Cause Of Destruction Of WTC Discovered: Active Thermite

R

Redeemed

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
2,916
Reaction score
14
Published: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 4:01 a.m.

As disturbing as 9/11 was, the peer-reviewed paper of Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen is causing shockwaves around the world.

In the paper, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol. 2 (2009)," Dr. Harrit and eight other scientists from Denmark, the United States and Australia report the actual cause of the destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 in New York almost eight years ago.

Nano-thermite, a mixture of aluminum and rust powder, reacts to intense heat of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, producing molten iron and an effective explosion. It can be used as rocket fuel and contains more energy than dynamite. Over 10 tons have been estimated to have been found in Manhattan near the site. While thermite can be bought by anyone for welding (which produces iron), the nano process is performed by and for military uses only.

In an interview with Germany's gulli.com, Dr. Harrit was asked how the substance could have been placed in the towers. Mark Loizeaux, an expert on demolition and whose company was assigned the cleanup of Ground Zero, has claimed to know nothing about the existence of nano thermite. Dr. Harrit refused to speculate, calling instead for a criminal investigation. When asked if a copy of the paper had been sent to the FBI, he responded, "Yes. A copy has actually been sent to (the) FBI. I am not in a position to give a full account of the response, but as I recall, it was surprisingly receptive."
Click to expand...
Link
 
I'm not even going to BOTHER reading that load of tripe...

The "cause" has not been discovered... its a scientists opinion. And please do tell how they got in excess of 10 TONS of the stuff into strategic places in the building with nobody noticing?.. hmmm?
 
Probably because it is bollocks...

I am sure flying a plane of that size into a building, any building, would be enough to bring it down..
 
hj2k_x said:
Probably because it is bollocks...

I am sure flying a plane of that size into a building, any building, would be enough to bring it down..
Click to expand...

In the history of aviation on the this planet, no other building and surrounding ones(metal frames etc) has ever come down due to only plane impact and subsequent metal smelting in as short a time.
 
hmmm, its so easy to get stuff in the buildings at night when most if not all the people have gone home. routine maintenace is one cover and cleaning of the building is another.

even if a plane could have brought down each of those buildings, which plane brought down building 7, oh i remember, NONE AT ALL.
 
krycor said:
In the history of aviation on the this planet, no other building and surrounding ones(metal frames etc) has ever come down due to only plane impact and subsequent metal smelting in as short a time.
Click to expand...

Has a plane of that size ever hit a building of that size?
 
ToxicBunny said:
I'm not even going to BOTHER reading that load of tripe...

The "cause" has not been discovered... its a scientists opinion. And please do tell how they got in excess of 10 TONS of the stuff into strategic places in the building with nobody noticing?.. hmmm?
Click to expand...

The same way nobody originally noticed when the US military was funding and training known terrorists and sworn enemies of the union?

Faking a moon landing - now that would be something hard to keep quiet. Sneaking a few hundred kilos of explosives into buildings which see 100 000 people go in and out their doors daily- a lot easier.
 
Last edited:
Ok, getting 10 tons of stuff into a building is not difficult... did you miss the "strategic" aspect, They would have had to get the "Active Thermite" onto the superstructure to do any significant damage, and also who's to say the combination of Jet Fuel, Flames and the materials in the building didn't "create" the remnants of active thermite?
 
ToxicBunny said:
Ok, getting 10 tons of stuff into a building is not difficult... did you miss the "strategic" aspect, They would have had to get the "Active Thermite" onto the superstructure to do any significant damage, and also who's to say the combination of Jet Fuel, Flames and the materials in the building didn't "create" the remnants of active thermite?
Click to expand...

I was responding to your questioning the logistics of smuggling in 10 tons of explosives. I have no idea what "active thermite" is, and i know little to nothing of the physic theories of the WTC collapse.
 
images


images


hmmm, these eyes of mine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X