South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'm playing devil's advocate here but what difference will the report make? There's nothing new in it, it simply confirms what everybody knows i.e. Zuma's corrupt and Guptas hold the power.
She has the right to recommend actions which are enforceable ie: nkandla and pay back the money. Hence this is basically treason.
EWN Reporter @ewnreporter
#StateCapture Van Rooyen says the publishing of adverse findings against him will cause 'grave damage to my reputation'.
Ranjeni Munusamy @RanjeniM 8m8 minutes ago
Ranjeni Munusamy Retweeted EWN Reporter
I think the “Fat Rambo” outfit took care of that.
JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - South Africa's ruling party said on Friday it supported the release of findings of an anti-corruption investigation into claims of political interference by friends of President Jacob Zuma, despite a court bid by Zuma to block the report.
I wonder if Zuma can get the death penalty if he's found guilty of high treason...
And there go the cracks
Those cracks are set to shortly become chasms!
I'd think they'd be legal sounds like location info and such records require a subpoena so no issue there.Oh dear, cellphone recordings again. Were they legally obtained? And by who? No way this is going to be resolved soon
I'm not so sure this time. Their tune has slowly been changing now that they know that her findings are binding. Those who haven't been caught will want to keep it that way, and defending the guilty will only bring the spotlight onto them which they'd want to avoid. The best they can do is keep their mouths shut which will allow the anti-Zuma faction to start making plays...In reality they will cover for Zuma when push comes to shove, again.
Oh dear, cellphone recordings again. Were they legally obtained? And by who? No way this is going to be resolved soon
#DesVanRooyen on whether he visited the Guptas - he wants details on when and where these alleged visits happened.
http://ewn.co.za/Features/State-capture-court-battleThe draft order indicates that the matter be postponed in order to include time for filing papers. Court rules the PP's report cannot be released.
I'm not so sure this time. Their tune has slowly been changing now that they know that her findings are binding. Those who haven't been caught will want to keep it that way, and defending the guilty will only bring the spotlight onto them which they'd want to avoid. The best they can do is keep their mouths shut which will allow the anti-Zuma faction to start making plays...
#StateCapture both Zuma and Van Rooyen’s matter to be heard on 1 Nov. The report will be preserved pending the court’s decision. BB
http://www.biznews.com/undictated/2...witter&utm_term=Autofeed#link_time=1476439443
The Indian Gupta family – at the centre of allegations on state capture – first burst into the public spotlight when it was revealed in 2013 that a commercial plane carrying about 200 wedding guests landed at Waterkloof Airforce Base. The group was attending the wedding of Vega Gupta and Aakash Jahajgarhia at Sun City. As News24 recounts, the government subsequently launched a multi-department probe and several suspensions and arrests of officials. The scandal reached all the way to the top with President Jacob Zuma, a friend of the wealthy Indian family, accused of having given permission for the landing. He denied the claim. In January 2015 charges against two SANDF officers accused of involvement were withdrawn, one of whom was Lieutenant Colonel Christine Anderson. She claimed to have SMSes linking President Zuma to the controversy, notes News24. Former chief of state protocol Bruce Koloane ended up being the biggest fall guy. He pleaded guilty to all charges relating to his involvement. Koloane was demoted but later got a diplomatic post to a key European position. In this exposé by a BizNews community member, it can be revealed that the investigators have also subsequently rewarded with top jobs. – Jackie Cameron