SA Politics Thread Part 11: The GNU Normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol took action with a 48 hour ultimatum. And then went back to licking Squiddel`s boots after the their ultimatum was not met. DA = mini-ANC.
If you have no hope in the DA then you have zero reason to be in SA. They are literally the only option the country has. There is no other alternative. You better make plans to leave
 
Hogwash! The DA is a pure socialist party and very far to the left. They are very happy to throw the middleclass under the bus for their "pro poor" policies. They enforce equality by punishing and taking from the middleclass and rich. Comparing this to Germany is just more obvious of their lie. Countries in Europe have socialism only for very small minorities of people. Just another DA socialist lie.
 
If you have no hope in the DA then you have zero reason to be in SA. They are literally the only option the country has. There is no other alternative. You better make plans to leave
There is no hope for SA even if everybody votes DA. DA socialism can never work in SA. You are welcome to stay in the 3rd world socialist sh1th0le that is SA.
 
Has this guy ever read a post before rage replying?
What guy? Who is rage replying? I`m just stating facts, the DA is just another socialist scumbag party. They were useless in Tshwane, fixed f0kk0l. They wrecked a world heritage site, Knysna. And now the socialist bubble is starting to burst in CPT. The DA is perfectly suited to govern alongside the ANC.
 
Hogwash! The DA is a pure socialist party and very far to the left. They are very happy to throw the middleclass under the bus for their "pro poor" policies. They enforce equality by punishing and taking from the middleclass and rich. Comparing this to Germany is just more obvious of their lie. Countries in Europe have socialism only for very small minorities of people. Just another DA socialist lie.
Read before raging.

P.S. Can you guess who in Germany invented the concept of "social market economy", which has led Germany to where it is today? I'll give you two guesses.
 
Conversely, should the DA just up that to 98% to be righteously progressive?
No, what are you on about now?

It makes no sense not to deliver services to areas solely because they don't support you politically...
 
Conversely, should the DA just up that to 98% to be righteously progressive?

Part of that budget could go towards a commission to find out where all the money is going. I mean, the bottom line here is corruption. An argument could be made for taking advantage of a situation where corruption is the root issue, aka enabling. Because it looks an awful lot like enabling to me.
 
Read before raging.

P.S. Can you guess who in Germany invented the concept of "social market economy", which has led Germany to where it is today? I'll give you two guesses.
Stop deflecting. Nothing in SA can be compared to be similar to Germany. The DA is a 100% pure socialist scumbag party. Wealth distribution is extreme socialism, it will never work in SA where the poor is the majority by far. Just more DA lies and grandstanding. They will take from the middleclass until all are equally poor, except for them, the socialist political elite, who hikes their own salaries to whatever they feel like they deserve. And it is now starting to unravel in the Cape, the same way it already unraveled in Knysna. FVCK the DA!
 
Stop deflecting. Nothing in SA can be compared to be similar to Germany. The DA is a 100% pure socialist scumbag party. Wealth distribution is extreme socialism, it will never work in SA where the poor is the majority by far. Just more DA lies and grandstanding. They will take from the middleclass until all are equally poor, except for them, the socialist political elite, who hikes their own salaries to whatever they feel like they deserve. And it is now starting to unravel in the Cape, the same way it already unraveled in Knysna. FVCK the DA!
giphy.gif


And I'm called AI...
 
Stop deflecting. Nothing in SA can be compared to be similar to Germany. The DA is a 100% pure socialist scumbag party. Wealth distribution is extreme socialism, it will never work in SA where the poor is the majority by far. Just more DA lies and grandstanding. They will take from the middleclass until all are equally poor, except for them, the socialist political elite, who hikes their own salaries to whatever they feel like they deserve. And it is now starting to unravel in the Cape, the same way it already unraveled in Knysna. FVCK the DA!
You know what, just for shits and giggles, what do you not consider to be socialist...?
 
No, what are you on about now?

It makes no sense not to deliver services to areas solely because they don't support you politically...
What number would be the sweet spot. GHL is getting annihilated from one side, and squeezed from the other, on redistributive budget / squeezing the "rich". What number would you say (or to be anyone's opinion) on the right percentage of spend in those areas.

Personally, I am pretty gatvol of hearing that the "rich" should pay ever more. Because it gets more punitive every year, with even more guilt laid on top. It's becoming unsustainable, and they' re telling the "rich" that it's their fault. And the real clincher is that it's stated as the "rich" but increasingly includes the decidely middle class more every passing year.

Taxed to death. Gatvol!
 
What number would be the sweet spot. GHL is getting annihilated from one side, and squeezed from the other, on redistributive budget / squeezing the "rich". What number would you say (or to be anyone's opinion) on the right percentage of spend in those areas.
You could argue that it is less about the percentage and more about what gets done.

But to play along, anywhere between 50% and the current 75%. And it seems to me the budget focuses more on fixing and improving the infrastructure, especially in townships (you know, WHAT ABOUT KHAYELITSHA and so on).

Honestly, I don't mind if the townships are prioritised a bit more by local governments. But the rest of the municipality shouldn't be ignored at the same time. (Which, at least in CPT's case, isn't the situation).
Personally, I am pretty gatvol of hearing that the "rich" should pay ever more. Because it gets more punitive every year, with even more guilt laid on top. It's becoming unsustainable, and they' re telling the "rich" that it's their fault. And the real clincher is that it's stated as the "rich" but increasingly includes the decidely middle class more every passing year.


Taxed to death. Gatvol!
The way I understand it is that the okes with multi-million rand estates and incomes in the rich areas like Clifton, etc are the ones GHL is talking about. Not the middle class.
 
You know what, just for shits and giggles, what do you not consider to be socialist...?
LOL I`m laughing out loud because you think the DA is not socialist. Read my lips: "DA: we will implement wealth redistribution in a country with 60% unemployment and 90% poor people. We will take more from the already struggling middleclass and hand it out for free to the majority poor class." Sure sure, the DA is not socialist, NEVER! :ROFL:
 
You could argue that it is less about the percentage and more about what gets done.

But to play along, anywhere between 50% and the current 75%. And it seems to me the budget focuses more on fixing and improving the infrastructure, especially in townships (you know, WHAT ABOUT KHAYELITSHA and so on).

Honestly, I don't mind if the townships are prioritised a bit more by local governments. But the rest of the municipality shouldn't be ignored at the same time. (Which, at least in CPT's case, isn't the situation).

The way I understand it is that the okes with multi-million rand estates and incomes in the rich areas like Clifton, etc are the ones GHL is talking about. Not the middle class.
Are there any indications yet as to categories? That "not the middle class" and then going to R2m houses is, well... middle class.
 
Are there any indications yet as to categories? That "not the middle class" and then going to R2m houses is, well... middle class.
To use clifton as an example.

Is 4.5 million for a single-room apartment middle-class?

Even asked ChatGPT:
In the context of South Africa—and particularly Cape Town—paying R4.5 million for a single-room apartment in Clifton is not middle class. That is firmly upper class or wealthy territory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X