South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Think about it logically, then give one, just one, reason why MTN and/or Vodacom should reduce 3G rates...
See my post #186.so more people can use the service = more money?
See my post #186.
Cool, thanks for letting us know.the network is fine - that's not the real problem.
See my post #186.
Cool, thanks for letting us know.
Can you post the results of your study please? I'm interested to see how many towers can do 7.2Mbps.
Also some graphs showing the percentage of the tower's capacity used at various times of the days would be nice.
They should just start offering lower speeds such as 512kbps/1mbps and drop the prices proportionately. Rather have 7 people connect to a tower at 1mbps instead of 1 person at 7.2mbps. This will solve the "there is not enough backhaul so we cant drop prices" issue. Drop the speeds and the prices.
I would be prepared to buy 1GB 3G bandwidth at 1mbps speeds for R80. At R289 per GB you wont get a cent. Just three months left for my 24 month 3G contract to end. Can't wait to get ADSL and scrap Vodacom for good.
They should just start offering lower speeds such as 512kbps/1mbps and drop the prices proportionately. Rather have 7 people connect to a tower at 1mbps instead of 1 person at 7.2mbps. This will solve the "there is not enough backhaul so we cant drop prices" issue. Drop the speeds and the prices.
I would be prepared to buy 1GB 3G bandwidth at 1mbps speeds for R80. At R289 per GB you wont get a cent. Just three months left for my 24 month 3G contract to end. Can't wait to get ADSL and scrap Vodacom for good.
I reckon they won't do this because most of their customer would drop down and it would cost them big bucks. I doubt many people who use 3G need anything more than 1 mb/s?
I would keep using the 3.6mbps service if it was viable. But 10gb a month would cost me more than an arm and a leg. It would include a nut too.
Were you perhaps that strange nut collecting creature from ice age in a previous life?Anymore complaining out of you and im gonna raise you the other nut also come next bill run jy!
Vodacom is already billing people on broadband standard and advanced different rates while applying different speed profiles. So I see no reason why they cannot implement it. I think however it could make choices more complicated for customers and while the speed formula works for fixed (i.e. predictable) services I don't think it works as well for wireless. Just see how often we get have people posting here that they signed up for advanced and were suddenly expecting blistering 7.2 speeds but were not getting it.I also would not mind to see pricing based on lower speed profiles....but not sure how or if this can be implemented. I would hate for the billing systems to be screwed up like MTN did because of "upgrades" to the system.
There is already a package, called "Advanced" for no logical reason, that enabled Vodacom to provide you with higher speeds provided there's sufficient backhaul and they don't screw up the speeds limitation at the end of the month (ask Ginggs about it), so WTF can't VC limit me to 3.6 (which is rarely, if ever, achieved) at a lower rate?I also would not mind to see pricing based on lower speed profiles....but not sure how or if this can be implemented. I would hate for the billing systems to be screwed up like MTN did because of "upgrades" to the system.
Just see how often we get have people posting here that they signed up for advanced and were suddenly expecting blistering 7.2 speeds but were not getting it.
I am one of those customers but stopped complaining because it did not help, with the "LIES" and "BIG CORPORATE" Bull**T that emminated from Vodacom, in the face of inderpendent forensic proof that they were talking Bull**T. I am one of many customers in the same boat.
All because they were to big to admit OPENLY that BACKHAUL was the problem.
Even simpler, don't charge different rates for different theoretical speeds. MTN and Telkom 3G charge the same rate whether you get 3G, 3.6 or 7.2; you get the fastest speed your modem, their towers and their backhaul can provide. After all, they all charge per megabyte, so the faster you consume it, the sooner you are going to need another bundle.The simplest solution IMO is for the caps to be bumped up across the board. In addition to that I would like to see the in bundle rates on standard match out of bundle rates, advanced can be scrapped and people who want 7.2/14.4 can pay a VAS rate.
Even simpler, don't charge different rates for different theoretical speeds. MTN and Telkom 3G charge the same rate whether you get 3G, 3.6 or 7.2; you get the fastest speed your modem, their towers and their backhaul can provide. After all, they all charge per megabyte, so the faster you consume it, the sooner you are going to need another bundle.