South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yep, feeling equal amounts of sadness and embarrassment at this point.
Fear triumphs over hope. A sad day indeed.
One of my fave cities, at least aesthetically. I wonder how the vote went by demographic in Edinburgh, especially age.
Scotland Decides
SNP heartlands desert Salmond who abandons the battlefield for bed
Conservatives – highly relived, no breakup on their watch.
Labour – badly mauled, core voters in Scotland cannot be relied.
Lib Dems – faired not too badly.
SNP – an objective moratorium will acknowledge they blew it, they left too many questions unanswered. For all the slickness of the “party machine” and it was impressive and the PR was beautiful to look at but fatally flawed if you scratched beneath the surface. Style over substance, rhetoric over reality.
The “groat” stops with Salmond. As the self selected front man, the engine of Scottish Nationalism, he badly misjudged that he could get away with pitching dodgy economic data. Policies did not stand up to scrutiny and the usual accusation of “smarminess” was replaced with a display of child like petulance and intolerance.
United Kingdom – a timely wake up call not to take the nations of the UK for granted. But never again should 4 million voters be able to decide the national fate of 62+ million people in a democratic United Kingdom. If/when the next referendum takes place, the franchise will have to be extended to all British citizens and subjects (at home & aboard).
Summary: The SNP blew it, if they had the common sense and courage to acknowledge the flip side and risk of independence, if they held their nerve, kept their contempt in check and played a straight wicket (honest answers to real questions) they would have won.
Thank You Scotland (you saved us both)
More like reason triumphs over foolishness.
Yep, feeling equal amounts of sadness and embarrassment at this point.
Fear triumphs over hope. A sad day indeed.
That's how some may see it. But watching my country die is very sad.
Unfortunately fear has won and instead of building something great, we settle for sucking the hind titt. Settle for mediocrity.
And now they are on TV cheering and waving union flags. Fsck me, my country has died this morning. Scotland has died and most of the people are happy about it.
Friday is rubbish day here, and just back from taking out the garbage (nice little theme for meditation, btw - taking out the garbage).
Some quick thoughts on the No result:
1. I'm mildly disappointed of course, but not surprised. A clear Yes would have sent strong signals to the whole world about regional autonomy, and that is something I support as a general principle, including in SA.
2. Scotland losing the Independence vote doesn't mean Britain goes back to the status quo ante. Nearly half the Scots voted for independence, and that has huge ramifications going forward, not just for Scotland but for the whole Union. Greater autonomy must follow inexorably.
3. The direction is correct: Greater devolution and a steady dismantling of the over-centralised megastate. This is something to be welcomed. It is the future not just for Britain but for any progressive country.
4. Regional power, local power, grass roots power - this is the future. It runs contra the trend of the last 150 years and especially the post-war period. People everywhere feel the Modern State has become too large, too powerful, too intrusive. This is a sign of hope.
5. Economic and monetary ties do not necessarily require political union. The Principle of Subsidiarity (more) is being rediscovered, and political sentiment globally is trending in that direction. This is to be welcomed, encouraged and supported.
With true subsidiarity, borders become less and less relevant - the locals at that place decide their issues and govern themselves. It in no way means regional and other alliances are not possible - on the contrary they are encouraged, enabled, become easier, less fraught. The more you strengthen power closer to the people it affects, the more they can reach out and cooperate peacefully with others. This truth is slowly being rediscovered. The exact opposite is true - almost every war we've had for ages is because one group dominates central power and seeks to impose itself on others from an over-centralised political structure.I like that idea, but whose to draw the borders - easy misstep to "homelands"
With true subsidiarity, borders become less and less relevant - the locals at that place decide their issues and govern themselves.
Then to survive they (eg E Cape) need to develop policies that really and truly develop their people and their economy, instead of using the central state to expropriate those elsewhere to subsidise their lunatic political, economic and social backwardness.Yes, but taking an SA look at it:
Skilled workers would flock to WC/GP, leaving EC and others skillless. They will crash into poverty and become "just another failed african state"
Then to survive they (eg E Cape) need to develop policies that really and truly develop their people and their economy, instead of using the central state to expropriate those elsewhere to subsidise their lunatic political, economic and social backwardness.
The more autonomous the regions become the easier it is to see what works and what doesn't. People will vote for what works. Right now the central state is the only option people have to obtain regional development, so they will vote for a stronger central state. But that jsut perpetuates the illusion that loopy policies are working, whereas they are in fact impoverishing the entire country.
Good news this morning. shu.
Poor spizz must be gutted.
It is. But the central state and regional government has grabbed too much power. Hence the need to devolve, ie return power to the communities.Is this not the point of local governments?
I am all for the idea, but I do see some "easy targets" for abuse