It is not thick headed to insist on that which both parties had agreed to. This is wat we are paying for. Try and pay only 10% of your monthly instalment, see what happens- go ahead, I'll wait.
Yes, obviously it is clear their infrastructure can't handle the load. But how is that my problem? I am not Telkom, and I do not work for them. Harsh, maybe? Sure is, but that is simply the way I feel.
The thing is, I'm pretty sure this product was drawn up and signed off before their marketing department got the go-ahead to put a spin on it. Having worked on premises at a cellular provider, I'm pretty sure about this- still a guess, but an educated one.
And also, I'll ask again- regarding streaming of Netflix and 4K content. The calculations done in this thread has taken a single 1080P stream as a base. But 4K is here and I'm sure there are people that have the hardware to stream in 4K. So how will this compromise everybody seems happy to strike, affect said group of users? Granted, they are probably in the minority, But they too signed up for a service that would accommodate their much heavier use. Are they then also abusers of the system? A single 4K stream is about 7GB an hour- more than double that of 1080P (as per Netflix website)- and that's just a single stream.