NameOfBeast
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Messages
- 874
- Reaction score
- 0
Paul Trewhela writes in politicsweb:
http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=108539&sn=Detail
There is no question that the calibre of leadership and political writing by the SACP today is not a patch on that of its leaders of 50, or 40, or 30 years ago. It nevertheless holds the advantage of the practical heritage of that tradition. In a sense, it is living off its capital.
...
The failure of the SACP to present a thoroughgoing critique of the gutter-level of discourse initiated by its ally, the ANC Youth League, as articulated by its president, Julius Malema, brings this once extraordinary political party down to the same level in the gutter.
The many opponents of the new Lekota-Shilowa grouping inside (or outside) the ANC are not wrong when they accuse its leaders of past misdemeanours and bad practice, from when they held the high seat in public life. The really significant fact, however, is that, like it or not, this grouping has turned in its public discourse to a similar set of concepts and sensibility as that of the most honourable and morally consistent writers and thinkers in contemporary black public life in South Africa. That is a very good thing. In the battle of ideas, the logic of the argument for political dictatorship - the argument of "Kill for Zuma", of the strategy to "hegemonise state power" - is already looking tawdry, like something dirty in the gutter, which it is.
The future character of black political thinking and argument in South Africa is already being articulated by the critics of the "Kill for Zuma" party.
http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=108539&sn=Detail