Pegasus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 13,973
A Ferrari is a luxury. Should a sick person without the financial means to afford treatment, be condemned to suffer and die?
How many sick people have you helped with your money?
A Ferrari is a luxury. Should a sick person without the financial means to afford treatment, be condemned to suffer and die?
The irony of this post is unfathomable
Each country is unique.
Have you actually done some homework and worked out how much all his promise going to cost?
How many sick people have you helped with your money?
By the taxes I pay, and through my medical aid contributions, I've made a small contribution to the treatment of many.
How many sick people have you helped with your money?
Their entitlement programs are already in a BIG hole, they just can not afford to provide more free stuff.Why, in principle, can't America, the most innovating country of all, do what most industrialised nations are already doing?
So nothing then?
How many walls have you paid for other people? OMG , Peggyboys social spending argument DESTROYED.
No, taxes and medical aid contributions, both of which I contribute to, get pooled into a big fund, so that sick people can receive treatments that they otherwise would not be able to afford.
How many walls have you paid for other people? OMG , Peggyboys social spending argument DESTROYED.
Would you be happy if say another 20 % of your income went to poor people?
Those who oppose social spending should, on principle, withdraw from medical aid schemes, insurance products, etc.
Why not? Should another 50% of your money go to the poor instead if 20 % is too low?
Or just other peoples money?
I think that you're misrepresenting the situation. The question is, why can't the US have social healthcare like most industrialised nations? No-one is saying that Americans must hand over all their money to their government.
In some sense, Americans are worse off than South Africans in this regard. In South Africa, a person without medical aid and unable to afford private treatment can receive treatment in a state hospital, whereas, to my knowledge, there is no analogue to a state hospital in America.
Yes, absolutely yes, a thousand times over if needs be. How is this even a question?!?Should a sick person without the financial means to afford treatment, be condemned to suffer and die?
Ok. So you want people to get free care but not with your money.
That's very charitable of you. Excellent virtue signalling.
You passed the socialist test.![]()
That's not what I wrote.
Yes, absolutely yes, a thousand times over if needs be. How is this even a question?!?
If you want to help a sick person without the financial means to afford treatment, guess what, you are free to do so with your own money. Leave mine the fahk alone.