Telkom to make local-loop investment despite unbundling risk

MaD

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2003
Messages
4,929
Reaction score
16
Telkom to make local-loop investment despite unbundling risk

Despite rising pressure to unbundle the local loop in a bid to increase domestic fixed-lined telecoms competition once the second network operator (SNO) is licensed, incumbent monopoly Telkom is moving ahead with plans to shorten the distance from exchange-to-customer as part of efforts to improve the ADSL user experience.

Owing to geographical and legacy-installation factors, South Africa has a relatively long local loop of about 5,5 km, which compares unfavourably to a number countries in Europe, for instance, where the copper-wire loop from the exchange to the end user is closer to 2 km.

The overlay investment to deliver broadband-over-copper is, therefore, less effective, leading to lower-quality ADSL delivery and greater customer dissatisfaction.

Chief Operating Officer Reuben September tells Engineering News that Telkom is well aware of this shortcoming and is finalising a shortlist of contractors to support its loop-shortening ambitions using fibre and other technologies.

“We are in the process of selecting suppliers for the concept, and, as is normally the case, we are likely to select more than one supplier as part of our risk-mitigation policy. When we select the suppliers, it will not be on price alone, but also on their record elsewhere in the world,” September reveals, adding that the tender has been developed for the concept as a whole rather than for a specific project.

No specific budget has been set aside for the initiative, with projects to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and delivered in line with customer demand.

It is likely that high-density-demand areas will be the first beneficiaries, as Telkom is likely to build the investment case around what it calls 'centres of gravity', where lease-line facilities or data networks are already deployed.

September admits that proposals to accelerate the unbundling of the local loop raises the associated risks, but points out that current legislation only provides for local-loop unbundling two years after the SNO has been licensed. There is mounting pressure, though, to bring that liberalisation forward.

“Nonetheless, we have taken the decision to move ahead for the sake of our customers and our shareholders. We have decided not to be distracted by the fact that we might be creating a greater opportunity for competition in the future as we have to do what we have to do for the business,” September avers.

Should this capital investment be made, users can anticipate higher-speed and higher-quality ADSL delivery, while Telkom hopes to accelerate broadband penetration and reduce customer dissatisfaction.

The company has set an internal target of 15% to 20% broadband penetration, which is lower than developed-economy norms of 25%, but well up on the current two-per-cent level.

It is also seeking to lessen its revenue dependence on voice as new fixed and mobile solutions eat into that market and has set its sights on an expanded share of the data market.

ADSL will be at the forefront of these efforts, with Telkom considering a range of options to lower the costs of the offering.

CEO Papi Molotsane indicates that the company has noted that the ADSL market is highly 'price elastic', and that it will, therefore, continue to pursue competitively-priced offerings, one of these being a lower-cost self-install package. In the six months to September 30, ADSL services surged by 161% to 95 290, and the utility has set a target of 750 000 to 1-million ADSL installations within the next three years.
 
ADSL will be at the forefront of these efforts, with Telkom considering a range of options to lower the costs of the offering.
Yeah, right! And what portion of the price are they going to raise to maintain profits? :confused:
 
i really think SNO should do their thing wirelessly - leave telkom alone - let them sink!
 
MaD said:
ADSL will be at the forefront of these efforts, with Telkom considering a range of options to lower the costs of the offering.

The next offer 100Mb per month since not too many people can use 3Gb
 
And this makes Telkom's threat of dropping the ADSL service even more laughable.
 
ic said:
Basically what this means, is that Telkodemonopoly will be putting Hauwei Mini DSLAMs into the blue&green roadside distrobution boxes, which means copper from customer premisis to d/b, and fibre from d/b to exchange. So the copper distance is reduced and replaced by fibre [for the longer haul to exchange].

Actually, this is a rather positive development - and one which should have been done years ago. If I read correct, it will allow ADSL for all those people who have optical fibre exchanges.
 
One thing that bothers me is they mention the 2 yr restriction and brush off the LLU. Do they know something we don't ? Did they bring it up to the DoC ? So they want to move to make more money from data service.. but i'm thinking their plans are based on them owning the incoming data/saix. Can they survive without saix ? I think if incoming international link was a private company we'd have a hell of alot different scenario with their products and perhaps this move. Dang anyone know what the sno will do regarding this ? I mean if they can't get it from another source.. we ain't geting cheaper bandwith just perhaps cheaper rental.
 
Moederloos said:
Actually, this is a rather positive development - and one which should have been done years ago. If I read correct, it will allow ADSL for all those people who have optical fibre exchanges.

Agreed, but when I hear 'positive' and 'Telkom' in the same sentence I always smell something weird. Could it be that Telkom are quite sure that local loop will not be unbundled any time in the near future? I wouldn't be surprised, after all the goverment is in bed with Telkom /end of conspiracy theory/
 
*sigh* In the hands of any other country, I'd say this was a positive move. In the hands of Telkom, I'd say we're in for a ****storm.
 
krycor said:
So they want to move to make more money from data service.. but i'm thinking their plans are based on them owning the incoming data/saix. Can they survive without saix ?

But SAIX IS Telkom. Telkom IS SAIX

They are one and the same.
 
yes .. this sounds way too fishy .... no way will telskum invest in the local loop if they thought for a moment that it was going to be unbundled .... yup .. the DoC has lied to us AGAIN ... surprise ... surprise
 
bekdik said:
But SAIX IS Telkom. Telkom IS SAIX

They are one and the same.

I know.. but if push came to shove and it was forced to be either a seperate company(compl) or int access was managed by a sperate company etc
 
I am affraid that even as this is a good idea, this might be a strategy by Telkom to convince DoC that they still have costs to recover from local loop and need LLU to be delayed.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X