kilps said:
Thanks for the advice ...... If i am in a good location would you recoment it over adsl? Thanks
I've had iBurst for about three weeks now, we work with ADSL at the office. To be honest, anything that's as far as possible away from Telkom is a huge plus! I'm not just being scynical... it's an experience thing that I (we at the office and other people) had with Telkom. Something breaks with Telkom, it takes 4 days to fix... they don't realize that you have a business - or even just "online" life - to run. Something breaks with iBurst, and WBS is on it. Yes the service has not been what it could be, but remember they have not launched 100% yet.
Yes, ADSL is more stable with pings etc, but that's nowhere near something that Telkom did... that's the nature of the beast. Wireless is naturally this way... all over the world. It's what the technology do.
Personally I think Telkom is one of the #1 reasons SA can't get our of being a third world country... that ant people's attitude: People don't realize yet what standards of service are. And Telkom knows this, and uses this against us. WBS on the other hand goes the extra mile to make things better in terms of service: Helpline until 23:00 at night... Telkom people will burn strike about **** like that...
Anyways... back to the topic... I would go for iBurst again in a heartbeat, even though I've had my hickups & didn't expect it to be like this, but that was just because I expected a copper wire with stable pings. You get a lot more: Mobility (if you take the PCMCIA one even more mobility), Excellent Service (in comparason with Telkom), fast initial up-time (ADSL will take you at least 6 weeks to get, iBurst - 24hours at most... it took me 3 hours)
Well done iBurst (WBS)!!!! But keep on pushing te be better and better and you'll soon dominate the Southern Hemisphere.
PS: Oh ya, and Telkom is only in SA... wtf do they know about standards? WBS (iBurst) is now in Australia (1st World Country) and then off course in SA.