Here is a reasonably simple explanation of the technology and how it works ( especially the first few slides).
One of the issues about any radio technology is that most work best when there is full Line Of Site between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna.
MIMO (and its variants, SIMO, etc) exploit the fact that radio signals will bounce off buildings, trees and other objects via multiple paths. The multi-path signals appear as noise in more traditional technologies. MIMO exploits multi-path signals, leading to the claim that LOS is not required anymore. But over the years ( the technology first showed up in research papers way back in the late nineties), all sorts of other benefits have identified, including better spectrum utilisation and or improved data throughput.
The CSIR locally developed a test network which has very successfully being delivering Internet access in a number of rural areas for quite a long time.
The antenna technology can be used in just about any radio band. There are however issues with its indiscriminate deployment as the technology can adversely affect existing services in a band.
Hence, why I would hope that CW would be a little more open about what frequency bands they propose to use. The terms E- and V- band are just too open to incorrect interpretation.
http://cdn.mobiusconsulting.com/papers/IEEE-Wireless-MIMO-Sharony.pdf
There may be better references around but this is the one I have readily at hand based on some work I did way back in 2005/2006 on the concept.
More .....
The big drawback of all these wireless technologies ( recently highlighted in Brian Armstrong's presentation at the myBB conference) is that a high capacity backhaul network, very close to the end user is required. Attempts to get this to work over large areas have not shown anywhere near the returns claimed, be they technical or commercial.
So with the advent of FTTC, FTTB and FTTH, the fibre networks are now available to feed "base stations" very close to the end user, thus "solving" the backhaul problem. BUT the technology requires a minimum of "X" points which can be used to establish a mesh of nodes.
I am a bit concerned that the idea is that you can use a FTTH technology such as GPON to act as the backhaul ??? But AON might be feasible? Certainly Metro E will work. And immediately, one can see where the 100 Mbps limit is coming from even if the last inch technology can achieve better, it will be limited by the backhaul available.
( The age old problem of contention on top of more contention)
Latency? Now that is going to be interesting because the systems I was involved in 2006 introduced a sizeable dose of added latency. Suitable for gamers ??? Maybe not is my call.
But to be used to "extend" the range of a FTTH deployment with a last inch wireless and "normal" Internet access? Will work okay.
I would like to see some tests first before just falling for this idea, knowing what the CSIR found out in their trials.