South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The W range of cameras are in general evry good amnd battery life is very good.
The images are also quite good although at higher ISO's my pics are very noisy, but then again this is a compact camera not a DSLR, so I dont really shoot night shots and keep the ISO pretty low. See my Flickt (In my sig) for shots taken with a W55
No - unfortunately it's a limitation of sensors.ISO, Im not exactly sure how it works, but basically it sets the light sensitivity.
Thats why you would use a high ISO at night on your P&S to allow for a better image seeing the sensor (?) is more sensitive to the light it receives. But my pics tend to come out noisy at ISO 800 and 1000. Maybe because I dont use a tripod.
As for my flickr pics, thanks, I usually use the P setting (Program auto) and set my own exposure, metering, ISO and white balance settings.
I kinda to an extent was factually correct in the beginning but I started going waywards from the middle forthNo - unfortunately it's a limitation of sensors.
ISO, on a digital camera, is largely artificial - it essentially like boosting the gain on a walkie talkie to make it more sensitive - the result is invariably more noise the higher you go. Point and shoots are more susceptible because their sensors are smaller and more densely packed than you would find on a dSLR.
Awesome pics btw.![]()
Maybe leave this one to Bwana, I think you would generally use a higher ISO for night shots, but having a much longer exposure time would be better. But Im not all too sure.Surely you wouldn't always use high ISO for night time shots? Surely it depends on the situation?
I thought - only from my limited Google searches - that it depends on the situation. Like, for example, if its people then high ISO is alright - but if it's still landscapes, then a shutter open wider with a lower ISO is better.
Right photo folk?![]()