This thought provoking article is sure to get lots of attention!!
http://kenrockwell.com/tech/death-of-photography.htm
http://kenrockwell.com/tech/death-of-photography.htm
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Especially with a sensationalist, yet irrelevant, title like that.This thought provoking article is sure to get lots of attention!!
http://kenrockwell.com/tech/death-of-photography.htm
Especially with a sensationalist, yet irrelevant, title like that.
I skimmed through most of this badly written article, only reading the 'today' and 'moral' bits. What's the point of his rant? there has always been bad amateurs (hobbyists as he calls them) in every profession. From the few mistaken visits to articles on his site in the past, he himself takes "awful pictureof weeds in someone's backyard" to illustrate a feature of some new camera or other photography paraphernalia.
Why does he stereotype the sexes? Why does he rant against people sitting at a computer, when his income is based upon sucking those people sitting at a computer in to donate to his website?
He rants for large format cameras, against DSLRs, and for point and shoots (well apparently just the Canon Powershot S90, judging by his linking). He rants against post production, and yet his hero, Ansel Adams, surely spent hours, if not days, working on each print in the dark room. He rants against multiple exposures, by using examples of documentary or journalism not being possible with multiple exposures - forgetting that hobbyists aren't photojournalists, and photojournos don't use HDR for news images.
/rant
The point I assume he is trying to make is valid. Shoot more, think more, plan more, spend less money and don't edit each picture (whether it is from a fashion shoot or little Timmy's birthday party) to the point where it looks like someone vomited pixels - are all valid points... which have been argued for decades by much better photographers, and indeed, writers.
The point of my rant? Don't bother reading his biased, money-seeking articles. There are much, much better photography related websites for those that don't spend each second shooting like the "pro's."
:wtf:
I agree with you. Whole lot of blah blah blah. The digital age has made photography more accessible and popular than ever before. That's good for everybody. The "bad" hobbyists may just be avid PS'ers now. So what? If you are able to take good photos it will stand out even more vividly in the crowd of voluminous mediocrity. Computers have given photography a new lease on life.
Did I follow correctly? Man went from photography to porn to photography again? :wtf:![]()
i have 3 wet plates here and 2 are kinda pornographic and one is a chinese beheading.
you're killing online pr0n...![]()
Here's what I learnt - Now that the only camera you'll ever need has been discontinued (his beloved D40) referral link sales are down. What to do? Create a new only camera you'll ever need - this time the S90 and while you're at it make sure his D40 sheeple - the people who bought into his nonsense the first time around - want one too. Sales are up and people can go back to supporting his growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem.I just hope the people on this forum are able to learn from it.
The only thing I miss about the UK - Burger King.
The only thing I miss about the UK - Burger King.![]()
I thought yours was far more eloquent.+1 bwana. You said it much better than I did.
Ken Rockwell makes my blood boil. :twisted:
I'll have to wait until March I'm afraid.A visit to the one pictured will cure that...![]()
You're more limited by your choice of device than you realise.Nice article. I have always said I am just as capable of taking a great photograph with my cellphone camera than someone with a R100,000 camera.
Which often requires a better camera.It is all about the subject and the composition!