Hosehead
Executive Member
1. The Stade de France does not have a tenant and is managed successfully.
2. Are you suggesting Stade de France are some worst case scenario because Investec had too many conditions?
3. The stadium was necessary to host matches up to the semi-final stage as no other site was available and neither athlone or newlands could be expanded.
4. 2010 stadium wont affect basic services
You would be an idiot to compare Stade de France with Greenpoint Stadium for the very simple reason- affluent mass population-
Stade de France is a cachment area for the whole of the Northern France region, and easily assessible to populations of several huge neighbouring metropoles and regions like Amsterdam, London, Brussels, etc. Cape Town is virtually isolated and travel there involves long haul driving or long/medium haul flights. People cannot afford to fork out R400 for concert tickets every month.
It is a fantasy to believe that Stade de France will manage Greenpoint Stadium effortlessly. There's a slim outside chance just above none that it can be done- but odds are that the city of Cape Town is going to be left carrying the can as usual. In fact I predict Stade de France will get its fingers burnt and remember you read it here first.
You would also be an idiot to believe that the Stadium building won't affect delivery of ratepayers services. As of yet National Government has not stepped in with the extra funding required for the stadium and other 2010 Fifa demands and chances are excellent that property rates will increase again. Unfortunately as we have seen in the past few years, basic service delivery on the Atlantic Seaboard has DECLINED even though we pay double or almost double the rates we paid a few years ago. Want some examples. Just ask.