Oh, i ran out of arguments, have I? What arguments have i run out of, exactly?
You say my photos are of balloons. (hilarious to say the least - i would recommend you find a good optometrist because that assertion is what i would expect at least a half-blind person to say)
Why do i say these objects are of an ET/interdimensional origin?
Because i literally see them after performing the ce-5 protocols. What is the ce-5 protocols all about?
It's about changing your brainwave to a different frequency to "connect" with ETs and invite them to show themselves from your own back garden.
But i guess that's just coincidence, huh?
So i perform this ce-5 thing, and then these strange objects show up in the sky.
But nope!
I cannot be, right?
It must just be coincidence, right?
Yet, coincidences cannot even be mathematically nor statistically proven.
So i have at least 2 data points of evidence : 1. I perform an activity which is literally designed to get ETs to show up, and 2. I take photographic and video evidence of such events.
That's not half bad.
At least i have 2 data points of proof that what i'm saying is correct, and you have none whatsoever.
So amongst us all, i have literally provided far more evidence of what i am asserting, and all you can do is post cynical comments with nothing to backup to your claims.
Further, my camera is more than good enough to discern any type of balloon from an unknown object.
So it boils down to this : I have provided more evidence for my claims, than anyone here has about theirs.
And, if you think my photos are fakes, like some kind of macro photos of a sugar crystal, well, there is nothing i can do to change your mind other than recommend you take my photos to an expert