Hi All,
As mentioned I have been off ill so there is no way to respond to what has happened to this thread in the last few days.
Just to respond to most of the previous discussions around Octotel, In Cape Town a basic breakdown of our Topology is as follows:
Vumatel Trenched, NNI From Vumatels kit at IS Bree, across our backhaul to Teraco Rondebosch to one of our core networks (Core1), it's this portion that then connects directly to our London Core.
Vumatel Aerial, NNI From AEx's kit at Teraco Rondebosch, to a separate core network (Core2) which then interconnects to our other core (Core1), still within Teraco Rondebosch and off to London.
Octotels NNI connects into PPP Concentrators that interface with Core2, the same Core as Vumatel aerial
Existing Frogfoot NNI interconnects to Core1
New Frogfoot NNI interconnects to Core2
So considering most people are having issues on Octotel and Frogfoot and not much on Vumatel aerial (PPP) or Vumatel trenched (IPOE) this is why we focus on these networks and are working with them to resolve. I understand this is frustrating, but I dont see a reason why we would be prioritising Vumatel customers over any other network. Our Octotel interface currently peaks at around 25%, there is no conspiracy around shaping or prioritising just a bit of a process. Frogfoot have deployed a piece of kit in our environment do do monitoring from their side and we have implemented a new NNI to start, these things just take time to coordinate and configure without interrupting current services.
I hope this makes things a bit more clear, we are not hiding anything and have no reason to not just purchase more international bandwidth when we need it, of which we still have ample in all locations.