SA Politics Thread Part 11: The GNU Normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did you hate that a minority subjugated and oppressed a majority for decades stifling said majority's development and participation in the main economy, limiting career choices and educational options?
Well a majority of minority felt that that could not continue so they voted to stop it over 30 years ago.
It is classic that what was done before is being done now with more race laws in existance than what there were before.
I love how you are promoting revenge as the vast majority of those economically active then are no longer economically active anymore
 
Did you hate that a minority subjugated and oppressed a majority for decades stifling said majority's development and participation in the main economy, limiting career choices and educational options?
Rhetorical. Of course he does.

Anyone who thinks like him would get wet dreams if the option of apartheid returning was on the table.
 
Well a majority of minority felt that that could not continue so they voted to stop it over 30 years ago.
It is classic that what was done before is being done now with more race laws in existance than what there were before.
I love how you are promoting revenge as the vast majority of those economically active then are no longer economically active anymore
You side stepped my question and in true form, are now making the moronic claim that there's more "apartheid (laws)" today. While somehow protecting onto me that I support revenge. What nonsense!
 
You side stepped my question and in true form, are now making the moronic claim that there's more "apartheid (laws)" today. While somehow protecting onto me that I support revenge. What nonsense!
I don't put anyone on my ignore list but his stupidity is really tempting me.
 
Any agreement will have its own terms and conditions that makes it an agreement, so even a 1% party can have an equal say as 20 or 40% party depending on what the terms and conditions of what constitutes an agreement are.

So the GNU parties can simply agree by the raising of hands and everyone can agree that they agree.

Or they can have a consensus where smaller members are suppressed through that sufficient consensus to reach an agreement.
Perfect. 🎯

The DA thought they were so "smart" they could hijack government with a mere 20% of the vote share in South Africa.
 
You side stepped my question and in true form ...
How could I reply as I was not economically active at the time..
As for the rest <shrug> ... It is what it is
Punishing those who were not involved , is called revenge
 
Ask yourself why the DA is the only party in the GNU that is so threatened by more parties joining the GNU, what are they so afraid of?
The DA is gone gone from the GNU. Their matriculant leader is going to pour petrol on the already burning war this morning.

BEE is a no go area. The president and the biggest party in South Africa have made that very clear. The DA is asking for trouble.
 
The DA is gone gone from the GNU. Their matriculant leader is going to pour petrol on the already burning war this morning.

BEE is a no go area. The president and the biggest party in South Africa have made that very clear. The DA is asking for trouble.
Of course Thieves would protect what is enabling them
Only to be expected
 
How would you define agreement? Keeping in mind a 1% party doesn't get an equal say as a 20% or 40% party, so you can't put it down to a vote where all parties get an equal vote...
An agreement amongst the parties does not necessarily mean all the parties agree.

Do we have written copy of this agreement ? Does anyone have it ? I would really like to read it before commenting on it.
 
The DA is gone gone from the GNU. Their matriculant leader is going to pour petrol on the already burning war this morning.

BEE is a no go area. The president and the biggest party in South Africa have made that very clear. The DA is asking for trouble.
John is probably in preservation mode by now, his Ministerial pension is the security of his family, Mrs Beaumont will never tolerate anything that seeks to jeopardize that.
 
John is probably in preservation mode by now, his Ministerial pension is the security of his family, Mrs Beaumont will never tolerate anything that seeks to jeopardize that.
Not everyone has the non existant ethics you seem to have
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X