Perhaps we could have a poll to see who's happy with the CellC offerings as announced and who's still serious about changing over to CellC?
To start the ball rolling on this topic I'll start by saying that I'm very disappointed with today's news. To me the critical factor in making CellC a viable alternative would have been affordable top-up pricing. I'm not going to get good mileage out of even 5Gb, especially at the higher speeds. And before anyone says you can't have your cake and eat it (or fast connections AND good bundle pricing) I'd say that I was rather hoping that might be the start of good things to come from CellC.
As it stands, I'll settle for slower connections (3.6) with more affordable bundles so it looks like I'll be with VC for a while yet. And that's why I'm so angry today. Those guys at VC must be smiling broadly today, knowing some of us won't be leaving just yet.
Dammit! Why do we always have to end up having to choose the "least bad" supplier, rather than having a "best" option?
To start the ball rolling on this topic I'll start by saying that I'm very disappointed with today's news. To me the critical factor in making CellC a viable alternative would have been affordable top-up pricing. I'm not going to get good mileage out of even 5Gb, especially at the higher speeds. And before anyone says you can't have your cake and eat it (or fast connections AND good bundle pricing) I'd say that I was rather hoping that might be the start of good things to come from CellC.
As it stands, I'll settle for slower connections (3.6) with more affordable bundles so it looks like I'll be with VC for a while yet. And that's why I'm so angry today. Those guys at VC must be smiling broadly today, knowing some of us won't be leaving just yet.
Dammit! Why do we always have to end up having to choose the "least bad" supplier, rather than having a "best" option?