Illegal downloaders spend MORE on music than those who obey the law.

Shake&Bake

Party Liaison
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
22,258
Reaction score
1,882
Location
Cape Town
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 5:41 PM on 01st November 2009

People who illegally download music spend more on official releases than anyone else, according to a new survey.

The study, published today by think-tank Demos, found those who admit to file sharing spent an average £77 a year on singles and albums - £33 more than those who claim never to have wrongly accessed music for free.

Researcher Peter Bradwell said the findings should force companies and politicians to 'wake up to the changing nature' of the music industry as the Government plans to disconnect illegal downloaders from the internet in a 'three strikes and you're out' rule.

An estimated seven million UK users download files illegally every year, which will cost the industry £200million in 2009, according to trade association, the British Phonographic Industry.

Artists Lily Allen and James Blunt recently voiced support for the Government plans, while Latin pop star Shakira claims illegal file sharing brings her closer to her fans.

The survey also revealed nearly two thirds of file sharers said new and cheaper music services would encourage them to stop accessing illegal services. It found that by lowering the price of music available online to 45p per track - compared to between 59p and 99p on iTunes - providers could expect to double interest in legal sales.

Eight-three per cent of people downloading music illegally said they buy more music as a result, while 42 per cent said they did so to 'try before you buy'.

But the Government is pressing ahead with plans for harsher punishments to act as a deterrent.

A Digital Economy Bill is expected to be introduced to parliament later this month, with its draft promising to create a 'robust legal and regulatory framework to combat illegal file sharing'.

Mr Bradwell said: 'This research demonstrates that cutting file sharers off may not be the best solution for the Government if they are intent on helping the music industry.

'Politicians and music companies need to wake up to the changing nature of music consumption and embrace the demand for new business models that offer lower prices and easier access to music.'

A 1,008 people aged between 18 and 50 were quizzed last month for the survey.

A spokesman for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said: 'The scale of unlawful file-sharing poses a real threat to the long-term sustainability of our creative industries. The Government can not sit back and do nothing.

'While surveys asking people about unlawful behaviour should be treated with caution, it's encouraging that the findings signal that the three-pronged approach set out by the Government this week - a mix of education, enforcement and attractive new commercial deals - provides the best way forward for industry and consumers.'

/readies the popcorn
 
If there is some science in this and holds true, then as I have said before, the record labels need to be looking for innovative ways to make money out of file sharing or make certain tracks available gratis.

Attract people to sample their wares and they should buy. One of the problems is that music and movies are becoming way too expensive and they are pricing themselves away from the people who would otherwise be loyal. FAT CATS!!! :mad:

I probably spend more than the average on music and movies but I have found ways listening to the music before I buy it. And I don't want to put those filthy headphones on at Look n Listen to listen to an album!!!

/pass the salt and butter dudes! :D
 
this is what I have been saying all along. File Sharers are consumers. Sell them something cheap and reasonable and they will buy it.
 
I readily download music. It's the only way I can expand my horizons beyond the sh*te that is played on the radio (which I avoid listening to, cannot handle that crap). It doesn't stop me from buying CDs when I can afford to, especially if it's something I downloaded and really like. I spent R650 the other day buying CDs of music I downloaded and liked. Hell, if it was cheaper, I'd buy loads more.
 
Silly really how they are making a big deal out of P2P music sharing... these sort of things were going on long before the internet. It just used to involve physically popping around to your mate's house. Who has not copied a mate's music cassette at some point in their lives?

Damn, we even had those double tape decks to simplify the process. Why did they never ban those? What other use could they have besides copying music?

Politicians are always so out of touch with reality.
 
Concur with Gary and thisgeek - I also needed some retail therapy and spend R900-odd on music cd's/dvd's this weekend. All cd's were first DL'ed to test first. What I liked, I bought.
 
My problem is that most music I like, you can't buy locally. I could find one CD at a on-line store, but after having it in my wishlist for 2 months, I just deleted it. I will keep on listening to my mp3's, until I can actually find the CD's locally.

PS: Sharing is caring :p
 
Lock up all those people who download and buy - then they can cut their revenue streams more and hopefully one day Sony BMG/EMI etc will go out of business for good.
 
Oooh, interesting. So, filesharing actually encourages spending? Well, the same thing happens with anime as well, so it's not that surprising, but it's still interesting.
 
Simple - file sharing broadens horizons and people then support artists who deserve it.

How many bands/musicians/actors would you pay to watch/listen that you have discovered through sharing?
 
People share, we get that idea beaten into us from kindergarden when we forced to share toys.

I hear some great song and want my friends to like it as well so I give them a copy, back in the old days we use to do this by making mix tapes, dam back in the day when I could not afford music I use to make tapes from radio broadcasts(Man I hated it when some DJ would just not shut up)

Nothing changed. People still share, people that can afford it still buy, piracy is nothing new, its just now they have a way to see that its happening.
 
Well if they offered album as at say 20 bucks online, i can say without doubt i purchase the item.

Sadly not all of us can blow 500 bucks a month on 2 or 3 cd's but we can blow 800 bucks and download every album released.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X