How the WITS student voting will work

Sammy, Sammy, you are no different to the millions of African beggars out there.
With the same demands, give me , give me, give me.
We demand.
Oh look it's another beggar, oh look one with a skill to break and burn stuff.
The money has to come from somewhere Sammy.
Your notion that the future middle class will be shackled is just another begging bowl tactic.
What you going to do about a car loan and a home loan ?
Complain you are shackled burn the bank down again and again?
You want to climb the ladder of life it's the same worldwide, except in Africa apparently where Sammy wants his nappy and dummy at the same time.

The truth of education is that once you get it you will be like thousands of black South Africans disappointed at the ANC and go work in the U.K.

Your world of rhetoric and double speak will backfire in your face.

Stop begging and start studying.
 
Why not do a sliding scale. Reduce the fees every year by taxing the increasing amounts of graduates that come out after this rule. It's not fair to tax people that had to pay their own way.

That still wont he enough until some 40 years into the future when the first taxed graduates retire and the entire base pays the tax. It's no different than having to pay for your own kids/grandkids education. You're just doing it in smaller amounts over a longer period of time.


I don't see what's wrong with NSFAS.

You're still paying it in large amounts after you graduate. And as always it doesn't cater for the missing middle

So we have moved from a formal study to "common sense"? Shift, shift, again :). Anyway, common sense says you do not burn down the institution you want free education in. Also, common sense says you do not prevent those who want to study, from studying.

Anyway - isn't this your study time? :)


Maybe for you to understand that formal study posted, you need common sense. What had been burnt at Wits? And as for preventing people who want to study from studying, that's not a thing. I for one am almost done with the course material given to us in most lectures what's stopping people from studying just the same?

Oh and I see you didn't even notice that I'd BEEN gone.
 
Sammy, Sammy, you are no different to the millions of African beggars out there.
With the same demands, give me , give me, give me.
We demand.
Oh look it's another beggar, oh look one with a skill to break and burn stuff.
The money has to come from somewhere Sammy.
Your notion that the future middle class will be shackled is just another begging bowl tactic.
What you going to do about a car loan and a home loan ?
Complain you are shackled burn the bank down again and again?
You want to climb the ladder of life it's the same worldwide, except in Africa apparently where Sammy wants his nappy and dummy at the same time.

The truth of education is that once you get it you will be like thousands of black South Africans disappointed at the ANC and go work in the U.K.

Your world of rhetoric and double speak will backfire in your face.

Stop begging and start studying.
Ok
 

Still waiting for the results of said police investigations of that 2015 night btw. The protests were pretty much over.

Secondly that Umthombo one?

A group of Wits students and non-students embarked on a protest at its Braamfontein campus on Monday.

http://m.news24.com/news24/SouthAfrica/News/protesters-start-fire-in-wits-lecture-hall-20160404

I doubt the actual perps were students. Just saying.

When will we se the results?

Midday apparently.

When will we se the results?
 
It's not fair to tax people that had to pay their own way.

Yes, I don't support the graduate tax thing at all.

I had to borrow vast amounts to pay for my studies, and repay it over a period.

My dad/mom also contributed to the extent that they could.

NSFAS should just be extended, and more controls set up to make sure that people repay.

This isn't Sweden, we have a miniscule tax base.

Too much of an entitlement attitude here.

In the USA students have to take out massive loans in order to complete their studies.

What makes the students so special here, that they need to get benefits only available in a very few wealthy social democracies ?

Free up to secondary level, fine. Tertiary you have to pay.
 
Oh, and decolonised education isn't of value to anyone.

If you want that you should go to a special private institution (one wouldn't be able to call it a university as educational standards wouldn't apply), that gets zero subsidies from government.
 
Some common sense. Free education will remove financial barriers for students and the above study becomes relevant to each and every one of those students.

Sammy, you only care about the students. You do know we have millions of poor South Africans which are not students, right?

We should channel money towards basic education, feeding schemes for under-nourished children, clean water and basic sanitation for the millions of poor citizens.

We should not bow to the students just because they shout the loudest.

As I said, we can look at free tertiary education one day then we are a developed country.
 
Nothing wrong with paying for a quality education. We can cater for the missing middle by creating a partnership between the banks and the Government.
Well if those who used NSFAS paid it back I'm sure the missing middle can be included.

Even those with parents that can afford it might look into NSFAS, if they're the independent type. Paying for your education makes you appreciate it more.
 
Well if those who used NSFAS paid it back I'm sure the missing middle can be included.

Even those with parents that can afford it might look into NSFAS, if they're the independent type. Paying for your education makes you appreciate it more.
But that defeats the objective. The objective is to get Free education. Not to PayBackTheMoney.
 
Nothing wrong with paying for a quality education. We can cater for the missing middle by creating a partnership between the banks and the Government.

A graduate tax still ensures you're paying for it but if much less of a burden on the individual.

Sammy, you only care about the students. You do know we have millions of poor South Africans which are not students, right?

We should channel money towards basic education, feeding schemes for under-nourished children, clean water and basic sanitation for the millions of poor citizens.

We should not bow to the students just because they shout the loudest.

As I said, we can look at free tertiary education one day then we are a developed country.

No one is saying funds should be redirected from any of those issues.

Well if those who used NSFAS paid it back I'm sure the missing middle can be included.

Even those with parents that can afford it might look into NSFAS, if they're the independent type. Paying for your education makes you appreciate it more.

But people aren't paying it back are they? So the programme has basically failed. It's time for a new solution.

But that defeats the objective. The objective is to get Free education. Not to PayBackTheMoney.

Try again.
 
Last edited:
A graduate tax still ensures you're paying for it but if much less of a burden on the individual.



No one is saying funds should be redirected from any of those issues.



But people aren't paying it back at they? So the programme has basically failed. It's time for a new solution.




Try again.

No, its time to enforce the current solution correctly..
 
Still waiting for the results of said police investigations of that 2015 night btw. The protests were pretty much over.

Secondly that Umthombo one?



http://m.news24.com/news24/SouthAfrica/News/protesters-start-fire-in-wits-lecture-hall-20160404

I doubt the actual perps were students. Just saying.



Midday apparently.

You are shifting the goalposts once more, from "what had been burnt?" to "police investigations are still to be completed" to "doubt the perpetrators were students".

Just admit that some of your fellow protesters are vandals and arsonists instead of making these weak excuses all the time.
 
You are shifting the goalposts once more, from "what had been burnt?" to "police investigations are still to be completed" to "doubt the perpetrators were students".

Just admit that some of your fellow protesters are vandals and arsonists instead of making these weak excuses all the time.


Ok ke what has been burnt by #feesmustfall students? Would have thought your small mind would get the question in its original form. Oh and btw, that April protest had next to no support from the FeesMustFall protesters. Calling them fellow protesters is highly misleading especially since the same people from that protest want nothing to do with this one. Goes to show their protest had nothing to do with students or fees but rather some EFF agenda especially with the deliberate bringing of non student EFF members onto campus.
 
Ok ke what has been burnt by #feesmustfall students? Would have thought your small mind would get the question in its original form. Oh and btw, that April protest had next to no support from the FeesMustFall protesters. Calling them fellow protesters is highly misleading especially since the same people from that protest want nothing to do with this one. Goes to show their protest had nothing to do with students or fees but rather some EFF agenda especially with the deliberate bringing of non student EFF members onto campus.

There you have shifted the goalposts once again. Now it's not a question of "students", but "FeesMustFall students". You've gone from "what has been burned" to "police investigations have not been completed" to "perpetrators probably weren't students" to "it wasn't FeesMustFall students".

Your assumption that none of the student protesters have been involved in any acts of violence has no concrete evidence to support it. On the contrary, the balance of probability supports the conclusion that student protesters have been responsible for various acts of arson, vandalism, and criminality. And you're blinded by your love of the FeesMustFall movement to acknowledge the obvious. You are deluded.
 
There you have shifted the goalposts once again. Now it's not a question of "students", but "FeesMustFall students". You've gone from "what has been burned" to "police investigations have not been completed" to "perpetrators probably weren't students" to "it wasn't FeesMustFall students".

Your assumption that none of the student protesters have been involved in any acts of violence has no concrete evidence to support it. On the contrary, the balance of probability supports the conclusion that student protesters have been responsible for various acts of arson, vandalism, and criminality. And you're blinded by your love of the FeesMustFall movement to acknowledge the obvious. You are deluded.

Uhm. You're talking about the protesters which are #feemustfall students. If you want to use the word students, fine, then it wasnt students, nick picker. They are interchangeable.I thought you'd troll harder this time.

It's actually gone no further than you accusing the movement of arson and me pointing out that none of that is verifiable because no. 1 the protests were over. no 2. Considering that tiny sections of an already tiny EFFSC were equal in number if not outnumbered by non student EFF members says the probability is of it being non students or a 50/50 chance of either.

I find every single conversation with you to be a grand waste of time. I've fed the troll, its time for it to go away.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X