Will Madonsela release 'state capture' report?

sox63 said:
I think van Rooyen's interdict is going to be heard at 10 this morning, if it's not granted, she will release the report.
Click to expand...

What's the legal standing on this?

An interdict means you can't carry on with what you were going to do. But if it's not been granted yet, how does it affect her? Otherwise a "notice to interdict" is pretty much an interdict already.
 
Voicy said:
What's the legal standing on this?

An interdict means you can't carry on with what you were going to do. But if it's not been granted yet, how does it affect her? Otherwise a "notice to interdict" is pretty much an interdict already.
Click to expand...


According to the link posted by Yorkie in this thread, an intention to interdict is not an interdict. Hence I think the van Rooyen application will decide if it's published
 
sox63 said:
According to the link posted by Yorkie in this thread, an intention to interdict is not an interdict. Hence I think the van Rooyen application will decide if it's published
Click to expand...

Oh, no, looks like he got bad legal advice again :D
 
A person can apply for an interim interdict which can be granted before the formal interdict goes to court. However there are quite stringent requirements for that and I haven't seen that wording anywhere in the news, just the notice which has NO PREVENTITIVE binding.

Just my 2c from research.
 
Voicy said:
What's the legal standing on this?

An interdict means you can't carry on with what you were going to do. But if it's not been granted yet, how does it affect her? Otherwise a "notice to interdict" is pretty much an interdict already.
Click to expand...

A lawyer on 702 this morning said there is nothing stopping her from releasing the report today.
 
EtienneK said:
A lawyer on 702 this morning said there is nothing stopping her from releasing the report today.
Click to expand...

Kosmik said:
A person can apply for an interim interdict which can be granted before the formal interdict goes to court. However there are quite stringent requirements for that and I haven't seen that wording anywhere in the news, just the notice which has NO PREVENTITIVE binding.

Just my 2c from research.
Click to expand...

That's what I thought, thanks!

sox63 said:
According to the link posted by Yorkie in this thread, an intention to interdict is not an interdict. Hence I think the van Rooyen application will decide if it's published
Click to expand...

So she can publish it at 9am because Des's application hasn't been approved yet?
 
Can a legal person on here explain how he wants to obtain an interdict next week to stop her from releasing a report which she intends to do today? Can he do time travel?
 
Candystore said:
Can a legal person on here explain how he wants to obtain an interdict next week to stop her from releasing a report which she intends to do today? Can he do time travel?
Click to expand...

General and Special Relativity are western neo-colonialist science fallacies.
 
EtienneK said:
A lawyer on 702 this morning said there is nothing stopping her from releasing the report today.
Click to expand...

but it is a nice way to show how the top dogs are worried about the report... even if it is just blank :crylaugh:
 
Candystore said:
Can a legal person on here explain how he wants to obtain an interdict next week to stop her from releasing a report which she intends to do today? Can he do time travel?
Click to expand...

According to some sources he is applying for an urgent interdict @ 10am this morning to stop her. If granted, there is no need to wait until tuesday as she will be blocked but a number of legal folks I know say they doubt a judge/mag will grant it.
 
Kosmik said:
According to some sources he is applying for an urgent interdict @ 10am this morning to stop her. If granted, there is no need to wait until tuesday as she will be blocked but a number of legal folks I know say they doubt a judge/mag will grant it.
Click to expand...

The judge / mag who will grant this will have to have huge iron balls, because we as public will just put him / her in the Zuma box.
 
Report won't be released, PP got a legal advise from the lawyers not to continue with the release pending the interdict.
 
diesel said:
Problem is the info would be seen as compromised and would probably not be worth much and dismissed.
Click to expand...

Not nessasarily, could be somebody else will use it to go forward and base another impeachment vote on it.....

These interdict don't mean much in the day and age of the internet,

Once it's been released and on the net, no nation on earth can censor it.....
 
Pending the interdict, which means 10am so it doesn't change much anyway !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X