US Election 2020 - Pt 2

[konfab]

Donald Trump op-ed

Opinion | What I Saw at the Revolution (Published 2000)

Op-Ed article by Donald J Trump explains why he considered running for president, and why he decided to withdraw; says he thought America might be ready for businessman president, someone not part of 'inside the Beltway' buddy system; says he chose Reform Party because its nomination process...

www.nytimes.com

Trumpets in shambles.

Did you read this part?

When I held a reception for Reform Party leaders in California, the room was crowded with Elvis look-alikes, resplendent in various campaign buttons and anxious to give me a pamphlet explaining the Swiss-Zionist conspiracy to control America.

Well there goes the Trump is literally Hitler narrative.

Although I am totally comfortable with the people in the New York Independence Party, I leave the Reform Party to David Duke, Pat Buchanan and Lenora Fulani. That is not company I wish to keep.

Well there goes the Trump is a white supremacist narrative as well.

In the days before I decided to end my presidential exploratory effort, I was watching CNN and saw Vice President Gore trudging through the snow in subzero temperatures, knocking on doors in New Hampshire -- an obvious look of drudgery on his face. My experience was quite different. I had enormous fun thinking about a presidential candidacy and count it as one of my great life experiences

There is an interesting motivation I haven't thought of, the madman ran for president for the fun of it

https://archive.is/gPG74#selection-429.291-433.239

 

[Hamish McPanji]

Yeah. sure buddy. Look at my ostrich gif

Why would I wanna look at your self portrait.

 

[The_Right_Honourable_Brit]

So an (objectively) medically vulnerable Biden went to vote early in-person in the Delaware primary yesterday...now about that nonsense that voting in-person would be a life or death decision...

 

[konfab]

So an (objectively) medically vulnerable Biden went to vote early in-person in the Delaware primary yesterday...now about that nonsense that voting in-person would be a life or death decision...

Having a mostly peaceful protest where you peacefully steal other people's property = no covid-19 risk.
Waiting in a single line in the fresh air = covid-19 risk.

People have been going to Walmart throughout the entire covid-19 pandemic. I highly doubt that going to cast your ballot in person is going to present any more of a risk than that.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

So an (objectively) medically vulnerable Biden went to vote early in-person in the Delaware primary yesterday...now about that nonsense that voting in-person would be a life or death decision...

A lot of people are more medically vulnerable than the guy running for president.

 

[rietrot]

In a free market system (which most of us peasants live in), you cannot be wealthy without being virtuous. You only get your wealth by providing value to other humans.

You want to challenge yourself and understand my perspective? Read this little bit from Atlas Shrugged.


https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/library/books/franciscos-money-speech-from-atlas-shrugged/

If only Ayn Rand was a better novelist. Her stuff are pure propaganda, even though it is mostly correct.

 

[rietrot]

I am aware of that. However, some people do become rich off the backs of poor working folk. Nothing virtuous about that.

Slavery was stopped in the early 1800s. It has been illegal to force people to work if they don't want to for at least 200 years.

 

[cerebus]

So an (objectively) medically vulnerable Biden went to vote early in-person in the Delaware primary yesterday...now about that nonsense that voting in-person would be a life or death decision...

Sorry what’s the problem with absentee voting?

 

[cerebus]

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

 

[Kieppie]

Why would I wanna look at your self portrait.

Ha ha ha.. Thought that up yourself did you? You must almost be seeing the light in there.
Not unexpected from someone suffering TDS. Lack of objectivity is the first thing to go.

Here is something for you.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305507519549394944

 

[Kieppie]

So an (objectively) medically vulnerable Biden went to vote early in-person in the Delaware primary yesterday...now about that nonsense that voting in-person would be a life or death decision...

He voted early because he was afraid hes vote might change post debates

 

[Kieppie]

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

Is that supposed to mean something? It's like saying Oprah endorsed Obama.

Oh I get it.. because it has the word "Science" in the title

 

[Kieppie]

Pro life you say?

Tell me more...

‘Like an Experimental Concentration Camp’: Whistleblower Complaint Alleges Mass Hysterectomies at ICE Detention Center

Pushing conspiracy theories now? Careful you might sound like those Qanon people.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

Ha ha ha.. Thought that up yourself did you? You must almost be seeing the light in there.
Not unexpected from someone suffering TDS. Lack of objectivity is the first thing to go.

Here is something for you.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305507519549394944

What's that got to do with the case fatality story I commented on, I have not a clue.

Maybe you should pull your head out. Might actually learn something

 

[Pegasus]

Yup...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305930782817517570

 

[Kieppie]

What's that got to do with the case fatality story I commented on, I have not a clue.

Maybe you should pull your head out. Might actually learn something

I think the one that is failing to learn anything is you. I posted some of the findings earlier, but since you only read headlines I guess you missed it. I has to do that your blinded to objectivity by TDS

The metric used was not in fact posed by any right-wing media outlet. But sure I'm the one that needs to learn something.

Here some more stuff you won't understand.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305692657692356608

 

[Grant]

That chart pretty much shows there is no correlation between lockdown policy and the resulting infections.

Sweden had no lockdown, no mandatory masks yet they have a lower death rate than countries that did those things.
Spain is George Floyding people who don't wear masks, yet they have a higher death rate.

the chart is not designed to compare lockdown policies, bootlegging of alcohol and cigarettes etc.
but lets look at glorious sweden, the land of no masks and no lockdown - the epitome of 1st word living:


and now 3rd world south africa, the land of poverty, electricity failures, drought . .masks and lockdown:

 

[The_Right_Honourable_Brit]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305946580244144128

(I've bet on Biden to win the first debate as it based on the CNN poll - Clinton won all 3 debates on that measure by double digits).

 

[OrbitalDawn]

I have discussed this on numerous occasions. Feel free to go back and look up my posting history. The entire thing is a conspiracy theory.

I have read the Senate report. It's a **** show. Have you? The fact that the Senate report comes to TWO VERY DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS seems to escape you. Have you read the Mueller report? Obviously you have not.

There was no collusion. There is no evidence anywhere. There was zero basis for ANY of the FISA warrants either. But keep banging that drum.

So again not gonna actually point to any actual incorrect reporting. Thought so.

Weird how that keeps happening.

It doesn't come to two different conclusions, at all.

"There is no evidence anywhere" <-- I mean, what even is this? You can't have read even 1 page of it if that's the conclusion you've come to. But you've been fed the talking points and will stick to them no matter what the evidence says, eh? Pure propaganda narrative

Reality: "The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary.

The report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identified as a “Russian intelligence officer.”

 

[lumeer]

To anyone who thinks that Russia was a hoax, here is Trump showing his true allegiance: