The Anni Dewani Murder Case

Both how is that for answer so a ridiculous question?

Yup, by withholding the proof that you have, you have perverted the course of justice.
It's your fault that he is free, so stop bitching and moaning about it. It's your fault
 
On what basis are you convinced? Because you feel it in your water or because you actually have proof?

Courts by their nature and with good reason treat testimony of convicted criminals with a bit more salt than they do other witness. And in this case the criminals were at pains to try and limit their own culpability for reasons we do not know.
 
Courts by their nature and with good reason treat testimony of convicted criminals with a bit more salt than they do other witness. And in this case the criminals were at pains to try and limit their own culpability for reasons we do not know.

Thanks for that. Not sure what bearing it has, but thanks anyway.
 
Oh no, you said that I posted I had proof so come big mouth, put up or shut up and apologise as you are a liar.


I said nothing.

I prefer not to engage in circular reasoning. Waste of time.
 
Last edited:
I said nothing.

I prefer not to engage in circular reasoning. Waste of time.
Oh sorry it was your friend Imran, but you agreed.
Thats fine, nobody forced you to engage with me on this topic.
But your comment is even more ridiculous so by inference that means I said I have proof? :rolleyes:
And I should be surprised you lot think he is innocent?
 
Hey you are good at this!!

I will take my leave now. I prefer not to watch a ship wreck in progress.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X