Geoff.D
Honorary Master
The Seacom press release stated that traffic would be shifted to Seacom capacity available on WACS.
No, it is not a given that other WACS capacity would be affected. It depends on how Seacom has provided for the backup capacity.
Full back up available? i.e. traffic is normally shared between both routes with each route loaded to a maximum of 50% ---- then no impact should be noticeable by anyone.
Not the case? Then Seacom customers only will experience some congestion.
Afrihost customers only affected? That depends on how Afrihost route traffic originating/termination in Durban. Personally I think it is a bit of a stretch to state that the performance experienced in Durban was due to the Seacom failure , without some more routing analysis done to back up the claim.
No, it is not a given that other WACS capacity would be affected. It depends on how Seacom has provided for the backup capacity.
Full back up available? i.e. traffic is normally shared between both routes with each route loaded to a maximum of 50% ---- then no impact should be noticeable by anyone.
Not the case? Then Seacom customers only will experience some congestion.
Afrihost customers only affected? That depends on how Afrihost route traffic originating/termination in Durban. Personally I think it is a bit of a stretch to state that the performance experienced in Durban was due to the Seacom failure , without some more routing analysis done to back up the claim.