The Manchester United Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The trouble is starting again - please refrain from any personal comments or attacks. If this does not end we will have to lock this thread.
 
The trouble is starting again - please refrain from any personal comments or attacks. If this does not end we will have to lock this thread.

:(

I would prefer the permanent removal of the offending members. It is a small minority ruining it for the rest of us.
 
It has been a rough time here over the last week or so. A lot of people getting warnings and whatnot for personal attacks and making this not a nice place to be.

Hectic!

Isnt a bit girly to report someone for debating or sharing a different view?:confused:

Or is this a forum where everybody has to agree?

I dont know, please enlighten me. :confused:
 
Hectic!

Isnt a bit girly to report someone for debating or sharing a different view?:confused:

Or is this a forum where everybody has to agree?

I dont know, please enlighten me. :confused:

It might seem childish but things were getting out of hand. There is no point in even posting here if everything said is going to be met with an insult, which is against the rules of the forum anyway.

Seems to make sense to me...And the rest of the internet forums out there, which also have the same rules.
 
It might seem childish but things were getting out of hand. There is no point in even posting here if everything said is going to be met with an insult, which is against the rules of the forum anyway.

Seems to make sense to me...And the rest of the internet forums out there, which also have the same rules.

Well i dont agree with insults.

I have been on internet forums for more than a decade. I hope it goes both ways tho. Both parties should get a ban or warning not just certain users.

Perfect case would be Catch 31, did he get a warning?
 
Well i dont agree with insults.

I have been on internet forums for more than a decade. I hope it goes both ways tho. Both parties should get a ban or warning not just certain users.

Perfect case would be Catch 31, did he get a warning?

You'd have to ask him that. Warnings are not really in the public domain. If the post was reported and was considered to be an insult, then yes, I am sure it did result in an infraction being issued.

You must forgive me if I suspect you of being one of the aforementioned trouble-makers using a different nick...but things have been getting really ugly over the last few weeks :(

This used to be a fun place to come and air views...
 
You'd have to ask him that. Warnings are not really in the public domain. If the post was reported and was considered to be an insult, then yes, I am sure it did result in an infraction being issued.

You must forgive me if I suspect you of being one of the aforementioned trouble-makers using a different nick...but things have been getting really ugly over the last few weeks :(

This used to be a fun place to come and air views...
No I agree that it has been one sided, good example is catch someone will start a thread and the first thing he will do is put a insult in it.

Good example is the chelsea thread where the first post was to call the op a troll.
 
huh? Aforementioned trouble makers?

I still think that reporting is a bit girly. We are all adults here (i hope). This is what foruming is about. Debates, views, opinions, this is what a forum is based on.

If we all suppose to stick to groups it really defeats the purpose of having a forum.
 
No I agree that it has been one sided, good example is catch someone will start a thread and the first thing he will do is put a insult in it.

Good example is the chelsea thread where the first post was to call the op a troll.

Did he get a warning or get banned for that?:confused:
 
huh? Aforementioned trouble makers?

I still think that reporting is a bit girly. We are all adults here (i hope). This is what foruming is about. Debates, views, opinions, this is what a forum is based on.

If we all suppose to stick to groups it really defeats the purpose of having a forum.

You said you were not in favour of insults,. so you must be happy that the people who did the insulting got warnings/bans?
 
You said you were not in favour of insults,. so you must be happy that the people who did the insulting got warnings/bans?

Well i am happy to an extent. But i do believe that if you are a di*k and act like one, you deserved to be reffered to as one.

I guess it depends on the insult and the context of the debate. If the user is a trouble maker and only insults other users, then he should get a warning or a ban.
 
Well i am happy to an extent. But i do believe that if you are a di*k and act like one, you deserved to be reffered to as one.

I guess it depends on the insult and the context of the debate. If the user is a trouble maker and only insults other users, then he should get a warning or a ban.

i hope you are not calling me a d1ck?

So we are in agreeance about the bans then - good.

Moving on.

Anyone actually want to talk about man United?
 
i hope you are not calling me a d1ck?

So we are in agreeance about the bans then - good.

Moving on.

Anyone actually want to talk about man United?

:D Did i call you a dick? If the shoe fits :D

Why u so defensive? I never called anybody anything. Find it funny you think im insilting you.:)

Ya, well if someone was acting like dumbass, i would expect my fellow forumites to call him a dumbass. We are not in primary school :)
 
:D Did i call you a dick? If the shoe fits :D

Why u so defensive? I never called anybody anything. Find it funny you think im insilting you.:)

Ya, well if someone was acting like dumbass, i would expect my fellow forumites to call him a dumbass. We are not in primary school :)

We are not in primary school but namecalling is allowed??? Hahaha, that actually made me laugh...

Again, another invitation to talk about football...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X