George Bush memoirs claim waterboarding 'torture' stopped attacks in London

Nom Chompsky

High Tory
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
54,617
Reaction score
39,468
Location
Cape Town
Good on President Bush. I know many people are not fans of him and I disagree with some of his policies as well, but for this, he is right. I don't really care how people get information from known terrorists - it is important to me that information is obtained. In a perfect world, torture would not need to be used, but these terrorists don't play by the rules and will use any means necessary to avoid telling their captors important information.

America's use of waterboarding to interrogate suspected terrorists saved British lives by stopping attacks on Heathrow and Canary Wharf, George W Bush claims in a new book.

In his memoirs, the former U.S. president defended the technique, rejected by the British government as torture.

In an interview today, Mr Bush also praises Tony Blair as his closest ally but is dismissive about British public opinion about the war in Iraq.

Ending two years of public silence since he left the White House, Mr Bush said three suspects were waterboarded to provide information about the plots.

‘Their interrogations helped break up plots to attack American diplomatic families abroad, Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf in London, and multiple targets in the United States,’ he writes in Decision Points, published in the U.S. today.

Mr Bush also claims in the book that he ordered a plan to be drawn up for a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

He admits that he authorised the use of waterboarding on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-confessed architect of the September 11 attacks, calling his decision ‘damn right’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ure-stopped-attacks-London.html#ixzz14obtQaMS
 
Nice that he managed to stop the attack but you have to wonder how many the same acts have initiated.
 
Nice that he managed to stop the attack but you have to wonder how many the same acts have initiated.

Correct me if I'm wrong but there has been:

- one major attack on the US
- one major attack in the UK
- one major attack in Spain

since 2001. I think that is a pretty good record too be honest, considering that there have been many more failed bombing attempts publicised in the media (and that's only the ones that we know about). One can be assured that MI6 and CIA have worked on far more cases than we know about.
 
You are forgetting about the hundreds of major attacks in Afghanistan, Iraq etc all a direct result of the bismal war campaign
 
I could give a rats a$$ about those countries.
Good for him on what he did against terror.
He had balls and took the fight to them.
Now we have a new leader who just wants to be friends with all the terrorists :rolleyes:
 
Well if anything Obama has stepped up the war in Afghanistan so I don't see how you can say that.
 
He has, I have no problem with the US attacking the enemies that attacked them but Bush cocked it up with Iraq and the end result is countries that were better off without 'freedom'.
 
stink bomb (rem science class. gosh that will make me tel anything)
 
I have no problem with water boarding on known terrorists... but I have a problem with the veracity or accuracy of information obtained by this method. Surely people will be willing to make up any old story to avoid torture?
 
I am really glad that ****** never bombed iran's nuclear sites :eek:

What a complete and utter idiot, didn't they look stupid enough when they found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? How Americans voted him in for a second term is beyond me although thinking about it it makes sense that they would have.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X