View attachment 789423
Mine is still gucci, but I did tell everyone to not share accounts but rather regen new ones...

Wireguard.
Was your config shared? I've had my session open for a long time so it could be that. I won't reconnect to find out.
Same here from Cool Ideas. Westville KZN.
Hey @AfriMan
Why has PUBG latency stayed absolutely terrible even after the cables have been fixed? Some nights the pings are actually worse on the fixed cables than it was when you guys were on SEACOM. Every other european service runs perfectly fine at 170-180ms, but PUBG barely manages 200ms.
This is on Openserve, Durban.
Some traffic is going via WACS and other Seacom. So if you use a european looking glass you will see incoming traffic is with Seacom still.
So what is happening in your case because you are from KZN the traffic goes to JHB to CPT to EU. Those ones would give you 200ms.
Other EU locations will go over Seacom cable giving you the lower latency.
Thanks for the insight, appreciate it.
Yeah, but it is either congested or really badly routed. Those tests were during off-peak. In the evenings and now it sits around 240-250ms, which is terrible. Before the whole cable break debacle my ping would never push past 190 even during peak times.
I got a test account from CoolIdeas and the latency is pegged at 180.
TRACEROUTE:
traceroute to 169.1.226.93 (169.1.226.93), 15 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 Blizzard Blizzard 0.603 ms 0.590 ms 0.590 ms
2 37.244.24.3 (37.244.24.3) 1.917 ms 1.944 ms 1.948 ms
3 Blizzard Blizzard 1.434 ms 1.470 ms 1.577 ms
4 137.221.66.44 (137.221.66.44) 1.435 ms 1.552 ms 1.559 ms
5 137.221.78.68 (137.221.78.68) 1.920 ms 1.921 ms 1.921 ms
6 137.221.78.32 (137.221.78.32) 1.224 ms 1.249 ms 1.231 ms
7 seacom.equinix-am1.nl-ix.net (193.239.117.234) 2.402 ms 2.407 ms 2.815 ms
8 ae-5-0.er-01-ams.nl.seacomnet.com (105.16.9.13) 171.481 ms 171.521 ms 171.528 ms
9 xe-0-1-0-7.cr-01-lhr.uk.seacomnet.com (105.16.13.205) 169.111 ms 169.156 ms 167.898 ms
10 xe-0-7-0-1.cr-01-cpt.za.seacomnet.com (105.16.14.13) 178.874 ms 176.672 ms 175.661 ms
11 xe-1-0-0-0.er-01-cpt.za.seacomnet.com (105.16.31.9) 175.312 ms 175.603 ms 175.583 ms
12 105.22.67.102 (105.22.67.102) 219.058 ms 218.915 ms 218.848 ms
13 vlan1222.terjhb-igw2.net.echosp.link (102.67.176.10) 216.432 ms 207.700 ms 207.659 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *
23/02/2020 16:34:39 UTC
--------------------
why do i see angola cables on blizzard reverse trace?Code:TRACEROUTE: traceroute to 169.1.226.93 (169.1.226.93), 15 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 Blizzard Blizzard 0.603 ms 0.590 ms 0.590 ms 2 37.244.24.3 (37.244.24.3) 1.917 ms 1.944 ms 1.948 ms 3 Blizzard Blizzard 1.434 ms 1.470 ms 1.577 ms 4 137.221.66.44 (137.221.66.44) 1.435 ms 1.552 ms 1.559 ms 5 137.221.78.68 (137.221.78.68) 1.920 ms 1.921 ms 1.921 ms 6 137.221.78.32 (137.221.78.32) 1.224 ms 1.249 ms 1.231 ms 7 seacom.equinix-am1.nl-ix.net (193.239.117.234) 2.402 ms 2.407 ms 2.815 ms 8 ae-5-0.er-01-ams.nl.seacomnet.com (105.16.9.13) 171.481 ms 171.521 ms 171.528 ms 9 xe-0-1-0-7.cr-01-lhr.uk.seacomnet.com (105.16.13.205) 169.111 ms 169.156 ms 167.898 ms 10 xe-0-7-0-1.cr-01-cpt.za.seacomnet.com (105.16.14.13) 178.874 ms 176.672 ms 175.661 ms 11 xe-1-0-0-0.er-01-cpt.za.seacomnet.com (105.16.31.9) 175.312 ms 175.603 ms 175.583 ms 12 105.22.67.102 (105.22.67.102) 219.058 ms 218.915 ms 218.848 ms 13 vlan1222.terjhb-igw2.net.echosp.link (102.67.176.10) 216.432 ms 207.700 ms 207.659 ms 14 * * * 15 * * * 23/02/2020 16:34:39 UTC --------------------
This is the issue with latency. Traffic is incoming via Seacom and outgoing via Telkom. Should be sorted one they switch back to Telkom transit for both up and down traffic.
why do i see angola cables on blizzard reverse trace?