PostmanPot
Honorary Master
And he was super enthusiastic about that. You should ask him to rate the support he received...
Facts are facts.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
And he was super enthusiastic about that. You should ask him to rate the support he received...
I should ask Drifter to rate the support he received, and whether he got the answer he was looking for or not.
You already said that he thanked you
Facts are facts.
Yes, his question was answered promptly. Nice chap and I'm happy that he appreciated the help.
And you have the best facts, and happiest packets, and most professory professoring around.
Let's address one of these facts: that you are a liar with no clue what you're doing - let's look on the bright side - look at what you've achieved even without knowledge, a moral compass, and the ability to tell the truth - you'll never need to worry about being wrong, nor absorbing more knowledge, and likelihood is you'll con a rich target one day and maybe even get away with it. It's not all negative...
I'm not a liar.
Of course. He asked a complex yes or no questions, and you flippen nailed it.
It may have been the wrong answer, but my god you said it with confidence...
Are you providing value to Mweb users by offering your "support"?
In my opinion PP has only been neutral and very helpful up to now, I haven't seen anything that could further this "agenda" of helping MWEB's reputation on this site.
I'm just glad to help.
I have no doubt that some people believe you have helped them. You are the homeopathy of network support. It doesn't mean you're truly useful, and at the end of the day if you're honest, you're lying to yourself and to them. Because homeopathy is bullschit, as are your networking skills...
It's a fact that I've helped them.
No I don't.
People repetitively wanted answers.
I did engage. You're lying again.
I was upset that privacy rules were broken. Not at you.
I don't sell internet connections, and am not involved with anyone who does.
There was nothing for the world to see yesterday. Correct, the intermittent YouTube issue with Chrome was resolved. I acknowledged the issue plenty of times, and told many others about it too. You're just lying more now.
I know what a liar is. No I'm not.
I do know what I'm doing.
I've never purported to be from MWEB. That's just your accusation and another lie.
Nope.
I'm taken to task by the same people who don't like MWEB and myself.
And my English is better than yours.
Eish.
Not behaviour very becoming of a CEO.You should stop.
I'm not here to argue with you. You evidently know best and would rather argue than learn. From the outset of this saga with you and the MWEB-PR-train you could have learned so much, and is the only way I did it. I shutup and I learned from others who I knew had a far superior knowledge to me on the subject.
There are better methods to those you are adopting, and in particular there are tools to use, systems to employ, specific tests for specific symptoms, and proprietary things we for example do on our side when running through diagnostics, all the while the customer will perform the same set of tests so there is consistency and they can prepare and gather data without our micro-management.
If you were only less argumentative and insistent with every single damn post, that you are right and every other person is wrong and has it in for you or Mweb, you could probably end up offering even better service on behalf of Mweb's team and help to resolve issues quicker, while expanding on your own networking knowledge, which if your public posts are anything to go by, are lacking for a support role but on the right track.
View this as constructive because it is how it is intended: you would have a far easier time and learn something along the way if you just calmed down, accepted that you are not always right, and used each engagement as an opportunity to learn rather than an opportunity to punt a brand or shift blame. Whether you intend for your posts to be read like that or not, that is the reality. At some point you have to realise that day-in, day-out people argue with you not because you help Mweb customers or believe that Mweb is great (heck, I read it for months on end without ever responding as it has nothing to do with that specific opinion), it is because you are so intent on being right that you're blinded by reason on this topic and it manifests in marketing nonsense like "Mweb simply doesn't have issues. Ever". Followed a day later by posts from you acknowledging that a persistent issue which had been reported in the thread on numerous occasions and which you appear to have done your damndest to find any excuse other than an Mweb fault, was resolved by Mweb.
You've gone from fanboi to liar - that's too far, even for PR agencies. Nobody is asking you to, or suggesting that you change your opinion about Mweb, nor that you stop helping people. From what I've read I think people tend to agree that their experience is valid and you have zero basis for countering it, as to do so would require you to work for Mweb and have historical data insight. Your experience routing over one IPC point over a particular part of the network in your location, may absolutely be vastly different to what other customers are experiencing routing over completely different Mweb infrastructure from another location, even nearby to your location, depending on which IPC points it routes over and transit routes it takes to get to the pre-set data-centre that hosts the equipment. You will be using different international links to other customers even on the same product, and you have no idea how the shapers are configured and on what contention ratios with what priority settings and on which layer, nor what the business logic is that is coded into the product managers. You have no insight into interconnect capacity, national traffic links, upstream capacity links and quality reports, IPC data, load balancer data, downstream links, port traffic on the core and edge, nor do you have any insight into the DNS configuration and files to see how data should be routing.
The bottom line is that you dismiss just about every report of issues without having the networking skillsets, tools, reporting access, and acumen to know what you're looking for. You claim that other people's experiences could not have been correct due to it not being something that you experienced, when in fact this line of reasoning does not apply as you are not in a position to replicate. You claim that the lack of responses in this thread is indicative of there being no issues but are very quick to say that Johnatan's statements about Crystal Web cannot be trusted because we often direct customers to our official support structures, while knowing full-well that Mweb do the same thing. It should also be pointed out that Mweb related post traffic began to die shortly after they introduced throttling on uncapped and removed the free news server, at which point MyBroadband users who tend to frequent the site began to switch to other ISPs. And even when you appear to be somewhat sincerely providing support on behalf of Mweb, you're giving people the run-around.
People believe that you somehow know what you are talking about and have sufficient networking skills to assist them. You don't. People come here asking Mweb for help and you respond. Of course people believe that you speak on behalf of Mweb and have deeper layers of access than you actually do. You have absolutely zero access to anything on their network, their interconnect partners, their national partners, their backhaul providers, international providers, nor do you have access on a hardware layer into the core and edge. You have access to your DSL account. That's it. So you're really not equipped to provide support of any type to end users and I should point out that if you are asking these people behind the scenes to share their usernames and passwords with you, you have bigger problems. Have you ever asked an Mweb user who asked for support on the forums to share their username and password with you so that you could test on their behalf, like you did with one of our customers? Think carefully about this one.
The bottom line is that you are in no position to argue with anyone's reported experiences as admittedly you have zero insight into the Mweb network and by design of a multi-point IPC carriage network, your experience may very well be completely different to theirs. You are in no position to be purporting to represent Mweb by offering support to people who come here looking for it from the Mweb employees hired to perform this exact function. You are only serving to offer a level of support so poor that they would have to repeat it with an official rep who knows what he/she is doing and has access to the relevant network and hardware stats to offer this support. You're only serving to confuse people, and while they may be appreciative, it's simply because they don't know any better to realise that they've potentially been duped. If I were to give you a test account, you would have just as much access to our network as you do to Mweb's and by your own low standards, would be in a position to start "helping" customers of ours. As someone who knows what is required to offer actual ISP support, I can assure you that you'd be stopped in your tracks the moment it was discovered. Mweb may love that you punt their brand at every opportunity (even slow speed reports) and that you take the work off their shoulders, but if clients understood that they were receiving the equivalent of a plaster when in actual fact they needed chemotherapy, they'd be rather pissed off. In this case you're sending people on their way nonethewiser about the cause of their problems, nor actual resolutions, because you cannot perform such a level of support. All you're able to do is upsell premium accounts to people you don't even know are throttled by Mweb or whether it's the root cause of their problems, by posting your spreadsheet and lecturing them about their poor choices in life.
I cannot understand how in good conscience you have been doing this, and how you could ever claim to have a modicum of ethics and morals knowing full-well the above. Mweb can happily confirm once again that you have no insight into their network and therefore even if you identified a clear oddity, all you have is assumption on your side to assume a conclusion, and are in no position to be suggesting solutions for problems you are admittedly in no position to diagnose. Does this help to clear up why you land up fighting with people so often about this? Does it help to clarify your own confusion that you perpetuate to Mweb clients about why your experiences may be vastly different to theirs? Does it help to explain why posting unfounded claims while purporting to be providing valuable help, is not in the best interests of the Mweb consumer? Are you in any way able to see things now from the other side of the table or will you really try to argue that you are well equipped to provide support to Mweb clients in any form? Even if you disclose no affiliation, the client will have to re-do all tests with Mweb, so you're just wasting people's time for your own ego...
Facts are facts.
Guys a recap please, whatever is going on here sounds hugely entertaining. But I dont have the time or patience to read through the thread.
Here's why it is becoming:
I can identify him conning you guys from a mile away.Don't fall for this BS.
ROestorf