South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
People that answer: Yes should really Google "basic human rights"...or maybe start by Googling the meaning of the word "basic".Do you believe access to the internet is a basic human right? And if so, will the government's plan to provide households with free data help achieve this?
Human rights are made up rights, aren't they? If it's decided to make Internet access a basic human right then it becomes a human right, just like the existing human rights.People that answer: Yes should really Google "basic human rights"...or maybe start by Googling the meaning of the word "basic".
Will never happen - None of the operators will ever let go of the arbitrary and totally without any backing manner of charging for data usage - they will together stall the implementation for years and years.Do you believe access to the internet is a basic human right? And if so, will the government's plan to provide households with free data help achieve this?
Karen said it was, you don't want to argue with her.Says who?? It is not.
None of those qualify it as a basic need.yes, because so many basic things depend on it,
from shopping to education to work to travel,
you need the internet in everyday life.
Agreed 100%problem comes in SA, with our Electricity supply, and then the Sewage,
and then the water supply, and then numerous other things that are much more basic.
like Traffic lights, potholes, and it goes on and on.
fix those first, then consider universal internet.
The current human rights originated from logic and common sense....very much the opposite of your usual arguments.Human rights are made up rights, aren't they? If it's decided to make Internet access a basic human right then it becomes a human right, just like the existing human rights.
With all the retards being born, we should swap that. Give away internets and make procreation a luxury.The current human rights originated from logic and common sense....very much the opposite of your usual arguments.
You do not need the internet to survive, pro-create or have dignity.
The internet is a luxury.
I don’t think any authority is qualified to decide what topics people may or may not research or read. Obvious, known pornography, social media and such sites could be filtered out, but beyond that there should be no restriction.Yes, which can be provided via a Library, as in thr future, we wont need the hardcopies as much. It will be niche product like music. The vast majority of the written word should be consumed/read electronically. This frees up the space for providing internet. Heavily filtered of course. They dont need data for porn etc. It should be STEM related and/or jobs vacancies or similar.
The Elementary question of politicsI suspect @ArmatageShanks is one of an increasing cohort who have never asked let alone answered the elementary questions of politics and social living, such as:
- What are rights? How do they differ from favours, privileges, concessions, grants, indulgences, bestowals and the like?
- What is the source and origin of rights? The State? Government favour? The Strong? Society? Corollary of natural obligations? Human nature and its author (God)?
- How are rights claimed, vindicated, protected?
- Can rights legitimately be taken away or suspended? If so, by whom (where do they get that right?), and under what circumstances?
I am of the school that does not recognise the state or society as the origin of rights. Rather, the state exists to protect, defend and vindicate rights we all have independent of the state (in my view, needless to say). That's what lies behind my No vote in this poll. And my opposition to the very notion of "rights" (ie entitlement) to stuff that is made available by the labour of others.
Not for discussion in this thread, of course.
Quite the edgy take there, reminds me of the Libertarian Police Department comedy sketchOf course they have a right to access these services online. Just as they have a right to visit a government office for services.
But no-one has the moral right to compel other people to pay for that access. You are still responsible for moving your carcass to a government office at your own expense. Likewise, the equipment and data services you use to access government e-services is for your own account. If not, where the hell does the expropriation stop if you don't have a principle on which to make a decision?
Most things humans think of as a basic human right is not that at all. In fact, I can not think of a real human right besides the right not to pollute. So much for that right....
You sound like a terrible human being, do you like seeing others suffer?The only basic human right is to life, i.e Thou Shalt Not Kill.
Beyond that - nada nothing, is a basic human right