Stone film says U.S. demonises Chavez, other leaders

Fieldy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
381
Reaction score
0
Location
South Africa.
Oliver Stone is a good guy, and I like that he comes out in support of Chavez. The Man has done a lot of good for the forgotten people of his country. I especially like that he points out what the IMF does, and how it exploits poorer countries.

Stone film says U.S. demonises Chavez, other leaders

Director Oliver Stone says the U.S. media and government have demonised Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and other leftist South American leaders, and argues in a new film that they were right to stand up to Washington.

Chavez in particular has earned a reputation for his outspoken criticism of U.S. policy, and in Stone's documentary "South of the Border" he is sympathetically portrayed as a hero of the people who refuses to be bullied.

Originally an attempt to redress what Stone saw as unfair treatment of Chavez by broadcasters and newspapers, South of the Border turned into a bigger project and included interviews not only with Chavez but with six other presidents in the region.

"I think the movie, if you've seen it, shows very clearly the level of stupidity in the kind of broad statements that are made about Mr. Chavez," Stone told reporters in Venice, where South of the Border has its world premiere on Monday.

"But I didn't want to make a movie only about the American media's attacks. I felt that that was too small for what this man is about. This man is a big phenomenon.

"So we travelled in a road trip kind of movie to visit these other presidents and we saw the positive side of what is going on, the sweeping change in this region. It's a very important historical phenomenon that is ... ignored in America."

South of the Border combines clips of U.S. broadcasters and commentators describing Chavez, one of them comparing him to Hitler, with interviews and news footage of economic upheaval across South America during the last decade.

Stone points the finger of blame at the International Monetary Fund, which he says imposed "neo-liberal," U.S.-led conditions in return for loans, and hails today's leaders for wresting back control of their resources.

Chavez, and other leaders including Bolivia's Evo Morales and Argentina's Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, criticise the fund, and voice support for greater regional cooperation.

"Each one of these countries ... is in for a struggle," Stone said. "The idea that Chavez has expressed ... is 'Let's unify, let's stay together here because we are up against a giant', not only the U.S. government giant but against corporations that are multinational and very strong."

Asked about anti-Chavez demonstrations over the weekend in Caracas involving thousands of people, Stone replied:

"Chavez continues to remain very popular in Venezuela and he keeps getting elected. Without doubt social improvement has been extreme in Venezuela. There are many problems still but it's a wonderful change that's occurred since 2000."

And questioned whether Chavez would attend the gala premiere in Venice, he replied: "I cannot say yes, and I cannot say no."

South of the Border looks like a movie made in a hurry, with soundmen and cameramen often in shot.

It includes amusing scenes as when Chavez is riding around his childhood yard on a bicycle when it buckles underneath him, and Kirchner complaining as she waits for someone to bring her a photograph: "Men can be slow. My god!"

Stone said he had been in talks with Iran to make a documentary about President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad but that scheduling on both sides had prevented it.

"I was very interested because I thought we were going to go to war in Iran," he said. "If we had been more successful in Iraq, I have no doubts that we would have been more involved in the Iranian situation now."
 
Stone is a moron. He thinks the U.S invaded Cambodia because Nixon watched the movie Patton. If that doesn't qualify you as a kook nothing would :rolleyes:

Any mention of his old flame Mugabe in the film?
 
Ermm.. According to YOU.. Stone is a moron.

But I think you are only saying he's a Moron coz he ripped off your Buddy George W in his movie.

Stone is a patriot and a genuine guy. Not many of them in Hollywood.
 
Ermm.. According to YOU.. Stone is a moron.

But I think you are only saying he's a Moron coz he ripped off your Buddy George W in his movie.

No he's a moron because he compares the suppression of Scientology in Germany to Nazi oppression and so on.

Stone is a patriot and a genuine guy. Not many of them in Hollywood.

Yeah as if a individual could get away with attacking the regimes he so loves if they happened to be a citizen living there...

Rubbish he's your typical Hollywood hypocrite who lives in the evil empire milking capitalism for all it's worth while attacking it and praising tin pot socialist dictators who have no time for the liberties he abuses :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
You prove to be more of a fascist with every post.

he is allowed to have an opinion and express his opinion about scientology, even if it is a dumbass cult. he is not a practicing scientologist.

Chavez is the Nelson Mandela of Venezuela, only you wouldn't know about it coz he has been demonized on CNN, and Sky News. Rupert Murdoch's indoctrination has worked very well on you.
 
You prove to be more of a fascist with every post.

he is allowed to have an opinion and express his opinion about scientology, even if it is a dumbass cult. he is not a practicing scientologist.

Go read my post again because you've obviously missed the point


Chavez is the Nelson Mandela of Venezuela, only you wouldn't know about it coz he has been demonized on CNN, and Sky News. Rupert Murdoch's indoctrination has worked very well on you.

On the contrary that comparison is a far more accurate assessment then the rest of the drivel you promote.
 
Not a big fan of Chavez personally, he is popular and has strong suppport in his country even though most of the independent media in venezeula is anti-Chavez.

I like Evo though but he is very strong suppoter of land reform for natives which is causing tensions.
 
This is the result of too much drug taking in the 60's

60s? The guy is probably stoned out of his mind at this very moment.

New Oliver Stone 9/11 Film Introduces 'Single Plane' Theory

NEW YORK—Academy Award-winning director Oliver Stone said Monday that his new film World Trade Center unveils "compelling and controversial" new evidence that a single plane was responsible for all four collisions in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001.
Enlarge Image
"There's no way anyone can ever deny there was only one plane."
"Get ready to go through the looking glass here, people," Stone told reporters at a Manhattan press conference before an advance screening of the movie, which premieres Wednesday. "The film you are about to see is going to blow the lid off the 9/11 Commission's official report and expose a conspiracy that reaches the highest levels of government."
World Trade Center, which stars Nicolas Cage as a dedicated Port Authority officer who stumbles on secret evidence amid the rubble and carnage of the terrorist attack, tells a story quite different from what Stone called "the official government line" about the event. According to the film, at 8:46 a.m., a lone commercial airliner flew diagonally through the North Tower of the World Trade Center, maintained a circular holding pattern for approximately 17 minutes, then struck the South Tower before heading to the Pentagon.
Stone
After its collision with the center of American military operations, the so-called "magic plane"—which variously and ingeniously identified itself to air-traffic controllers as "American Airlines Flight 11," "United Airlines Flight 175," "American Airlines Flight 77" and "United Airlines Flight 93"—took to the skies once again, landing at a top-secret "black-ops" Air Force base in West Virginia, where it was reloaded with a group of clones from another shadowy government program that Stone described as "shocking."
Stone, who said he did not have time to explore the clone angle in the three-and-a-half-hour film, plans to do so in the sequel, September 12.
In a gripping sequence, undercover agents transmit pre-recorded cell-phone messages intended to fool loved ones and relatives with a false cover story as the aircraft heads to its final, prearranged crash site in the fields of southwestern Pennsylvania.
Enlarge Image

Viewers of the advance screening agreed that the most striking and pivotal scene was Cage's character's discovery of security-camera footage that affirmed the single-plane theory. Showing his skeptical but supportive wife the footage frame by frame, Cage notices that the so-called "first" plane, which, according to official, whitewashed reports, detonated upon impact with the North Tower in the initial collision, actually banks "back and to the left, circling for about 17 minutes, and then diving into the other tower." He repeats the phrase over and over in increasing intensity, toggling back and forth between individual frames while the music swells and the emotional drama rises to a fever pitch.
"After seeing that sequence, there's no way anyone can ever deny again that there was only one plane in the airspace over the eastern seaboard that morning," Stone said.
"I am the most important filmmaker working today," he added.
Early public reaction to the film has been skeptical. Many 9/11 conspiracy theorists claim Stone is presenting an exploitative, far-fetched, and manipulative Hollywood version of the pain and suffering—including eye strain and carpal tunnel syndrome—they have undergone during their countless hours on the Internet in the tragedy's aftermath.
Despite the controversy, Stone stands by his film. "This is a story that needs to be told, in a reality that only I can bring to the big screen," Stone said. "I realize it will be hard to accept for those unable to confront the truth, but I can't hide my head in the sand like some goddamn ostrich. To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards out of men."

:rolleyes:
 
Chavez is suppressing free speech in his country, and that makes him an enemy of Liberty. Sic Semper Tyrannus, is all I got to say.
 
He has a hard time being president of Venezuela with most of the private broadcasters being right wing, US backed and deeply anti chavez. They broadcast many false reports about Chavez and his government has stopped renewing licenses.

I think the same thing would happen in South Africa if we had private broadcasters spewing lies about Zuma or Mandela.

Fortunately for him he is still very popular among the middle to lower classes whom he is a savior.
 
He has a hard time being president of Venezuela with most of the private broadcasters being right wing, US backed and deeply anti chavez. They broadcast many false reports about Chavez and his government has stopped renewing licenses.

and most TV broadcasters are leftwing in the U.S. Hell CBS faked Bush's service history in an election year but have they been shut down?

Charvez is thug and dictator who's contempt for democracy was made clear when he congratulated Ahmadinejad on his "election win". But I guess you also think he's been demonised :rolleyes:
 
Life is tough the old palace these days. My heart goes out to the poor b****. ag shame.

I think what upsets El Presidento most, is that the yanks virtually ignore him.
 
Thing about Chavez is that he came to power via a coup originally so I find it hard to reconcile this, Evo on the other hand won fairly and I have more respect for that dude.
 
Typical jihadi BS that we've learnt to expect from guess who ...........

Any enemy of the US is a friend of the jihadis .

Can see more of his posts going into the OT black hole.
 
Thing about Chavez is that he came to power via a coup originally so I find it hard to reconcile this, Evo on the other hand won fairly and I have more respect for that dude.

That isn't true. It was an attempted coup for which he served 2 years in prison, and the government that he had tried to oust, that of Carlos Andrés Pérez was a year later forced out of office by the supreme court due to corruption charges and misappropriation of $250 million.

The coup against a corrupt government made Chavez extremely popular among the middle and lower classes and he was ELECTED president by landslide in 1998.

He was also the victim of a CIA conducted coup in 2002 but was reinstated after 2 days due to a popular uprising.
 
AJE has a People and Power episode on Venezuela, not a very rosy picture...
 
I thought Chavez only had the support of about 50% of the population. I love the way he riles the USA, good on him. Someone needs to do it, might as well be him. I'm of the opinion that there needs to be a counter to US influence in Latin America. The USA is trying to boost its military presence in Colombia, something which has got the surrounding countries up in arms and is not at all surprising! He helps the poorest of the poor in his country, which is always something I have time to admire. Yes he also does a lot of controversial stuff too like muzzling the media, trying to extend his term indefinitely, etc. but I agree with the way he emphasizes education and stops the foreign exploitation of Venezuela's natural resources. There is a very good reason for so many Latin American countries electing leftist parties to government. They are sick and tired of making ill gains under America's vision of free trade agreements which only suit the USA. Long live Chavez and the revolution! Down with the imperialist United States of America. Those yanks need to be taken down a peg or two, I for one am tired of their biased agenda.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X