PostmanPot
Honorary Master
Why when a good old CRT can be had for a tenth of the price? It handles SD best of all. In fact I am now using a CRT for everything. Even HD looks so much better
Sad.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Why when a good old CRT can be had for a tenth of the price? It handles SD best of all. In fact I am now using a CRT for everything. Even HD looks so much better
Yah no i checked the specs as well, it said 50hz. The salesman said 100hz. Guess the salesman didnt know. Mostly hd stuff for now, sd satellite for now but later probably hd....
advice please guys
saw this LG at a few shops.
wanted to know if its worth it?
LG 42le4500
its full hd, led, 100hz
got it at marko and dion wired from R6k to R6.3k
used for watching tv and playing games mostly...
thanks in advance!
Glad you're happy, but I dont think you realise how much better it can actually be. Your 1024x768 TV is dropping 1.3 million pixels of source resolution from the 1920x1080i DSTV HD signal.Watched this 2nd rate HD movie, White Lion, last night on MntHD and we were absolutely mesmerized by the scenes. So crisp, amazing detail, fantastic contrast
Up close (< 1m)
Don't forget that LED tv has a 3 year guarantee on it+1
"LED" marketing pushing the price up when the Samsung LA40D550 can be had for R4,999. Granted 2" smaller.
If you value your TV, which I'd imagine is mostly SD, it would be wise to check out Samsung PS43D450/D490 43" 3D (R4,999 - R6,500) plasma as it's guaranteed to handle SD better. Perhaps also the PS51D450 51" (R6,999).
Lol, that is actually good advice for some. My friend is so disappointed that her new 42" LG FHD LCD displays analogue SABC and eTV channels in all their terrible glory. She felt that she might as well have gotten a CRT tv instead of spending 5.2k on the 42 incher!Why when a good old CRT can be had for a tenth of the price? It handles SD best of all. In fact I am now using a CRT for everything. Even HD looks so much better
Duh, the < 1m was to try perceive some differential between two 1080 signals on 1080p screen that were looking so similar from normal 2-3m viewing distance.Most people watch from 2 - 3m+, not 1m.
I think we need a poll as to who prefers what and who is undecided on Plasma vs LCD vs LEDA lot of heated debate going on here!
Agreed, buying a FHD flatscreen without also investing in HDMI capable source devices is like chucking money down the toilet. I've always maintained you have to consider both source & output devices when investing in HD.My friend is so disappointed that her new 42" LG FHD LCD displays analogue SABC and eTV channels in all their terrible glory. She felt that she might as well have gotten a CRT tv instead of spending 5.2k on the 42 incher!
Typical.
Go to the store (preferable a professional AV shop with a dark room) and test the following:
R4,899 Samsung PS43D450
R4,999 Samsung LA40D550
R6,999 Samsung LA46D550
R6,999 Samsung PS51D450
You can take your media/console and hook it up. Remember to fiddle with the settings; they are always in 'store mode' when on display - full brightness/contrast/cell/back light which appears better to Joe Public under bright shop lighting.
p.s where did you get this pricing from?
Sad.
That's what I think when you recommend a HDReady 1024*768 Plasma to people...
So I'm all for CRT now because that handles SD much better than the HDR Plasma. And that's a fact. After all you have to consider that the average person mainly only watches SD, right?
Great price!
Are those proper LED tv's or just Led backlit LCD tv's...?
Not sure about the Ds, but based on the difference between my home C530 LCD and a C5000 LED at the office (both entry 50Hz), I prefer the picture of the LCD (also less reflective).Biggest bargain yet: Samsung UA46D5000 for R8999 at Makro. 46" LED TV!
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1qqCGaejZAY/TlJ-x-NvrAI/AAAAAAAAALg/O97D8yD0Ugc/s1600/32.jpg
Also UA40D5000 for R5899 40" LED TV!