Cool Ideas Fibre ISP - Feedback

prod · Apr 2, 2019

mugikhan said:
@TheRoDent Hello?

I mean, he might respond if you don't fling around insults like that. I understand you're frustrated, but really.

TranQ · Apr 2, 2019

My internet took a nose dive about 10 min ago. It was perfectly fine now I'm stuck with this...anyone else?

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 0 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 154.0.0.110 - 4 | 26 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| 154.0.4.193 - 0 | 30 | 30 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| 154.0.2.33 - 4 | 26 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
| 154.0.5.133 - 10 | 22 | 20 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| google.jinx.net.za - 4 | 26 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| 72.14.239.53 - 4 | 26 | 25 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 11 |
| google-public-dns-a.google.com - 4 | 26 | 25 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider

C:\Users\main>C:\Users\main\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64\iperf3.exe iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c lnms.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 18M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 EDWARD-PC 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:18:44 GMT
Connecting to host lnms.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host lnms.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: EDWARD-PC.1554225524.039422.1d243b16
[ 4] local 192.168.0.105 port 64106 connected to 154.0.1.254 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.03 MBytes 17.0 Mbits/sec 0.312 ms 152/1672 (9.1%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec 0.592 ms 153/1600 (9.6%) (omitted)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 4286 and received packet = 4289 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 4287 and received packet = 4289 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.97 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec 0.629 ms 134/1607 (8.3%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.92 MBytes 16.1 Mbits/sec 0.526 ms 162/1603 (10%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6703 and received packet = 6709 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6704 and received packet = 6709 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6705 and received packet = 6711 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.01 MBytes 16.9 Mbits/sec 0.397 ms 110/1615 (6.8%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.97 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec 0.476 ms 129/1602 (8.1%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.89 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec 0.410 ms 197/1609 (12%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.96 MBytes 16.4 Mbits/sec 0.533 ms 141/1608 (8.8%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.99 MBytes 16.7 Mbits/sec 0.520 ms 119/1606 (7.4%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec 0.474 ms 162/1608 (10%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec 0.565 ms 155/1603 (9.7%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.96 MBytes 16.4 Mbits/sec 0.500 ms 149/1614 (9.2%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 21.6 MBytes 18.1 Mbits/sec 0.493 ms 1458/16093 (9.1%)
[ 4] Sent 16093 datagrams
[SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 5 datagrams received out-of-order
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 6.7% (2.1%u/4.6%s), remote/sender 0.1% (0.0%u/0.1%s)

iperf Done.

jvrs · Apr 2, 2019

mugikhan said:
@TheRoDent Hello?

You really expect a response?

mugikhan · Apr 2, 2019

prOd said:
I mean, he might respond if you don't fling around insults like that. I understand you're frustrated, but really.

Cool. So I should pay for a subpar service for a week and just accept it?

ArtyLoop · Apr 2, 2019

mugikhan said:
Cool. So I should pay for a subpar service for a week and just accept it?

Yes but there is an easier way.. vote with your wallet

mugikhan · Apr 2, 2019

ArtyLoop said:
Yes but there is an easier way.. vote with your wallet

Well I can only cancel at the end of the month so I have to wait for that.

ArtyLoop · Apr 2, 2019

mugikhan said:
Well I can only cancel at the end of the month so I have to wait for that.

Or get ADSL like I did

TheRoDent · Apr 2, 2019

mugikhan said:
@PBCool Piss poor service. Another day of crap service and internet. Can you not sit on your ass and eat the money like the rest of SA?

Ticket ID: #COOL-20190402-247012

You can escalate this to @CoolChick thanks

TheRoDent · Apr 2, 2019

TranQ said:
My internet took a nose dive about 10 min ago. It was perfectly fine now I'm stuck with this...anyone else?

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 0 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 154.0.0.110 - 4 | 26 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| 154.0.4.193 - 0 | 30 | 30 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| 154.0.2.33 - 4 | 26 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
| 154.0.5.133 - 10 | 22 | 20 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| google.jinx.net.za - 4 | 26 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| 72.14.239.53 - 4 | 26 | 25 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 11 |
| google-public-dns-a.google.com - 4 | 26 | 25 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider

C:\Users\main>C:\Users\main\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64\iperf3.exe iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c lnms.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 18M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 EDWARD-PC 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:18:44 GMT
Connecting to host lnms.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host lnms.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: EDWARD-PC.1554225524.039422.1d243b16
[ 4] local 192.168.0.105 port 64106 connected to 154.0.1.254 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.03 MBytes 17.0 Mbits/sec 0.312 ms 152/1672 (9.1%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec 0.592 ms 153/1600 (9.6%) (omitted)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 4286 and received packet = 4289 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 4287 and received packet = 4289 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.97 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec 0.629 ms 134/1607 (8.3%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.92 MBytes 16.1 Mbits/sec 0.526 ms 162/1603 (10%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6703 and received packet = 6709 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6704 and received packet = 6709 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6705 and received packet = 6711 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.01 MBytes 16.9 Mbits/sec 0.397 ms 110/1615 (6.8%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.97 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec 0.476 ms 129/1602 (8.1%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.89 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec 0.410 ms 197/1609 (12%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.96 MBytes 16.4 Mbits/sec 0.533 ms 141/1608 (8.8%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.99 MBytes 16.7 Mbits/sec 0.520 ms 119/1606 (7.4%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec 0.474 ms 162/1608 (10%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.93 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec 0.565 ms 155/1603 (9.7%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.96 MBytes 16.4 Mbits/sec 0.500 ms 149/1614 (9.2%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 21.6 MBytes 18.1 Mbits/sec 0.493 ms 1458/16093 (9.1%)
[ 4] Sent 16093 datagrams
[SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 5 datagrams received out-of-order
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 6.7% (2.1%u/4.6%s), remote/sender 0.1% (0.0%u/0.1%s)

iperf Done.

Netstream Cape Town right?

topdog · Apr 2, 2019

@CoolChick can you please look at COOL-20190204-213236

stefan9 · Apr 2, 2019

@CoolChick : Can I have a proper response to ticket COOL-20180711-122832 . And no telling me my line is fine when I am only getting at max 10% of my line speed at international is not a proper response.

I have been patient for 8 months, Now I expect proper speedy action from your side to resolve this...

MDE · Apr 2, 2019

TheRoDent said:
Netstream Cape Town right?

My internet also went to a ball of ****. 10% packet loss. Constant buffering...sigh. Octotel, Southern Suburbs

Linux HPM.Home 4.15.0-47-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 13 10:44:52 UTC 2019 x86_64
Time: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:30:01 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: HPM.Home.1554229801.273213.2a40634a5
[ 4] local 192.168.1.8 port 40882 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 122 KBytes 997 Kbits/sec 0.565 ms 3/92 (3.3%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 119 KBytes 974 Kbits/sec 0.399 ms 4/91 (4.4%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 119 KBytes 974 Kbits/sec 0.580 ms 2/89 (2.2%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 113 KBytes 930 Kbits/sec 0.512 ms 6/89 (6.7%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.354 ms 5/90 (5.6%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.221 ms 4/89 (4.5%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 115 KBytes 941 Kbits/sec 0.395 ms 5/89 (5.6%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.125 ms 4/89 (4.5%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 113 KBytes 930 Kbits/sec 0.171 ms 7/90 (7.8%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 115 KBytes 941 Kbits/sec 0.174 ms 5/89 (5.6%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 118 KBytes 963 Kbits/sec 0.335 ms 3/89 (3.4%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 119 KBytes 974 Kbits/sec 0.218 ms 3/90 (3.3%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.20 MBytes 1.00 Mbits/sec 0.218 ms 44/893 (4.9%)
[ 4] Sent 893 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 0.5% (0.1%u/0.4%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.

leppie · Apr 2, 2019

Massive upload packet loss since 19:35

Code:

iperf3 -u -b 10M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --omit 2
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
[  4] local 192.168.0.2 port 50718 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.70 Mbits/sec  148  (omitted)
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.13 MBytes  9.50 Mbits/sec  145  (omitted)
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.30 MBytes  10.9 Mbits/sec  166
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.09 MBytes  9.18 Mbits/sec  140
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.83 Mbits/sec  150
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.26 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec  161
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.13 MBytes  9.50 Mbits/sec  145
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.26 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec  161
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.24 MBytes  10.4 Mbits/sec  159
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  9.95 Mbits/sec  152
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.72 Mbits/sec  148
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.12 MBytes  9.37 Mbits/sec  143
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.9 MBytes  9.99 Mbits/sec  1.130 ms  536/1524 (35%)
[  4] Sent 1524 datagrams

iperf Done.

iperf3 -u -b 80M -p 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --omit 2
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
[  4] local 192.168.0.2 port 50914 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  9.33 MBytes  78.2 Mbits/sec  1194  (omitted)
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  9.38 MBytes  78.4 Mbits/sec  1201  (omitted)
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  9.84 MBytes  82.6 Mbits/sec  1260
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  6.05 MBytes  50.7 Mbits/sec  774
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  6.24 MBytes  52.3 Mbits/sec  799
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  10.2 MBytes  85.9 Mbits/sec  1311
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  10.3 MBytes  86.3 Mbits/sec  1315
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  10.1 MBytes  84.9 Mbits/sec  1298
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  6.93 MBytes  58.1 Mbits/sec  887
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  10.2 MBytes  85.9 Mbits/sec  1310
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  10.9 MBytes  91.0 Mbits/sec  1389
[  4]   9.00-10.02  sec  10.3 MBytes  84.8 Mbits/sec  1316
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.02  sec  91.1 MBytes  76.3 Mbits/sec  2.412 ms  3607/11655 (31%)
[  4] Sent 11655 datagrams

iperf Done.

EU

First hop

My poor Fortnite

Edit: Make that local too :*((

Seems like Octotel is choking again...

Code:

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |
|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
|                             192.168.0.1 -    1 |  396 |  395 |    0 |    1 |   30 |    1 |
|                             154.0.0.246 -    8 |  309 |  286 |    3 |    4 |   36 |    5 |
|                             154.0.4.161 -    9 |  297 |  271 |    0 |    5 |  128 |    4 |
|                            154.0.15.181 -    8 |  310 |  288 |    3 |    5 |  131 |    5 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
   WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider

TranQ · Apr 2, 2019

TheRoDent said:
Netstream Cape Town right?

Netsream Paulshof, I thought Netstream is only in JHB and PTA?

I keep getting these random periods where packet loss goes to 10%+ ever since they fixed the fibre break but at the same time I for the first time get iperfs where my packet loss is 0% and was able tonight for the first time to stream DSTV Now at 1080p. It just feels like there are periods where it goes horribly wrong for 30 minutes or so...

Internet is fine at the moment.

image132 · Apr 2, 2019

@TheRoDent I've got the same as @MDE and @leppie

Octotel, Cape Town, Southern Suburbs.

iperf3.exe --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 20M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Strix 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:51:48 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: Strix.1554231108.581810.0bb4e75449a4
[ 4] local 192.168.1.247 port 51202 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.37 MBytes 19.8 Mbits/sec 0.094 ms 85/1858 (4.6%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.23 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec 0.145 ms 113/1786 (6.3%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.26 MBytes 19.0 Mbits/sec 0.110 ms 92/1786 (5.2%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.24 MBytes 18.8 Mbits/sec 0.113 ms 105/1786 (5.9%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.25 MBytes 18.9 Mbits/sec 0.115 ms 102/1786 (5.7%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.25 MBytes 18.9 Mbits/sec 0.134 ms 98/1784 (5.5%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.23 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec 0.137 ms 114/1787 (6.4%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.21 MBytes 18.5 Mbits/sec 0.103 ms 133/1786 (7.4%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.24 MBytes 18.8 Mbits/sec 0.093 ms 112/1786 (6.3%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.25 MBytes 18.9 Mbits/sec 0.122 ms 97/1785 (5.4%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.28 MBytes 19.1 Mbits/sec 0.101 ms 81/1785 (4.5%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.27 MBytes 19.1 Mbits/sec 0.112 ms 82/1784 (4.6%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 23.9 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec 0.122 ms 1016/17858 (5.7%)
[ 4] Sent 17858 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 1.7% (0.5%u/1.2%s), remote/sender 0.3% (0.0%u/0.2%s)

iperf Done.

CoolChick · Apr 2, 2019

stefan9 said:
@CoolChick : Can I have a proper response to ticket COOL-20180711-122832 . And no telling me my line is fine when I am only getting at max 10% of my line speed at international is not a proper response.

I have been patient for 8 months, Now I expect proper speedy action from your side to resolve this...

I see you have been in contact with the support manager. I will follow up with him first thing tomorrow and get back to you

MDE · Apr 2, 2019

Getting even better... lol

iperf 3.1.3
Linux HPM.Home 4.15.0-47-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 13 10:44:52 UTC 2019 x86_64
Time: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 19:08:15 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: HPM.Home.1554232095.686105.17137e902
[ 4] local 192.168.1.8 port 53683 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.693 ms 8/93 (8.6%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 KBytes 918 Kbits/sec 0.331 ms 8/90 (8.9%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 109 KBytes 896 Kbits/sec 0.445 ms 9/89 (10%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 109 KBytes 896 Kbits/sec 0.603 ms 9/89 (10%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.389 ms 4/89 (4.5%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 113 KBytes 930 Kbits/sec 0.589 ms 7/90 (7.8%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 108 KBytes 885 Kbits/sec 0.247 ms 10/89 (11%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.285 ms 4/89 (4.5%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 108 KBytes 885 Kbits/sec 0.259 ms 11/90 (12%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 116 KBytes 952 Kbits/sec 0.580 ms 4/89 (4.5%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 105 KBytes 862 Kbits/sec 0.385 ms 12/89 (13%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 113 KBytes 930 Kbits/sec 0.281 ms 6/89 (6.7%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.20 MBytes 1.00 Mbits/sec 0.287 ms 76/893 (8.5%)
[ 4] Sent 893 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 0.9% (0.1%u/0.9%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.

TheRoDent · Apr 2, 2019

Damn, and here we thought Octotel had sorted their issues

Sinbad · Apr 2, 2019

TheRoDent said:
Damn, and here we thought Octotel had sorted their issues

Eliminating one bottleneck often merely exposes the next one down the line :/

image132 · Apr 2, 2019

TheRoDent said:
Damn, and here we thought Octotel had sorted their issues

That would be too easy

Cool Ideas Fibre ISP - Feedback

Executive Member

Well-Known Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Executive Member

Senior Member

Executive Member

Cool Ideas Rep

Cool Ideas Rep

Active Member

Honorary Master

Expert Member

Senior Member

Well-Known Member

Expert Member

Cool Ideas Rep

Expert Member

Cool Ideas Rep

Honorary Master

Expert Member