Social networks might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom

A

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,474
Reaction score
2,588
It is a truth universally acknowledged that information technology—in particular social networking through the Internet—is changing the global balance of power. The “Facebook Generation” has already been credited with the overthrow of the Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak. For a brief period, the darling of Tahrir Square was the young Google executive Wael Ghonim.

Yet there is another side to the story. It is not only proponents of democracy who know how to exploit the power of online networking. It is also the enemies of freedom.

Ask yourself: just how did the murderous mob in Mazar-e Sharif find out about the burning of a Quran in Florida? Look no further than the Internet and the mobile phone. Since 2001 cell-phone access in Afghanistan has leapt from zero to 30 percent.

Or consider the fact that, before Facebook took down a page called “Third Palestinian Intifada”—which proclaimed that “Judgment Day will be brought upon us only once the Muslims have killed all of the Jews”—it had notched 350,000 “likes.”

It seems paradoxical. In Samuel Huntington’s version of the post–Cold War world, there was going to be a clash between an Islamic civilization that was stuck in a medieval time warp and a Western civilization that was essentially equivalent to modernity. What we’ve ended up with is something more like a mashup of civilizations, in which the most militantly antimodern strains of Islam are being channeled by the coolest technology the West has to offer.

Here’s a good example. According to the Jihadica website, there is now a special data package produced by the “Mobile Detachment” of the “al-Ansar al-Mujahideen Forum” especially for cell phones. Users can download encryption software, pictures, and 3GP-format video clips with titles like “A Martyr Eulogizing Another Martyr” by the Somalia-based Harakat al-Shabab al-Mujahideen. Also available to users is the electronic magazine al-Sumud (“Resistance”) published by the Afghan branch of the Taliban, and edifying documents—available in both MS Word and Adobe formats—like “How to Prepare for Your Afterlife.” Killer apps, indeed.

Then there is Inspire, the online magazine published by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and aimed at aspiring jihadists in the West. In addition to bomb-making instructions, it also publishes target lists of individuals against whom fatwas have been proclaimed.

No one should pretend that these messages do not find receptive ears. In May 2010 Roshonara Choudhry stabbed the British M.P. Stephen Timms after having watched 100 hours of extremist sermons by Yemeni-American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. Where did she find these sermons? On YouTube, of course. Al-Awlaki’s other followers include the Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan, the Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, and the Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad.

In short, Google’s pro-democracy Wael Ghonim is probably a less significant figure than Fouad X, the head of IT for Hizbullah in Lebanon, who tells Joshua Ramo (at the beginning of his superb book The Age of the Unthinkable) that “our email is flooded with CVs” from Islamist geeks wanting to “serve a sacred cause.”

So far, so bad. Now here’s the real problem. Many of these same Islamist geeks (among them Al-Awlaki) have hailed the so-called Arab Spring as a golden opportunity. The March 29 issue of Inspire declared: “The revolutions that are shaking the thrones of dictators are good for the Muslims, good for the mujahideen, and bad for the imperialists of the West and their henchmen in the Muslim world.”

The clash of civilizations would have been easy for the West to win if it had simply pitted the ideas and institutions of the 21st century against those of the seventh. No such luck. In the new mash of civilizations, our most dangerous foes are the Islamists who understand how to post fatwas on Facebook, email the holy Quran, and tweet the call to jihad.
Click to expand...

http://www.newsweek.com/2011/04/10/the-mash-of-civilizations.html

Eish 350 000 people. So much for an insignificant minority :wtf:
 
Or consider the fact that, before Facebook took down a page called “Third Palestinian Intifada”—which proclaimed that “Judgment Day will be brought upon us only once the Muslims have killed all of the Jews”—it had notched 350,000 “likes.”
Click to expand...

Eeeh *gulp*
 
While I think that social networking is one of the greatest communication platforms in history there is a huge problem in terms of auditable numbers. Groups trying to gain support by using likes and member status can be easily manipulated by single users created multiple accounts.
 
/tinfoil hat

yes nasty government agencies like MOSSAD could create a fake FB page and spam it with fake user "likes" thereby making the impression there's a large number of fanatics when there really is not.
 
Huh? I was thinking those supporting the movement would be more responsible.
 
In related news:

Telephones might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Faxes might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Email might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Cars might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Houses might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
 
w1z4rd said:
In related news:

Telephones might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Faxes might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Email might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Cars might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Houses might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Click to expand...

lol good post
 
w1z4rd said:
In related news:

Telephones might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Faxes might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Email might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Cars might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Houses might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Click to expand...

:D
 
w1z4rd said:
In related news:

Telephones might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Faxes might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Email might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Cars might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Houses might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Click to expand...

Brilliant!! :D:D:D
 
w1z4rd said:
In related news:

Telephones might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Faxes might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Email might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Cars might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Houses might promote democracy, but they also empower the enemies of freedom.
Click to expand...

+ 1 (Now if only you could be this consistant more often... I kid...I kid... :D )

Actually it deserves more than a +1, simple and elegant way of effectively and utterly refuting the point that was attempted to be made.

Pity the debate about the internet and how to control it will probably be around for years to come.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X