15 years from now, we might not even have AA anymore. AA is still needed today but 15 years from now is a long time, alot might have changed by then including the gvt itself.
Then why was there no sunset clause from the outset?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
15 years from now, we might not even have AA anymore. AA is still needed today but 15 years from now is a long time, alot might have changed by then including the gvt itself.
This is an extremely important and seems to be too difficult for many to grasp.
There is still a difference between acting democratically and doing what is right and what is the best thing to do.
Exactly, protection of minorities is a cornerstone of most civilised democracies.
Exactly. There has been no deadline set for the end of AA. Government needs to define a point in the future that they believe the inequalities have been rectified.Then why was there no sunset clause from the outset?
Read all the words you have used.Exactly, protection of minorities is a cornerstone of most civilised democracies.
Exactly. There has been no deadline set for the end of AA. Government needs to define a point in the future that they believe the inequalities have been rectified.
If non-whites are prepared to raise a generation of people happy to get by on skin colour alone then there is an issue to be sorted out because it can only result in more inequality.
tibby and Bageloo: It is clear to me that you support skin colour and not morals, ethics, principles and general civility. I class you with all the misguided Zuma, Winnie Mandela, Mugabe, etc supporters whose motives are so blatantly obvious.
Then why was there no sunset clause from the outset?
Read all the words you have used.![]()
That is entirely dependant on the pace of transformation. The slower the pace, the longer it takes for us to achieve equality.Exactly. There has been no deadline set for the end of AA. Government needs to define a point in the future that they believe the inequalities have been rectified.
If non-whites are prepared to raise a generation of people happy to get by on skin colour alone then there is an issue to be sorted out because it can only result in more inequality.
Affirmative action measures are measures designed to ensure that suitably qualified people from designated groups have equal employment opportunities and are equitably represented in all occupational categories and levels in the workforce of a designated employer..."
Wrong. I don't support skin colour. I support equality. Something you perhaps are still trying to block even today.tibby and Bageloo: It is clear to me that you support skin colour and not morals, ethics, principles and general civility. I class you with all the misguided Zuma, Winnie Mandela, Mugabe, etc supporters whose motives are so blatantly obvious.
Wrong. I don't support skin colour. I support equality. Something you perhaps are still trying to block even today.
What are Zuma and Winnie's motives.
No one is getting stuff for free. I'm very qualified for this job that I'm doing. If there was no affirmative action, I would have been overlooked in favour of a white person who could have been even less qualified than myself.Because getting stuff for free is nice, why close the door on it? People in Africa don't like to work for stuff if you can get it for free.
No one is getting stuff for free. I'm very qualified for this job that I'm doing. If there was no affirmative action, I would have been overlooked in favour of a white person who could have been even less qualified than myself.
Apartheid did not support equality.
Affirmative Action does not support equality.
But AA is based on equality.
Apartheid perpetuated inequality. Affirmative action is seeking to reddress that inequality. At the moment we are not equal. We can't just carry on as if it's business as usual.Apartheid did not support equality.
Affirmative Action does not support equality.
And you base that on what exactly?Untrue. Completely untrue
Apartheid perpetuated inequality. Affirmative action is seeking to reddress that inequality. At the moment we are not equal. We can't just carry on as if it's business as usual.
And you base that on what exactly?
Oh just because the kids weren't in the financial aid lane means they got bursaries? Bloody hell. Ever heard of a student loan?think before you type ****.
![]()
Where there's equality, affirmative action is neither needed nor applied. That should tell you something about the objectives of AAYou must be joking.