UK Audit firm launches new arms deal probe

the354

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Messages
11,237
Reaction score
1,434
I really hope they manage to expose the ones involved. :)

The Accountancy and Actuarial Discipline Board (AADB) is to investigate KPMG, which advised BAE Systems on offshore companies that were used to pay "commissions" to influence the awarding of lucrative contracts in South Africa's R47.4-billion defence procurement package.

Controversial businessman Fana Hlongwane, who was an adviser to then-defence minister Joe Modise when the arms deal was initiated, will be a key figure in the latest probe.

It follows an investigation in the UK and Liechtenstein into alleged payments of more than R200-million by BAE to him.

The company, which has also been under investigation by Britain's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) since 2007 for issuing bribes in South Africa, recently "settled" a £286-million fine for failing to comply with global anti-bribery rules.

The boardhas initiated the latest probe after corruption cases related to the arms deal were mysteriously dropped by South Africa's Hawks unit in September.

The audit, which will involve scrutiny of KPMG's confidential records, is set to reveal substantial financial evidence - and disclose the names of influential individuals - who, in exchange for cash, helped BAE supply Hawk trainer aircraft and Gripen fighter jets to South Africa for $2.1-billion.

Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille said yesterday she would also be approaching the board to offer assistance, and would request a copy of its findings.

De Lille this week lodged a formal complaint with the public protector regarding the "politically motivated" decision to close the local investigation into corruption in the arms deal.

She is also pursuing a private prosecution of 28 "politically connected individuals" on whom she has evidence of having unlawfully benefited from the procurement programme.

Trade union federation Cosatu and the Democratic Alliance also welcomed the news, describing it as an "exciting new development".

They urged the government to co-operate if requested and to consider re-opening its investigation into the arms deal.

"As far as co-operation with foreign investigations is concerned, these are matters best dealt with at government-to-government level," said party spokesman Brian Sokutu.

The board is investigating KPMG's audits between 1997 and 2007, relating to commissions paid by BAE to third-party agents and outside companies in major arms deals.

AADB spokesman Jonathan Labrey this week declined to comment, other than to say that the investigation was the result of the SFO's probe into BAE's practices in South Africa.

The SFOobtained signed affidavits in 2008 regarding bank statements which showed that the arms company paid £115-million to advisers "to assist in the securing and maintaining of the Hawk and Gripen contract" with South Africa and other countries.

According to the AADB, "BAE set up a system of offshore, anonymous companies to funnel payments around the world. Two of them were in the British Virgin Islands tax haven."

Among these is Red Diamond Trading, which was investigated over a series of payments made through it, including £70-million distributed to agents in SA.

In addition to these payments, the AADB said it would probe KPMG's advice to BAE on the operation of offshore companies, including Red Diamond Trading, Poseidon Trading Investments and Novelmight.

The AADB declined to confirm whether it was investigating Arstow, another offshore company set up by BAE Systems, which paid out more than R53-million.

In March, the Sunday Times reported that allegations contained in secret court documents, including a 106-page affidavit from deputy director of public prosecutions Billy Downer, detailed how Hlongwane was effectively paid £4.9-million between October 1999 and July 2001 by Arstow.

Hlongwane could not be reached for comment despite numerous attempts. Lindsay Walls, a spokesman for BAE, declined to comment.

KPMG spokesman Gavin Houlgate said the company would be "co-operating fully with the AADB".

David Maynier, the DA's defence and military spokesman said: "The AADB investigation is an exciting new development. It may provide a way back into the arms deal.

"We are in the process of applying for all documents relating to the arms deal investigation."

Hawk's boss Anwar Dramat had told parliament in September that it would cost too much to pursue the investigation into corruption in the arms deal.

He said that there were 460 boxes of documents and 4.7 million computer- generated documents relating to the arms deal in his possession.

On Friday, Hawks spokesman Colonel Lindela Mashingo reiterated that the arms deal investigation was closed, adding that his office was not aware of the latest investigation.

Asked whether the Hawks would co-operate with the AABD if it requested access to documents, Mashingo said: "Due consideration will be given to assisting ... as and when approached."

Standing Committee on Public Accounts chairman Themba Godi yesterday said: "I have written to the Hawks seeking a detailed explanation ... for their decision. It is on the basis of their response that we will decide on a way forward."

http://www.timeslive.co.za/sundaytimes/article748731.ece/UK-Audit-firm-launches-new-arms-deal-probe

LOL! The Sunday Times will definately be the first Newspaper muzzled when the new laws are passed.
 
LOL! The Sunday Times will definately be the first Newspaper muzzled when the new laws are passed.

I hope so, there'll be a massive fight if government does try. It'll go to constitutional courts and I'd be confident that the Times will win or at the least expose any "muzzling" which defeats the point. The ANC probably know this too so hopefully they won't even try.
 
The ANC probably know this too so hopefully they won't even try.

Don’t rely on this. The ANC know zip and it’s the sort of retarded action that they would take. After all, it’s only the poor, abused sodding taxpayer who will foot the bill for their stalling tactic. And they will try – it’s a stall, bog-down, create confusion and a method of causing the outraged citizen to go wall-eyed with boredom at constant remands, delays and foot dragging over censorship and the arms deal. The heat will die-down if they can spin it out long enough. Watch this space.
 
The $hit will hit the proverbial fan when Madiba's name crops up.......

I also think he is not as squeaky clean as all imagine. My respect for him has dwindled to such low levels since his presidency. He stands back and watches all the corruption in government without an opinion... I smells a rat ?
 
It boggles my mind how a company like BAE Systems still has its doors open for business. Its regularly implicated in this type of stuff, with Tony Blair coming to its rescue at one point with Saudi Arabia being the customer in that case. And the Brits just let them off the hook, EVERY time! :wtf:

The company, which has also been under investigation by Britain's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) since 2007 for issuing bribes in South Africa, recently "settled" a £286-million fine for failing to comply with global anti-bribery rules.

This sentence is a bit vague, but was the fine related to the SA deal or was the statement just to link their history to the context in the article?
 
It boggles my mind how a company like BAE Systems still has its doors open for business. Its regularly implicated in this type of stuff, with Tony Blair coming to its rescue at one point with Saudi Arabia being the customer in that case. And the Brits just let them off the hook, EVERY time! :wtf:
Apparently this sort of stuff is the norm in the defence industry...
 
Headline and article do not match? How does "KPMG being investigated" = "Audit firm launches new probe"?
 
The story of ‘The feast of the Uninvited’ comes to mind. Looks like a frenzy of corruption and helping myself.
Most of these beneficiaries would be leaving the country soon, to avoid being arrested and booked,
 
Apparently this sort of stuff is the norm in the defence industry...

Yeah. I am not well-versed in business but I thought this was unnecessarily ruthless (no links).

The SA Rooivalk helicopter was considered superior to the American Apache helicopter. The idea would have been to purchase the Rooivalk and install the Apache combat suite. Military helicopters need a formidable combat suite. Rooivalk sales did badly because the electronic combat suite of the Rooivalk was inferior to the Apache one, and the Americans wouldn’t allow their electronics in the Rooivalk. The American government got involved. You bought Apache or lost out. SA’s nascent aviation industry went belly-up. American blackmail.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X