating with you. Please leave the thread at your earliest convenience and allow the rest of us to get on with it.
Click to expand...

You are twisting my words. I said there is no point in debating with you, as you will not concede if you are wrong. I have proven that this morning.

I can prove you wrong again, but what is the point?
 
Last edited:
JK8 said:
"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls."
-- Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) Yitzhak Shamir in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
Click to expand...

Yeah marine1 what's your view on this? remember there are Palestinian Christians too or is it only acceptable when aimed at Muslims?
 
“Even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expel and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care.”

Ariel Sharon quote
Click to expand...

Dont delete relevant posts Bwana!
If you want to cry for writing Dirty *** ill RBP everyone of your stupid posts, watch those adjectives lol...
 
Typical... clearly the pro-Israel supporters are all Muslim haters, I mention the Palestinian Christians and now they are quiet.
 
I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child's existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian woman is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do.
Ariel Sharon
Click to expand...

:eek:
I dont care what Bwana says or does, my opinion still stands!!
 
Aqua_lung said:
Typical... clearly the pro-Israel supporters are all Muslim haters, I mention the Palestinian Christians and now they are quiet.
Click to expand...
Like these cristians:

Christians living in Gaza City on Monday appealed to the international community to protect them against increased attacks by Muslim extremists.
Click to expand...

Link
 
Last edited:
BrandonH said:
And yet thousands of rockets are still fired by hamas. As I said before, if all those rockets only make up 10% of their activities I'd expect the other 90% to actually involve improving gaza. Which clearly hasnt happened.
Click to expand...
So apparently you know better than one of the most influentual organisations in America, with millions of dollars at their disposal to do research into this kind of thing. :rolleyes:


Which has nothing to do with anything.
Click to expand...
I couldn't agree more.

So now can you please explain why you thought it was relevant to bring up in the first place?


If they did that then hamas would be sprouting propaganda saying they defeated israel so it is obviously out of the question. And besides, the UN has called for hamas to stop firing rockets and they havent.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:


http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapter1.shtml

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
Click to expand...
Or to put it in plain(er) english : By signing this document you agree that you are legally bound under international law to respect the borders of other nations, and that you will not use force or threaten to use force to undermine the existence of those nations.

Really out of the question, hey?

Perhaps on paper, but in the real world things are more complicated as I said above.
Click to expand...
So now you actually admit the possibility of something you denied two sentences earlier? :confused:

And whether or not something is "complicated" is irrelevant. You tried to justify Israel's actions on the premise that it is acceptable to aquire terrory through warfare. The very existence of the UN runs counter to that principle, and Israel as a member of the UN and a signatory of the UN charter has agreed to conduct itself in a manner in keeping with the aims of the charter, including the idea that it is unacceptable to grab land. Your argument failed. Accept that you are wrong.


Regardless, they were allied to israels enemies.
Click to expand...
Source?

Because they know their outdated army would crushed in a matter of days by south korea and her allies. Which is what the palestinians would be wise to remember.
Click to expand...
Lol. 20% of North Korea's population is part of the NK army, and it even causes the US to balk at the idea of invading the country. But even if that weren't the case, then why doesn't South Korea attack North Korea for having troops on the border? :rolleyes:

An example of one such country would be helpful.
Click to expand...
Why bother? You'll probably just claim scepticism at the source and ignore the example anyway. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
BBSA said:
You are twisting my words. I said there is no point in debating with you, as you will not concede if you are wrong. I have proven that this morning.

I can prove you wrong again, but what is the point?
Click to expand...
And I said that I was not admitting any such thing because you had not admitted where you were wrong. So until you man up and admit your mistakes, I see no reason to treat you with the respect you refuse to show others.
 
BBSA said:
Like these cristians:



Link
Click to expand...

They are targeted by Jewish extremists too if there is land they want to grab... fact is that Jews, Muslims and Christians have been living together quite peacefully until the Israel thing was forced on them.
 
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3653936,00.html

An example of the imbalance -

Two rockets landed in the southern city of Beersheba at around 7:20 am Sunday, only a few second after an air raid siren sounded in the city. One of the rockets hit an open area inside the city.

There were no injuries, but Magen David Adom emergency services treated four people for shock. A car and a building sustained damage. An electric pole collapsed and the power supply to the area was cut. Another rocket caused damage in a different part of the city.

Ronit, who lives in the area hit by the rocket, said the entire neighborhood trembled. "There was one big boom. There's no electricity on the street now. The shutters moved after the pole fell on a car. There's a great commotion here: Police, ambulances and firefighters.
Click to expand...

Come on.

Oh my , an electric pole collapsed, the shutters moved and there's no electricity on the street ! Wow!

http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/ap_gaza_03_081230_ssh.jpg

http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/nm_palestine_4_081231_ssh.jpg

http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/rt_gaza_strip_2_090104_ssh.jpg
 
JK8 said:
:eek:
I dont care what Bwana says or does, my opinion still stands!!
Click to expand...
What that you are an anti Semite? Posting drivel like you did should get you banned permanenntly it is hate speech and will be taking it up with RPM. You guys have Frankie banned for something small and then you have the audacity to post hate speech like that and think it will go unpunished?
Posting what you posted is clearly hate speech.
 
daveza said:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3653936,00.html

An example of the imbalance -



Come on.

Oh my , an electric pole collapsed, the shutters moved and there's no electricity on the street ! Wow!

http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/ap_gaza_03_081230_ssh.jpg

http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/nm_palestine_4_081231_ssh.jpg

http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/rt_gaza_strip_2_090104_ssh.jpg
Click to expand...


Thats not the point, rockets were fired with the intention to kill...

Maybe Israel should start blind folding their F16 fighter pilots before they hit the "FIRE" button to balance things out:)
 
hate speech - Bigoted speech attacking or disparaging a social or ethnic group or a member of such a group.

You can hardly claim the pro-Israeli members here are innocent.
 
BBSA said:
I can prove you wrong again, but really what is the point?
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:

Here's an analogy of what you've done :

Person A bumps into Person B. Person A does not apologise. Later, person B bumps into Person A. Person A demands he apologise. Person B says he will do so when person A apologises for bumping into Person B. Person A then replies that there's no point because Person B won't apologise for bumping into Person A.


Now if you really can prove me wrong, by all means go ahead and do it. Otherwise grow a pair and admit you were wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X