-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: How do you normally pay for purchases in stores?
ICASA declares WiFi hotspots legal
- Thread starter Mux
- Start date
]"the authority will amend the provision in the Radio Regulation (Notice 1790 of 1995) in such a way as to delete the entire phrase “and between the computer systems of the same user”."
Does this mean the computer systems must be on the same property still? Or is that the next step...
Does this mean the computer systems must be on the same property still? Or is that the next step...
Quazzi
Well-Known Member
Yep, thats exactly what it means [V]
chopsky
Expert Member
Oh big **** Mux.
Telkom are still dix. How does it help that we can now have Wifi LANs on our own premisis?! PRAISE THE LORD! [xx(]
Another instance of Telkom trying to sound greater than they really are.
They've done almost ****all to help almost anyone
Telkom are still dix. How does it help that we can now have Wifi LANs on our own premisis?! PRAISE THE LORD! [xx(]
Another instance of Telkom trying to sound greater than they really are.
They've done almost ****all to help almost anyone
jgoosen
Well-Known Member
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by chopsky</i>
<br />Oh big **** Mux.
Telkom are still dix. How does it help that we can now have Wifi LANs on our own premisis?! PRAISE THE LORD! [xx(]
Another instance of Telkom trying to sound greater than they really are.
They've done almost ****all to help almost anyone
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Yeah Helps **********
<br />Oh big **** Mux.
Telkom are still dix. How does it help that we can now have Wifi LANs on our own premisis?! PRAISE THE LORD! [xx(]
Another instance of Telkom trying to sound greater than they really are.
They've done almost ****all to help almost anyone
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Yeah Helps **********
Nickste
Expert Member
Lo all.
Yeah, but at least it is a step forward. Next step is to get it legal over premises boundaries!
Lets take that step [
]
Chow, Nick
Nick Smit
[email protected]
Yeah, but at least it is a step forward. Next step is to get it legal over premises boundaries!
Lets take that step [
]Chow, Nick
Nick Smit
[email protected]
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Nickste</i>
<br />
Yeah, but at least it is a step forward. Next step is to get it legal over premises boundaries!
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks for the reply Nickste. That's the reason I posted the article in the 1st place. At least it's a tiny step forward. For the same effort ICASA could have taken the negative approach of declaring it illegal altogether. I don't like the limitations either.
Guys don't shoot the messenger[B)]
<br />
Yeah, but at least it is a step forward. Next step is to get it legal over premises boundaries!
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks for the reply Nickste. That's the reason I posted the article in the 1st place. At least it's a tiny step forward. For the same effort ICASA could have taken the negative approach of declaring it illegal altogether. I don't like the limitations either.
Guys don't shoot the messenger[B)]