South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
That brings me to some of the other problems I have with Digichilli:
1) They have disclosed a users usage info...
...
+1
Couldn't have said it better
Screamingon SAOL
most of the time DC delivers nicely, speed, browsing etc. Its basically only torrents that remains a problem constantly. the rest comes and goes.
1) There are still 4meg lines on spicy and medium, that is not capped at 384 line speed...
2) Their providers does not give them a stable feed
3) The shaper that they are using is not not working properly.
That brings me to some of the other problems I have with Digichilli:
1) They have disclosed a users usage info...
2) Have made a personal attack to some users.
3) Limited/ Blocked users without informing them prior to action taken
4) Some of the prior to launch explanations regarding burst and concurrent connections has proved to be contrary to actual observations and official emails / pm's
5) It has taken them more than a month, and still no stable service
6) Their "shaping" is no better than any other shaped service out there!
I think it varies from user to user... I signed up 5 days ago and have cumulatively used DC for about 3 hours and all I do is browse. No torrents, no big http downloads.
where did they do that?
Straatkat is the only one going on about that. Necromancer was moaning over a fairly long period of time, and so Dave pointed out to necro that he was on a free account and he had done over 50 gigs.
Mountain out of a mole hill i would say.
In the end, there seemed more people with blind faith in this thread, than happy users...and that my fellow ADSL users, is the nr1 problem with ADSL in this country...How long have we talk about faster lines, and double line rental and caps? How many times have rumours circulated...
That is all fine and dandy, for someday. In the mean time you must have the bandwidth to feed your clientèle to your acceptable quality of service levels, which they are proclaiming to be at 256kbps... which is not happening...
So, if you can't provide that, then you don't have enough bandwidth to begin with.
...
I said it before and i will say it again ..
From the DC site: “This is a managed service, with business protocols taking priority. Network conditions will determine the speed of P2P* and torrents.”
So can we really complain about the gaming, torrents, p2p ..
o is that what they on about... no problem there
For you it might not be a big deal, for me it is.
Besides Necromancers comments was due to the quality of the service. And I think it is a big sticking point. It is irrelevant how much you download...it is uncapped afterall. If you can pull 50 gigs over 5 days does not mean you had good value for money, because you paid R5 per gig. That was Dave's argument at the time.
The point is, you paid for a service that should give you 256kbps minimum for 28/30/31 days, respective of the amount of days in a month.
Quality of service and price is the only benchmark that is important when comparing one uncapped account...to another...
As for how much you want to download and how fast, well that will determine the product category that you pick.
And if you don't "get that", you simply just don't understand uncapped broadband...
And if you don't "get that", you simply just don't understand uncapped broadband...
With that I agree, but if memory serves me, the users were asking for usage statistics...
Then clear with the person before disclosing, or send it to him in private...