US Election 2020 - Pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Is that the facepalm for yourself as you characteristically wipe out the entire centre of political ideologies?

I guess when you become hyperpartisan, there is no centre?

Centre right people do vote Democrat at times. Many did so in 2016.

Your link was about which political party some college professors will vote for.

Do you have facts that support the claim that 99% of academia is left wing?

Edit - quoted from Emjay's study, which proves my point -

If Em could uncouple herself from the Ben Shapiro feeding tube she uses for information, she might have her mind blown looking at the asymmetry between party registration and party vote in places like West Virginia.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
More on the nakedly corrupt POS Trump installed to fsck up the postal service.

Louis DeJoy boosted his giving to Republican political campaigns as the job of U.S. Postmaster General became available, a researcher told Congress.

DeJoy, who now holds the position, gave President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee more than $600,000 over eight weeks after the opening was announced, Lisa Graves, executive director of True North Research, which investigates the influence of money on public policy, said in written testimony submitted to a panel of the House Oversight Committee in advance of a hearing Monday.

In the 2019-2020 cycle, DeJoy has given more than $1.5 million to GOP candidates and campaigns, the bulk of which has gone to aid Trump’s 2020 election strategy, Graves said.

Real time tracking in how he's slowed stuff down.

 

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
So again not gonna actually point to any actual incorrect reporting. Thought so.

Weird how that keeps happening.

It doesn't come to two different conclusions, at all.

"There is no evidence anywhere" <-- I mean, what even is this? You can't have read even 1 page of it if that's the conclusion you've come to. But you've been fed the talking points and will stick to them no matter what the evidence says, eh? Pure propaganda narrative

Reality: "The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary.

Those articles you listed previously said very little of import. It boils down to hearsay and conjecture. No actual agreement was found as also stated in that article. The burden of proof was not met.

Some issues:
  • The Fisa issues make a lot of evidence inadmissible. If the FBI failed on basic details like that what else did they fail at? This was mentioned in the emails being edited to omit Cater Page CIA informant status.
  • Using wikileaks equates to election meddling, but the "Steele dossier" was by a foreign agent so then that investigation should also be considered election meddling?
  • Business dealings with Russia even if someone was a Russian agent does not mean interference.
  • They viewed members as easily manipulated, yet found no evidence that they were.

The report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identified as a “Russian intelligence officer.”

You're just parroting what the article said.
So lets practice basic law here and you have to prove that there was interference instead of Emjay having to prove they are innocent.
 

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
More on the nakedly corrupt POS Trump installed to fsck up the postal service.



Real time tracking in how he's slowed stuff down.

More conspiracy theories? Trump didn't appoint someone to mess with the postal service.
You can make a case that someone is not the best pick over another candidate, but not that it was malicious.

Hope you're not one of those people believing Trump is stealing their mailboxes.
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,088
I think the one that is failing to learn anything is you. I posted some of the findings earlier, but since you only read headlines I guess you missed it. I has to do that your blinded to objectivity by TDS

The metric used was not in fact posed by any right-wing media outlet. But sure I'm the one that needs to learn something.

Here some more stuff you won't understand.

And what do you understand from that exactly? That case fatality rate matters more than death rate? That's some fancy footwork there to get to that conclusion.

There's a certain idiot who doesn't want to wear a mask, doesn't social distance, wants people to drink bleach and doesn't seem to have the basic knowledge that the average person has. That's the same guy who thinks case fatality rate is the gold standard, merely because it makes his numbers look better. Sorry, I'm not the acolyte of him the way you are. I prefer my own thoughts
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Trump admin wants to needlessly deport 400k legal migrants - hundreds of thousands of people who have lives, jobs, American children, homes etc., many having lived there for 20+ years.


The 'it's only about illegal immigrants!' garbage won't stop, though.
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,088
How (and who) are they determining who 'wins' a debate?
I personally think, the debates are a bit of asham. From Obama Vs Clinton time when they softballed Obama to the presidency.

I don't imagine any of the candidates this time would remember the name of the president/pm of Ukraine off the cuff , let alone the president of Scotland.

Essentially the debates are only a popularity contest of sorts. Going through them without gathering too much mud is the entire point of then
 

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
And what do you understand from that exactly? That case fatality rate matters more than death rate? That's some fancy footwork there to get to that conclusion.

There's a certain idiot who doesn't want to wear a mask, doesn't social distance, wants people to drink bleach and doesn't seem to have the basic knowledge that the average person has. That's the same guy who thinks case fatality rate is the gold standard, merely because it makes his numbers look better. Sorry, I'm not the acolyte of him the way you are. I prefer my own thoughts

Acolyte. Hah. I don't look up to people or believe they should be on a pedestal. Never have never will. Again it's your TDS speaking, so in a way yes you're his acolyte

Trump was most likely told by his advisors that, that metric is a better gauge for the Covid response. The fact that other people not even in the same camp as him supports this proves it. Whether you are able to grasp the concept is irrelevant. You're just upset that the USA is not at the bottom of the pile as that would fit your limited world view better.

Also you saying he said people should drink bleach proves you're incapable of rational thought. No wonder Tyson eagerly claps for you, probably the same maturity level. Go consult tarot cards or something.
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,088
Acolyte. Hah. I don't look up to people or believe they should be on a pedestal. Never have never will. Again it's your TDS speaking, so in a way yes you're his acolyte

Trump was most likely told by his advisors that, that metric is a better gauge for the Covid response. The fact that other people not even in the same camp as him supports this proves it. Whether you are able to grasp the concept is irrelevant. You're just upset that the USA is not at the bottom of the pile as that would fit your limited world view better.

Also you saying he said people should drink bleach proves you're incapable of rational thought. No wonder Tyson eagerly claps for you, probably the same maturity level. Go consult tarot cards or something.

Trump only cares about his ratings, and what makes him look good. He's made that clear, who are you to argue? Who are his advisors to argue?

Drink bleach, inject bleach....get it somehow in your body. Nobody knows wtf he was on about. It was cringeworthy, but not to his followers....somehow they magic-ed out what he meant. That pedestal you talk about, yeah..it's a thing, that all you lot worship at
 

Kieppie

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
9,239
Trump only cares about his ratings, and what makes him look good. He's made that clear, who are you to argue? Who are his advisors to argue?

Drink bleach, inject bleach....get it somehow in your body. Nobody knows wtf he was on about. It was cringeworthy, but not to his followers....somehow they magic-ed out what he meant. That pedestal you talk about, yeah..it's a thing, that all you lot worship at

No one said what he said made any sense. Although it turned out there were some experiments with bleach aerosols. Is that what he meant? Who knows, who cares. Again you fall into the "If you're not with us you're against us" Sounds very nazi'esque to me.

Just for interest sake is this you when you say something?

Ocjp.gif
 

lumeer

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
3,012
Have you heard what happened in Germany? Some fellow that Hitler. Knows how to treat his political opponents.
Josef Stalin on The Night of the Long Knives
Stalin would have been proud of Putin. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer, as they say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top