And wizrdofid - please don't being in your whole inferior and superior thing again :/
As per the article, it's simple talking about when features are brought out first.
Does this answer your question ?
Have you let "the android flagship pointless features measurement device" in your life yet ?
"the android flagship pointless features measurement device" saves
Don't use "the android flagship pointless features measurement device" and drive
"the android flagship pointless features measurement device" is like opinions every one has one.
Besides if we only talk about 5G, we don't have much to talk about, it's the only thing android has.

Yes it branched, out so what, why are you dead set keeping it on the 5G only, do you have some thing lose. ?
It's completely relevant as it still discusses whether or not early adoption of tech is wise or pointless.
Case and point, Core2quad CPU's was another 5 or 6 years before they actually became useful by that time they were already outdated and replaced by much faster and newer tech.
Same applies here, there ZERO gain from being the first to the market with 5G, other then bragging rights which boils down "My phone has 5G, shame you still stuck on 4G, have a tissue....". Everyone and anyone will always try and upstage some one else, be it for bragging rights or for financial gain, it is the natural order of my pointy stick is bigger than your point stick.It's clear you have a sweeping declaration that calling it any thing other then bragging rights at this point in time, is taboo.Do you have ANY evidential proof to suggest otherwise ?
To avoid offense lets call it, my pointy stick is bigger ?