^^vampire^^
Expert Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 3,877
Ok i'm actually going to say something here....
Firstly the recruiter is the company themselves they are clear about that in the job spec. Secondly, you cannot assume that a person is dumb because they don't fully understand what it is you do every single day, IT is very very broad and it is IMPOSSIBLE for one person to understand absolutely everything about every single role underneath it so we (HR & recruitment professionals) rely on the IT professionals to ensure the information provided is 100% correct. Finally IF there is a job spec generator that recruiters use it was designed by an IT professional who clearly got it wrong.
/end
Lukestar my apologies for hijacking your thread.
So what you are trying to tell me is that it is not the job of the recruiter to do the recruitment job. I very much can conclude that this person is dumb along with you too as your point is completely invalid.
I don't know any recruiter that draws up the job specs, they come from the client and we work according to the information provided by them. I may be wrong but i've never come across it..
The above looks to me like two job specs not one, so maybe a bit of a copy and paste mistake?
As for getting that IT is a broad subject matter I don't know if you guys/girls really really do understand, on my board for this week I'm currently am recruiting:
Front End Developers
3 x C# Developers
3 x C++ Developers
Test Analysts
IT Manager
Infrastructure Engineer
E-Learning Consultant
Application Support
Each one of those positions have a very specific set of skills needed, lets say for example the E-Learning Consultant, I have never ever recruited that kind of candidate but my client gave me a good spec with a great briefing so I did understand, IF they had made a mistake on that spec I would never have known because its not something i've worked with.
My point being, don't assume that as recruiters we are dumb because we don't always see what you see, we are trying to understand a boatload of roles with very very different tech.. point it out yes by all means because that is how we learn and grow our skill set to help you when you are looking for new opportunities. No need to make us feel like we add no value, because I can promise you each one of us have added value to many people needing a job
I know the guys on SS helped me so much when I started recruiting in 2007.. trust me I made plenty of these mistakes in the beginning but with their help and guidance, I understand things a whole lot better now.
Like someone else mentioned, don't they proof read the spec? And yeah you may need to learn and grow but I'm fairly certain that 5 minutes of googling the individual mess would allow you to ascertain that these are 2 (maybe 5 who knows) different things completely. Hell even some simple logic would tell you this "spec" is an absolute ****-storm of differences.
And when did it become my job to educate you (or anyone else not employed by me or under me)? If you know nothing about electricity/electrical engineering would you become an electrician? How do you recruit for IT people if you know nothing about it? I'm sorry but your excuses sound very much like a new level of BEE styled incompetence. You educate yourself first and then you tackle the task/job, not **** it up all the way until you get it right (or don't).
Like someone else said, you just receive the spec from the company and then post it. How is anything you do add any benefit? Most recruiters just gather as many **** candidates as they can find until the company finally hires some only mildly retarded person that fits 10% of the spec.
Last edited: