Nope, just wayyy too much time on my hands lolHAHAHAHAHA! You’re a good writer, is that your profession?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Nope, just wayyy too much time on my hands lolHAHAHAHAHA! You’re a good writer, is that your profession?
yupNice! Is this result using Vuma Aerial?
Thanks.I see this is a limited offer until 28 Feb 2020. Websquad and Cell C indicate this on their package details... but the other ISPs that offer the package at R1499 don't, however likely the same. What will be the cost after 28Feb 2020 I wonder..?
Thanks.I see this is a limited offer until 28 Feb 2020. Websquad and Cell C indicate this on their package details... but the other ISPs that offer the package at R1499 don't, however likely the same. What will be the cost after 28Feb 2020 I wonder..?
I'm guessing the lite package is an attempt on Vumatels part to see how their network would run while offering Gigabit. The price is so low (1gbit symmetric is indcated as being around R7000 for comparison) since local bandwidth costs basically next to nothing, so they can offer a really cheap package that covers local bandwidth, especially since it is a cost carried by the ISP (to my knowledge at least).Thanks.I see this is a limited offer until 28 Feb 2020. Websquad and Cell C indicate this on their package details... but the other ISPs that offer the package at R1499 don't, however likely the same. What will be the cost after 28Feb 2020 I wonder..?
Is there a big difference between Vumatel and Vumatel Aerial?
you share the 1 gig pipe with everyone else connected to it
you share the 1 gig pipe with everyone else connected to it
Apparently anywhere between 32-64 users...I believe its 1.2 Gbit/s upstream and 2.4 Gbit/s downstream, as they use GPON?
Apparently anywhere between 32-64 users...![]()
Up to 64, but no one has yet to post anything concrete as to how many splits Vumatel actually uses.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| Gateway - 0 | 64 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| as-vuma.jb-is-pld-01.za.ws.net.za - 82 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 2 |
| core.as-02.jb1.za.ws.net.za - 0 | 64 | 64 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| core.cr-01.jb1.za.ws.net.za - 0 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 |
| ixp-xe-4000.pe-ix01.jb1.za.ws.net.za - 0 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| google.ixp.joburg - 0 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 1 |
| 209.85.251.74 - 0 | 64 | 64 | 47 | 48 | 68 | 47 |
| 209.85.249.71 - 0 | 64 | 64 | 46 | 46 | 48 | 46 |
| mba01s08-in-f14.1e100.net - 0 | 64 | 64 | 46 | 46 | 47 | 46 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider
PS C:\> tracert google.com
Tracing route to google.com [216.58.223.110]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Gateway [192.168.1.1]
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms core.as-02.jb1.za.ws.net.za [160.119.224.89]
4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms core.cr-01.jb1.za.ws.net.za [160.119.224.29]
5 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms ixp-xe-4000.pe-ix01.jb1.za.ws.net.za [160.119.224.17]
6 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms google.ixp.joburg [196.60.8.166]
7 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms 209.85.251.74
8 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms 209.85.249.71
9 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms mba01s08-in-f14.1e100.net [216.58.223.110]
Everything is working great, but there appears to be a routing bug in JHB on the vumatel handoff? @websquadza
Code:|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------| | Gateway - 0 | 64 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | | as-vuma.jb-is-pld-01.za.ws.net.za - 82 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 2 | | core.as-02.jb1.za.ws.net.za - 0 | 64 | 64 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | | core.cr-01.jb1.za.ws.net.za - 0 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | | ixp-xe-4000.pe-ix01.jb1.za.ws.net.za - 0 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | | google.ixp.joburg - 0 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 1 | | 209.85.251.74 - 0 | 64 | 64 | 47 | 48 | 68 | 47 | | 209.85.249.71 - 0 | 64 | 64 | 46 | 46 | 48 | 46 | | mba01s08-in-f14.1e100.net - 0 | 64 | 64 | 46 | 46 | 47 | 46 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider PS C:\> tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [216.58.223.110] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Gateway [192.168.1.1] 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms core.as-02.jb1.za.ws.net.za [160.119.224.89] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms core.cr-01.jb1.za.ws.net.za [160.119.224.29] 5 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms ixp-xe-4000.pe-ix01.jb1.za.ws.net.za [160.119.224.17] 6 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms google.ixp.joburg [196.60.8.166] 7 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms 209.85.251.74 8 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms 209.85.249.71 9 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms mba01s08-in-f14.1e100.net [216.58.223.110]
The thing I don't get is the limitation on the upload speeds. I don't see why they wouldn't just offer a symmetrical gigabit package for local content and international is guaranteed at 200/200 with a possiblity to boost depending on capacity. This smells like some nonsense Telkom would pull by withholding capacity...
Anyway like I said, the above is pure guesswork and speculation, but it's somewhat of an educated guess... I guess... lol?
Maybe @websquadza can answer that one