The Middle East Conflict Thread

Aqua_lung said:
I prefer wikipedia thanks.
Click to expand...

Shame, did the wittle post break your argument? FAIL.

You do know that wikipedia is written by the public at large and can contain large tracts of inaccurate information. But then you'd have to have written academic papers to know not to quote wikipedia.
 
timgaul said:
Shame, did the wittle post break your argument? FAIL.

You do know that wikipedia is written by the public at large and can contain large tracts of inaccurate information. But then you'd have to have written academic papers to know not to quote wikipedia.
Click to expand...

It has references if you have any doubts on authenticity. At least it's safe from bias unlike your site owned by the ZOA.
 
Aqua_lung said:
I prefer wikipedia thanks.

That site is owned by the Zionist Organization of America if you do a 'who is' so no doubt it will have bias/twist facts. lol
Click to expand...

In the past, this was interpreted to mean that JNF should not lease land to non-Jews, but the restriction was frequently circumvented in practice, for example, by granting one-year lease to Bedouins for pastures.
Click to expand...

In January 2005, Israel's Attorney General Menachem Mazuz ruled in response to a Supreme Court petition that lease restrictions violated Israeli anti-discrimination laws. In June 2005, the government accepted the Gadish Committee’s recommendations without signing a formal agreement.
Click to expand...

wiki

Backs up my argument don't you think?

EDIT: is Wikipedia also owned by the Zionist Organization of America?
 
Last edited:
timgaul said:
wiki

Backs up my argument don't you think?

EDIT: is Wikipedia also owned by the Zionist Organization of America?
Click to expand...


I got flamed earlier for posting a wiki link that was not neutral, this link you posted is inaccurate and unbalanced.

Even in the link above they speak about leases, I cant see a clear answer on ownership!
 
timgaul said:
Backs up my argument don't you think?
Click to expand...

If you think for one moment (or are saying) that Israel is going to allow an Arab/Palestinian majority in its citizenry, then:

1. You are self delusional OR
2. You are just punting Israeli propaganda and I suggest contacting your Ministry and ask them for stuff more credible OR
3. You think we are complete morons and are going to believe it.

If you aren't thinking or saying that, then:

1. Admit that Israel allows such a group as citizens for propaganda purposes only AND
2. Admit that they are treated differently under Israeli law AND
3. Admit that Israel is practising apartheid by creating ghettos and bantustans so as to ensure an ongoing Jewish/Zionist majority.
 
AvOk said:
I got flamed earlier for posting a wiki link that was not neutral, this link you posted is inaccurate and unbalanced.

Even in the link above they speak about leases, I cant see a clear answer on ownership!
Click to expand...

You asked for a wikipedia link, I've given you one. Now you complain about wikipedia being biased, this is your request not mine - don't ask if you don't want it. Sounds like the desperate rantings of a dying argument. Which part of "You do know that wikipedia is written by the public at large and can contain large tracts of inaccurate information. But then you'd have to have written academic papers to know not to quote wikipedia." was difficult to comprehend?

I have already given you a link about Arab ownership.

Again, wiki:

Of the entire area of the State of Israel only about 300,000-400,000 dunums -- apart from the desolate rocky area of the southern Negev, at present quite unfit for cultivation -- are State Domain which the Israeli Government took over from the Mandatory regime. The J.N.F. and private Jewish owners possess under two million dunums. Almost all the rest belongs at law to Arab owners.
Click to expand...

EDIT: you know what then, you prove to me that Arabs can't buy land in Israel.
 
Last edited:
marine1 said:
Got to love the "peaceful" Arabs supporters :rolleyes:

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2449141,00.html

A group of some 500 later turned violent, burning Israeli flags, torching cars and vandalising several shops, police said.

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2449145,00.html

Israel need to see this through until every last rocket is destroyed and every last Hamas terrorist is brought to their knees
Click to expand...

See what violence Israel's latest actions have created!
:eek:
 
rwenzori said:
If you think for one moment (or are saying) that Israel is going to allow an Arab/Palestinian majority in its citizenry, then:

1. You are self delusional OR
2. You are just punting Israeli propaganda and I suggest contacting your Ministry and ask them for stuff more credible OR
3. You think we are complete morons and are going to believe it.

If you aren't thinking or saying that, then:

1. Admit that Israel allows such a group as citizens for propaganda purposes only AND
2. Admit that they are treated differently under Israeli law AND
3. Admit that Israel is practising apartheid by creating ghettos and bantustans so as to ensure an ongoing Jewish/Zionist majority.
Click to expand...

All your biased opinion /ignore

I'm not going to debate with you until you bring facts and not just your one-sided opinions to the table.
 
timgaul said:
wiki

Backs up my argument don't you think?

EDIT: is Wikipedia also owned by the Zionist Organization of America?
Click to expand...
Ok, but this is to do with the negev desert, hardly 'land'...
In June 2005, the government accepted the Gadish Committee’s recommendations without signing a formal agreement.
Click to expand...

but keep up with the times...
In July 2007, the Israeli Knesset approved the Jewish National Fund Bill, submitted by MK Uri Ariel (National Unity/National Religious Party), in its preliminary reading; the bill sought to authorize the JNF practice of refusing to lease land to Arab citizens.
Click to expand...
Ok so the court had a say but it's still not fair now is it...
However, several months later, the High Court heard an Adalah petition seeking cancellation of an ILA policy as well as Article 27 of the Regulations of the Obligations of Tenders, which in concert prevent Arab citizens from participating in bids for JNF-controlled land.[42] The High Court of Justice agreed to delay a ruling by at least four months, and a temporary settlement was reached wherein although the JNF would be prevented from discriminating on grounds of ethnicity, nevertheless every time land is sold to a non-Jew, the ILA would compensate it with an equivalent amount of land, thus ensuring the total amount of land owned by Jewish Israelis remains the same.[3]
Click to expand...

wiki
 
timgaul said:
I give you reams and reams of quotes and links and all you can say is "you're deluded".

Try give a mature argument because I'm am done conversing on your level.
Click to expand...

I give you piles and piles of facts that you ignore.

Try give a mature argument because I'm am done conversing on your level.
:p:p
 
timgaul said:
You asked for a wikipedia link, I've given you one. Now you complain about wikipedia being biased, this is your request not mine - don't ask if you don't want it. Sounds like the desperate rantings of a dying argument. Which part of "You do know that wikipedia is written by the public at large and can contain large tracts of inaccurate information. But then you'd have to have written academic papers to know not to quote wikipedia." was difficult to comprehend?

I have already given you a link about Arab ownership.

Again, wiki:



EDIT: you know what then, you prove to me that Arabs can't buy land in Israel.
Click to expand...

OI, it was aqua who asked for a wiki link, I accepted the Israeli owned site you posted the first time! :D
 
AvOk said:
OI, it was aqua who asked for a wiki link, I accepted the Israeli owned site you posted the first time! :D
Click to expand...

Sorry, my apologies, a bit confused.

But yes, unfortunately those are the best links I can give to satisfy everyone. And yes the wiki link is under dispute, but its the only one :/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X