CRICKET SA vs England

stepper

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
1,838
Funny comments by English fan(s) on BBC 606 Messageboard.

This one called: Michael Vaughn: I did my way part 2
Well I thought yesterday went quite well no big surprises.

Personally managed to fulfil one of my ambitions from previous artticle by getting back in the dressing room right after Straussy so he had no chance of going on about his captaincy skills. Also what a way to get out, trod on wicket I ask you.

We were soon joined by KP and then we had a little chat and our old mate Colly joined in, it was just like old times, days do not get any better than that.

Got a bit confused by KP on his mobile all the time talking about some new ground I think in India IPAL,IPL,IPIL or something like that, keeps talking about a million, don't like to upset him but you are never going to get a million people into a test ground.

Thought Colly did well, completely confused the bowlers they had no idea what he was doing with the bat, great tactics.

Good to have Freddie at 7 and therefore not out at the end, will do wonders for his batting average, might even get him over that bowler Broad who I dropped.

Anyway back to the grind
 

LancelotSA

Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
14,713
Hey, this isn't a weather thread. :mad:

Aha but it is at least South African weather so I did not derail the thread all the way to India!!!

...AND I made reference to the SA game...

...AND did not discuss Indian whirlwinds and other unrelated cr_p! ;)
 

Ou grote

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
15,472
Aha but it is at least South African weather so I did not derail the thread all the way to India!!!

...AND I made reference to the SA game...

...AND did not discuss Indian whirlwinds and other unrelated cr_p! ;)

:D

Pity the Kallis vs Flintoff duel ended so quickly :(
 

LancelotSA

Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
14,713
Those sight screens are ridiculous... it is quite obvious that from the one end with Flintoff bowling it is impossible to see the ball!

The commentators have said that England played with those sight screens but it seems obvious to me that it is the darker skies and Flintoff's angle and height causing the problem... seems crazy that they take you off for bad light when you can't see the ball but Kallis, De Villiers and now Boucher have clearly not seen some of the balls! Bit tough to bat if you can't see the ball!!!!!!
 

sand_man

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Messages
35,844
Those sight screens are ridiculous... it is quite obvious that from the one end with Flintoff bowling it is impossible to see the ball!

The commentators have said that England played with those sight screens but it seems obvious to me that it is the darker skies and Flintoff's angle and height causing the problem... seems crazy that they take you off for bad light when you can't see the ball but Kallis, De Villiers and now Boucher have clearly not seen some of the balls! Bit tough to bat if you can't see the ball!!!!!!
Lets hope by tomorrow evening Morne will be bowling from that end in equally poor light at the England middle order....
 

WonderBob

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
811
I dont think the sightscreen issues could have been that bad. It was a very important time of the game and series and I reckon Boucher just played on that a bit. He likes a scrap, and reckon he just tried to give some back to the Pommies any which way he could.

Boucher and Prince will have to grind out a lead of at least 100 tomorrow morning.
 

milomak

Honorary Master
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
12,571
i was listening on the radio on the way. listened to the over with the lbw appeal. then they gave kallis the single in the next over. now here is the thing:

i understand why they (kallis/prince) took the single. mentality wise you don't want any of the opposition to think they have the edge over you. BUT. if you can't see the ball, should you not as a team be making the decision to be defending your wicket against the bowler who is able to exploit the conditions?
 

milomak

Honorary Master
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
12,571
I dont think the sightscreen issues could have been that bad. It was a very important time of the game and series and I reckon Boucher just played on that a bit. He likes a scrap, and reckon he just tried to give some back to the Pommies any which way he could.

Boucher and Prince will have to grind out a lead of at least 100 tomorrow morning.

i doubt batsmen are going to let balls through in the manner boucher and kallis did just to get a scrap going. it's also pretty dangerous as you allow the lbw given how close some of them where.
 

WonderBob

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
811
i doubt batsmen are going to let balls through in the manner boucher and kallis did just to get a scrap going. it's also pretty dangerous as you allow the lbw given how close some of them where.

yes, of course, but I mean the way he was shouting at the Eng players and stuff.
 

WonderBob

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
811
Also, the light was no worse at the end than it was the rest of the day, and everybody else saw the ball fine, not sure exactly what the issue was.
 

WonderBob

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
811
quote from Kallis on the sightscreen issue:

"I don't think the light was an issue," said Kallis. "The dark windows above the sight screen, that was the issue.

"Let's hope common sense prevails and we get a sheet over there, otherwise we are going to get tall guys running up bowling yorkers all day.

"Hopefully the two captains can come together to sort that problem out."
 

LancelotSA

Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
14,713
I dont think the sightscreen issues could have been that bad. It was a very important time of the game and series and I reckon Boucher just played on that a bit. He likes a scrap, and reckon he just tried to give some back to the Pommies any which way he could.

So Kallis was acting when he played no stroke at about three full length deliveries and then shook his head and smiled? And then Boucher turned his head away and flinched when he appeared to lose sight of a delivery just for fun?

EDIT : OK I see this has been discussed... but it is all good and well fixing the problem now when we definitely lost one wicket, perhaps two as a result of the "window issue"
 
Last edited:

dominic

Legal Expert: Telecoms
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
7,329
huge series day today - prince boucher and the tail to knock on to a lead of 150+ and
then it is ours ours ours


irrelevant edit: Sehwag 199 not with last bat in...
 

rpm

Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
66,740
I agree - a 150 lead is what is needed. Lets hope Prince/Boucher can do it.
 

mercurial

MyBB Legend
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
40,902
Well I was really hoping that we would get a lead in excess of 200. Seems we would be lucky to get a lead of 100 even. I hope that Boucher and Prince can both make centuries or high scoring fifties.
 

LancelotSA

Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
14,713
Well my personal opinion is that even a lead of 100 will be substantial on this pitch. 200 will be great but really excessive considering this looks to be a low scoring match. I know you guys are hoping for a win by an innings but if we can get 100 and put them under extreme pressure we should still be able to knock off the deficit no probs.
 

WonderBob

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
811
So Kallis was acting when he played no stroke at about three full length deliveries and then shook his head and smiled? And then Boucher turned his head away and flinched when he appeared to lose sight of a delivery just for fun?

EDIT : OK I see this has been discussed... but it is all good and well fixing the problem now when we definitely lost one wicket, perhaps two as a result of the "window issue"

which two wickets did we lose?

The windows were there the whole day, no like someone went and painted them black during the tea break.
 
Top