Cool Ideas Fibre ISP - Feedback

Status
Not open for further replies.
IE... Telkom LTE, results are crap cause it's at best a 30Mbps line... The M value should have been around 25

iperf results.PNG
 
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.316]
(c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 8M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS 0
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 53313 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
iperf3: error - control socket has closed unexpectedly

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 8M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS 0
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 53314 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1014 KBytes 8.30 Mbits/sec 0.069 ms 0/711 (0%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 977 KBytes 8.00 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/685 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 977 KBytes 8.00 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/685 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 977 KBytes 8.01 Mbits/sec 0.038 ms 0/685 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 977 KBytes 8.00 Mbits/sec 0.064 ms 0/685 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 977 KBytes 8.00 Mbits/sec 0.051 ms 0/685 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 975 KBytes 7.99 Mbits/sec 0.071 ms 0/684 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 977 KBytes 8.00 Mbits/sec 0.059 ms 0/685 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 978 KBytes 8.01 Mbits/sec 0.022 ms 0/686 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 975 KBytes 7.99 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 0/684 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 9.73 MBytes 8.00 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/6988 (0%) sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 9.57 MBytes 8.03 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 0/6875 (0%) receiver

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 10M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS 0
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 49649 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.24 MBytes 10.4 Mbits/sec 0.043 ms 0/889 (0%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.059 ms 0/856 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.042 ms 0/857 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 9.99 Mbits/sec 0.043 ms 0/855 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.082 ms 0/856 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.024 ms 0/857 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.037 ms 0/856 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.061 ms 0/856 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.041 ms 0/857 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.19 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.034 ms 0/856 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 12.2 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/8735 (0%) sender
[SUM] 0.0-10.2 sec 2 datagrams received out-of-order
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 12.0 MBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec 0.034 ms 0/8595 (0%) receiver

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 12M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS 0
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 63579 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.49 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 0/1067 (0%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.065 ms 0/1026 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.081 ms 0/1029 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.084 ms 0/1026 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.025 ms 0/1029 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.025 ms 0/1027 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 0/1026 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.047 ms 0/1029 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.085 ms 0/1027 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.047 ms 0/1028 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 14.6 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/10482 (0%) sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 14.4 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec 0.047 ms 0/10314 (0%) receiver

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 15M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS 0
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 56550 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.85 MBytes 15.5 Mbits/sec 0.039 ms 4/1334 (0.3%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.79 MBytes 15.0 Mbits/sec 0.072 ms 0/1284 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.79 MBytes 15.0 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/1285 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.53 MBytes 12.8 Mbits/sec 0.055 ms 187/1283 (15%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.31 MBytes 11.0 Mbits/sec 0.064 ms 341/1285 (27%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.30 MBytes 10.9 Mbits/sec 0.037 ms 352/1285 (27%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.29 MBytes 10.8 Mbits/sec 0.033 ms 357/1283 (28%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.29 MBytes 10.8 Mbits/sec 0.034 ms 361/1284 (28%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.28 MBytes 10.8 Mbits/sec 0.041 ms 364/1286 (28%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.28 MBytes 10.7 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 367/1283 (29%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 18.2 MBytes 15.0 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/13104 (0%) sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 14.7 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 2333/12892 (18%) receiver

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 20M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS 0
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 63873 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.45 MBytes 20.5 Mbits/sec 0.053 ms 19/1778 (1.1%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.7 Mbits/sec 0.065 ms 457/1712 (27%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.39 MBytes 11.6 Mbits/sec 0.100 ms 717/1713 (42%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.39 MBytes 11.7 Mbits/sec 0.053 ms 713/1713 (42%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.39 MBytes 11.7 Mbits/sec 0.098 ms 714/1711 (42%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.38 MBytes 11.6 Mbits/sec 0.057 ms 719/1713 (42%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.39 MBytes 11.7 Mbits/sec 0.070 ms 713/1713 (42%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.38 MBytes 11.6 Mbits/sec 0.072 ms 718/1711 (42%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.39 MBytes 11.6 Mbits/sec 0.091 ms 717/1713 (42%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.39 MBytes 11.7 Mbits/sec 0.087 ms 712/1713 (42%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 24.3 MBytes 20.0 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/17472 (0%) sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 15.3 MBytes 12.8 Mbits/sec 0.087 ms 6199/17190 (36%) receiver

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>

It's perfect 8M-12M, beyond that it falls apart...
 
sand_man said:
Really? Mmmm, perhaps but I'm not convinced. I've run tests using my MTN LTE account with no issue. Also from another site using Telkom LTE.
Click to expand...

Yup. Here is my friends 100/100mb line on TTconnect and VoX:

Connecting to host http://iperf.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host http://iperf.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 4] local 192.168.1.7 port 60843 connected to 172.104.157.197 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 24.0 KBytes 196 Kbits/sec 23.861 ms 0/3 (0%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 23.861 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 97.5 MBytes 81.8 Mbits/sec 23.861 ms 0/3 (0%)
[ 4] Sent 3 datagrams

iperf Done.


I can't believe that's a real result. He NEVER has issues with his internet.

*EDIT he just tried again and got "Access is denied." Personally I don't trust any results that don't come from a cisp account, they always seem either wonky or outright don't work.
 
Last edited:
PBCool said:
A transit provider will always prefer their transit service to a peer. But there are some work arounds. I'll have a look for you.
Click to expand...
Almost 3 weeks later and it is still the same, are you actually doing anything about it or is this a waste of time waiting for something to happen?
 
See this was published by Afrihost.

MetroFibre Outage
MetroFibre have informed us of an outage affecting multiple estates: Hockenheim, San Marino, Ilanga Estate, Eavil Estate, Jacaranda Two, Chianti Lifestye Estate, Montreal, La Garrita, Woodlands Estate, and Bolivar. MetroFibre has dispatched technicians to investigate and resolve this issue. We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause.
 
This is what im getting on a iperf is this any good or did i do something wrong

iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 95M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 4] local 192.168.5.14 port 57954 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 4 and received packet = 5 AND SP = 4
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.42 MBytes 28.7 Mbits/sec 0.339 ms 991/1428 (69%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.70 MBytes 31.0 Mbits/sec 0.419 ms 977/1450 (67%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.53 MBytes 29.6 Mbits/sec 0.463 ms 994/1446 (69%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.34 MBytes 28.1 Mbits/sec 0.327 ms 1023/1451 (71%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.42 MBytes 28.7 Mbits/sec 0.350 ms 1013/1451 (70%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.65 MBytes 22.2 Mbits/sec 0.753 ms 1119/1458 (77%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.27 MBytes 19.0 Mbits/sec 0.898 ms 1162/1452 (80%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 4.17 MBytes 35.0 Mbits/sec 0.878 ms 918/1452 (63%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.42 MBytes 37.1 Mbits/sec 1.018 ms 892/1458 (61%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.16 MBytes 35.0 Mbits/sec 0.967 ms 909/1442 (63%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 115 MBytes 96.8 Mbits/sec 1.031 ms 10141/14759 (69%)
 
ipv6_warrior said:
Almost 3 weeks later and it is still the same, are you actually doing anything about it or is this a waste of time waiting for something to happen?
Click to expand...
He did post that the transit provider will change that will fix this for you...

Big changes like that takes time. Relax and enjoy the internet a bit too.
 
under_sky said:
This is what im getting on a iperf is this any good or did i do something wrong

iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 95M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 4] local 192.168.5.14 port 57954 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 4 and received packet = 5 AND SP = 4
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.42 MBytes 28.7 Mbits/sec 0.339 ms 991/1428 (69%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.70 MBytes 31.0 Mbits/sec 0.419 ms 977/1450 (67%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.53 MBytes 29.6 Mbits/sec 0.463 ms 994/1446 (69%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.34 MBytes 28.1 Mbits/sec 0.327 ms 1023/1451 (71%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.42 MBytes 28.7 Mbits/sec 0.350 ms 1013/1451 (70%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.65 MBytes 22.2 Mbits/sec 0.753 ms 1119/1458 (77%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.27 MBytes 19.0 Mbits/sec 0.898 ms 1162/1452 (80%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 4.17 MBytes 35.0 Mbits/sec 0.878 ms 918/1452 (63%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.42 MBytes 37.1 Mbits/sec 1.018 ms 892/1458 (61%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.16 MBytes 35.0 Mbits/sec 0.967 ms 909/1442 (63%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 115 MBytes 96.8 Mbits/sec 1.031 ms 10141/14759 (69%)
Click to expand...

That’s poor. 100Mbps line?
 
sand_man said:
That’s poor. 100Mbps line?
Click to expand...
That test seemed to give weird results but this one below looks better i think
iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
Then this is displayed, although i never ever had speed issues no matter the time or day for international traffic

iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Xpredator 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:05:06 GMT
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: Xpredator.1550963105.941590.232370fe
[ 4] local 192.168.5.14 port 54944 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 5 and received packet = 9 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 2031 and received packet = 2032 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 2291 and received packet = 2292 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 2979 and received packet = 2980 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 3574 and received packet = 3575 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 5930 and received packet = 5931 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6846 and received packet = 6847 AND SP = 4
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 6.84 MBytes 57.3 Mbits/sec 0.181 ms 1873/6988 (27%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.71 MBytes 81.5 Mbits/sec 0.192 ms 48/7322 (0.66%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.191 ms 0/7143 (0%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 24107 and received packet = 24108 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.14 MBytes 76.7 Mbits/sec 0.218 ms 162/7009 (2.3%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 30774 and received packet = 30775 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 34257 and received packet = 34258 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.47 MBytes 79.4 Mbits/sec 0.659 ms 54/7145 (0.76%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 37434 and received packet = 37435 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 40524 and received packet = 40525 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.46 MBytes 79.3 Mbits/sec 0.187 ms 61/7141 (0.85%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 49017 and received packet = 49018 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.38 MBytes 78.7 Mbits/sec 0.177 ms 149/7175 (2.1%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 54349 and received packet = 54350 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 55210 and received packet = 55211 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 55288 and received packet = 55289 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 56225 and received packet = 56226 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.20 MBytes 77.2 Mbits/sec 0.242 ms 218/7108 (3.1%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 60277 and received packet = 60278 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.39 MBytes 78.8 Mbits/sec 0.157 ms 130/7163 (1.8%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.52 MBytes 79.8 Mbits/sec 0.188 ms 94/7222 (1.3%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 74417 and received packet = 74418 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.40 MBytes 78.8 Mbits/sec 0.206 ms 52/7088 (0.73%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 83934 and received packet = 83935 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 86702 and received packet = 86703 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.46 MBytes 79.4 Mbits/sec 0.221 ms 83/7170 (1.2%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 97.1 MBytes 81.5 Mbits/sec 0.180 ms 1004/72720 (1.4%)
[ 4] Sent 72720 datagrams
[SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 14 datagrams received out-of-order
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 18.5% (5.4%u/13.1%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.
 
under_sky said:
That test seemed to give weird results but this one below looks better i think
iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
Then this is displayed, although i never ever had speed issues no matter the time or day for international traffic

iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Xpredator 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:05:06 GMT
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: Xpredator.1550963105.941590.232370fe
[ 4] local 192.168.5.14 port 54944 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 5 and received packet = 9 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 2031 and received packet = 2032 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 2291 and received packet = 2292 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 2979 and received packet = 2980 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 3574 and received packet = 3575 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 5930 and received packet = 5931 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 6846 and received packet = 6847 AND SP = 4
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 6.84 MBytes 57.3 Mbits/sec 0.181 ms 1873/6988 (27%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.71 MBytes 81.5 Mbits/sec 0.192 ms 48/7322 (0.66%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.191 ms 0/7143 (0%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 24107 and received packet = 24108 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.14 MBytes 76.7 Mbits/sec 0.218 ms 162/7009 (2.3%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 30774 and received packet = 30775 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 34257 and received packet = 34258 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.47 MBytes 79.4 Mbits/sec 0.659 ms 54/7145 (0.76%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 37434 and received packet = 37435 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 40524 and received packet = 40525 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.46 MBytes 79.3 Mbits/sec 0.187 ms 61/7141 (0.85%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 49017 and received packet = 49018 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.38 MBytes 78.7 Mbits/sec 0.177 ms 149/7175 (2.1%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 54349 and received packet = 54350 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 55210 and received packet = 55211 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 55288 and received packet = 55289 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 56225 and received packet = 56226 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.20 MBytes 77.2 Mbits/sec 0.242 ms 218/7108 (3.1%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 60277 and received packet = 60278 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.39 MBytes 78.8 Mbits/sec 0.157 ms 130/7163 (1.8%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.52 MBytes 79.8 Mbits/sec 0.188 ms 94/7222 (1.3%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 74417 and received packet = 74418 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.40 MBytes 78.8 Mbits/sec 0.206 ms 52/7088 (0.73%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 83934 and received packet = 83935 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 86702 and received packet = 86703 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.46 MBytes 79.4 Mbits/sec 0.221 ms 83/7170 (1.2%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 97.1 MBytes 81.5 Mbits/sec 0.180 ms 1004/72720 (1.4%)
[ 4] Sent 72720 datagrams
[SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 14 datagrams received out-of-order
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 18.5% (5.4%u/13.1%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.
Click to expand...
That's an interesting one. I've never seen that one before. Works for me....

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.316]
(c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.6
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Brentsw3PC 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:16 x86_64
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS -2146493952
Control connection MSS 0
Time: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:29:18 GMT
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: 5kkzrh3ap4fv2ga2eqc6e7dv62wve62qxrfa
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 49274 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test, tos 0
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.60 MBytes 80.5 Mbits/sec 0.020 ms 226/7417 (3%) (omitted)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.031 ms 0/7143 (0%) (omitted)
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.018 ms 0/7144 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.026 ms 0/7145 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.015 ms 0/7145 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.019 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.021 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.1 Mbits/sec 0.015 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.53 MBytes 79.9 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/7136 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 97.3 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/72606 (0%) sender
[SUM] 0.0-10.2 sec 2 datagrams received out-of-order
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.4 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/71428 (0%) receiver
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 13.0% (5.5%u/7.5%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>
 
Last edited:
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.316]
(c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 400M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.6
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Brentsw3PC 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:16 x86_64
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS -2146493952
Control connection MSS 0
Time: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:32:40 GMT
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: knuuspraf5xxzte3jfa3si4ymrfpxhzbqfxx
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 61921 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test, tos 0
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.026 ms 1316/37077 (3.5%) (omitted)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/35719 (0%) (omitted)
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 47.3 MBytes 397 Mbits/sec 0.021 ms 291/35715 (0.81%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.012 ms 0/35729 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.014 ms 0/35711 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.013 ms 0/35717 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/35711 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 0/35714 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.015 ms 0/35721 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 0/35712 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.024 ms 0/35698 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 47.7 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.023 ms 0/35714 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 487 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/363043 (0%) sender
[SUM] 0.0-10.2 sec 380 datagrams received out-of-order
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 476 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec 0.023 ms 291/357142 (0.081%) receiver
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 54.8% (21.3%u/33.5%s), remote/sender 13.5% (2.1%u/11.4%s)

iperf Done.
 
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.316]
(c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 500M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.6
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Brentsw3PC 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:16 x86_64
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS -2146493952
Control connection MSS 0
Time: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:39:56 GMT
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: ina527xey66fzgmvy2zl4dsvznoo5nfxh7iy
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 56214 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test, tos 0
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 58.5 MBytes 490 Mbits/sec 0.023 ms 2617/46422 (5.6%) (omitted)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 57.4 MBytes 482 Mbits/sec 0.025 ms 1642/44648 (3.7%) (omitted)
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 1392/44601 (3.1%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.012 ms 1447/44700 (3.2%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.011 ms 1421/44653 (3.2%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.052 ms 1442/44626 (3.2%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.033 ms 1419/44665 (3.2%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.011 ms 1447/44630 (3.2%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.027 ms 1421/44668 (3.2%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.013 ms 1417/44600 (3.2%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.034 ms 1417/44630 (3.2%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 57.7 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 1421/44657 (3.2%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.21 sec 608 MBytes 500 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/453773 (0%) sender
[SUM] 0.0-10.2 sec 1121 datagrams received out-of-order
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 577 MBytes 484 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 14244/446429 (3.2%) receiver
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 62.0% (22.1%u/39.9%s), remote/sender 22.8% (3.3%u/19.5%s)

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>
 
sand_man said:
That's an interesting one. I've never seen that one before. Works for me....

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17763.316]
(c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.6
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Brentsw3PC 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:16 x86_64
warning: Ignoring nonsense TCP MSS -2146493952
Control connection MSS 0
Time: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:29:18 GMT
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: 5kkzrh3ap4fv2ga2eqc6e7dv62wve62qxrfa
[ 5] local 192.168.1.147 port 49274 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test, tos 0
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.60 MBytes 80.5 Mbits/sec 0.020 ms 226/7417 (3%) (omitted)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.031 ms 0/7143 (0%) (omitted)
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.018 ms 0/7144 (0%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.026 ms 0/7145 (0%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.015 ms 0/7145 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.019 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.021 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.1 Mbits/sec 0.015 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.53 MBytes 79.9 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/7136 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 97.3 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/72606 (0%) sender
[SUM] 0.0-10.2 sec 2 datagrams received out-of-order
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.4 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.032 ms 0/71428 (0%) receiver
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 13.0% (5.5%u/7.5%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>
Click to expand...
What are you saying?
 
image132 said:
I think he's never seen the bandwidth parameter before.
Click to expand...
wingnut771 said:
What are you saying?
Click to expand...

No, I'm familiar with how the bandwidth parameters work. My line is 1Gb so technically I should be able to go close to 700M but it maxs out for me around the 500M mark.

The reason I'm so intrigued by it though, is because on the iperf3.exe -R -u -b xxxM -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za test it's totally out of whack when the M value is anything higher than 12M. The answer to my iperf anomaly woes are contained within these results. Just need someone with the political will and technical prowess to assist me.

Of course I have no idea what the iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 500M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u command is actually testing. I run the iperf tests without having a clue what they actually testing and what the results mean. Just that the percentage loss at the end of the tests needs to be as close to 0% as possible.
 
sand_man said:
No, I'm familiar with how the bandwidth parameters work. My line is 1Gb so technically I should be able to go close to 700M but it maxs out for me around the 500M mark.

The reason I'm so intrigued by it though, is because on the iperf3.exe -R -u -b xxxM -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za test it's totally out of whack when the M value is anything higher than 12M. The answer to my iperf anomaly woes are contained within these results. Just need someone with the political will and technical prowess to assist me.

Of course I have no idea what the iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 500M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u command is actually testing. I run the iperf tests without having a clue what they actually testing and what the results mean. Just that the percentage loss at the end of the tests needs to be as close to 0% as possible.
Click to expand...

My understanding of the switches are. Verbose, detailed readout. Port, self explanatory. c, specify which server to connect to. Bandwidth, again self explanatory. Omit 2, ignore the first two results on the summary line since they're usually inaccurate. R, reverse mode so you receive data from the server instead of sending it. u, means test udp instead of tcp. l, I think is buffer size.

If you want a more general overview of what iperf does. Its a detailed readout of the throughput on your line. Imagine doing a speedtest for 10 seconds but every second that speedtest is happening you are being given how much loss there is, what the transfer rate is, what the jitter is, how many packets were pushed and whether they were in order or not.

I stand to be corrected but that's my understanding of what iperf is. Hope it helps.
 
sand_man said:
No, I'm familiar with how the bandwidth parameters work. My line is 1Gb so technically I should be able to go close to 700M but it maxs out for me around the 500M mark.

The reason I'm so intrigued by it though, is because on the iperf3.exe -R -u -b xxxM -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za test it's totally out of whack when the M value is anything higher than 12M. The answer to my iperf anomaly woes are contained within these results. Just need someone with the political will and technical prowess to assist me.

Of course I have no idea what the iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 500M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u command is actually testing. I run the iperf tests without having a clue what they actually testing and what the results mean. Just that the percentage loss at the end of the tests needs to be as close to 0% as possible.
Click to expand...
If you do a local speedtest what results are you getting on your 1GB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X