MCI ‘irked' about SAT-3 exclusion

bekdik

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
12,860
Reaction score
20
Location
I exist only in my own mind ...
http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/tel...sp?A=AFN&S=All Africa News&O=E&CiRestriction=

25 November 2005
All Africa News Internet


MCI ‘irked' about SAT-3 exclusion



BY PAUL VECCHIATTO, ITWEB CAPE TOWN CORRESPONDENT


[Cape Town | ITWeb, 25 November 2005] - A strong regulator is essential for the development of a strong and competitive telecommunications market, says Daniel Crawford, MCI's president for international and wholesale services.

Crawford, the most senior of the US telecommunications conglomerate's representatives to visit SA, was in the country to cement the sale of the 30% stake in local subsidiary UUNet to black economic empowerment investment firm Jay & Jay.

advertisement


“The role of the regulator where there is a dominant monopoly is to ensure it does not abuse its power,” he says.

Speaking to ITWeb in Cape Town, Crawford says MCI's experiences in other countries show that once “fair and equitable” access is given to international landing sites for telecommunications links, such as the SAT-3 undersea cable, then the market opens up for his and other companies to invest further in order to compete effectively.

“We are not looking for a free ride. In India, VNSL controls the landing point, but the government there has mandated that free and equitable access must be given to other players. We are happy to pay for the use of the facility and we are able to deliver our products and services there,” he says.

The opening up of the international landing points, controlled by Telkom, has been the subject of heated debate recently in industry and government with the latter proposing to declare them an essential service, which would open them up for use by other companies.

MCI owns 23% of the consortium that controls the SAT-3 cable.

“We are irked that we are not able to access our own facility,” Crawford says.

He says the deal with Jay & Jay is seen as a necessity to help shore up UUNet's position in the market.

“The deal removes a pre-qualifying obstacle should we want to bid for various business. This means that our bids can be judged on an economic basis,” he says.

According to Crawford, MCI examined a list of about 18 potential suitors for UUNet, and settled on Jay & Jay because it had the market experience and the money to do the deal. He would not disclose the value of the transaction.

He acknowledges that a company headed by a former minister of communications (Jay Naidoo) is useful as he would know the industry and the situation.

“It is not unusual to see well educated people moving between government and industry in a small country. For instance, some of our previous employees now hold senior positions in Mexico,” Crawford says.
 
"Speaking to ITWeb in Cape Town, Crawford says MCI's experiences in other countries show that once “fair and equitable” access is given to international landing sites for telecommunications links, such as the SAT-3 undersea cable, then the market opens up for his and other companies to invest further in order to compete effectively."
Gee, this sounds like exactly the opposite of the standard li(n)e we keep hearing from the likes of Telkom and Vodacom, i.e. that no company will want to invest in telecomms if they aren't 'ensured' gigantic returns.
 
JAY NAIDOO!!??!!! :eek:

Shoulda seen that one coming! ROFL! The more things change the more they stay the same. Wonder if he will be able to pull strings to ge the access they require? Will be interesting to see...
 
He acknowledges that a company headed by a former minister of communications (Jay Naidoo) is useful as he would know the industry and the situation.

FFS! When will people realise that most of the peeps in SAfrican ministries are just clowns and political appointments? Look at our present minister of communications!

Any person with half a brain can translate what this man said in Bulldustianese to plain English: "He acknowledges that a company headed by a former minister of communications (Jay Naidoo) is useful as he would have the necessary political connections!

/me just shakes his head.

Free and fair access is however (despite the Bulldustianese that was rambled off in this article) worthy of striving for!
 
Tata is also a shareholder in SAFE/SAT3, and I assumed that that would allow them to compete with Telkom. Reading between the lines, it looks like they will not be able to use it either.
 
Here's what Jay said (1999)

So as we discuss this momentous advance of our civilization and the emergence of a digital world economy,
let us consider that this connectivity is the greatest equalizer in the world.
But in this very world that we live in, half of humanity has never used a telephone.
Yet, that access could catapult, could leapfrog the remotest rural community of this world
into the leading edge of this new economy.


Jay was Minister of Posts and Telegraphs in 1996.
The man behind the making of the current Telecommunications Act and
the man deeply involved in privatising telkom, SBC and of course maintaining the monopoly laws.

Jay also made frequent trips to Malaysia at the time.

talk is indeed cheap..

still interested ? Jay goes on
Therefore, what we have to do as leaders of the world --
especially the leaders of the most powerful nations in the world --
is put those values in, put in the soul, put in the energy,
put in the type of connectivity that brings those billions of people that stand outside
this great technological innovation of the Internet,
to bring those children into our vision of connectivity.


Here he lost himself completely :
So what we require today is the new leadership for a new thousand years that lie ahead,
and a vision able to take that world that is excluded into the mainstream of technological developments.
And in Africa, we are trying to do that.
In South Africa, we have revolutionized our infrastructure.
In the next five years, 75 percent of households will have access to a telephone
that will have a digital, fiber-optic, high-speed, broadband backbone capable of delivering all
the applications of electronic commerce, but also capable of delivering telemedicine and distance education.
We will have linked every city, every town, every village, every school, every clinic, library,
community center and police station to a network.
And at the end of that line, you could have a computer, a fax machine or a telephone.

http://www.govtech.net/magazine/visions/may99vision/jaynaidoo/jaynaidoo.php
 
Last edited:
Jay was one of the main architects of today’s disaster.
This chap should never be allowed to influence anything when it comes to telecommunications in this country.
Jay, go away.
 
Sneeky said:
Jay was one of the main architects of today’s disaster.
This chap should never be allowed to influence anything when it comes to telecommunications in this country.
Jay, go away.

Jay Naidoo.

He was also the Minister without Portfolio as well.
Seems he was right up in the front carriage of the gravy train.
 
So the way I'm reading this is that Jay Naidoo, who helped draft the Telecommunications Act, is responsible for MCI not being able to access its share of SAT3 in the first place?

MCI - you're supposed to bribe the minister while he's in office.

On the bright side - I've just found a new example to define irony.
 
This is why decisions in government are so hard to make and take so long,
cause they gotta figure out how to best design things for the day and the future -
most seem to get it right - seems like Jay did not.

But Jay knows all the ins and outs - MCI chose him - perhaps he's got a trick
up his sleeve - not for our benefit mind you.

I think we going to hear some more sweet talk from him soon :)
 
Probably MCI will bring WTO in to play -
essential services must be opened up and these include SAT3 and local loop.

Currently SA government is in breach of WTO's Basic Telecommunications Agreement it signed
and there's presssure on the government to reign in Telkom :


Last year (2000), the United States government threatened on behalf of AT&T Global Networks in South Africa,
to bring an action at the World Trade Organization ("WTO") in the basis that SA was allegedly contravening
its commitments under the WTO instruments to open its markets to competition in certain service sectors


Seems like Jay knows what he's doing and of course he's probably going to make a lot of money with MCI, much like telkom did with SBC.

http://www.ispa.org.za/regcom/advisories/advisory6.shtml
 
Last edited:
Give the MelkosStrand Landing Station to Telkom.

BUT

Give the Mtunzini Landing Station to MCI/UUNET/SNOTATA/VSNL

Then lets start a Poll.

Which ISP,s will have better internet connectivity
 
maybe they can finally push the gov to do it, cause right now pigs have better chances of flying.
 
Correct me if im wrong, but i seem to remember reading in an ITWEB/Internet Solutions book on convergence that Telkom's (Sat-3 Shareholder agreement) based monopoly on the cable ends sometime in 2006? I think that is what TATA is banking on for their decision to join the SNO partnership
 
I bet the April 2007 meeting will be a stormy one. Originally, Telkom monopoly over landing rights in SA meant nothing to the other shareholders in SAT3, but now they wish to compete in SA and Telkom says "No".

What is Tata, MCI shareholder percentage in SAT3?
 
pimal3 said:
I bet the April 2007 meeting will be a stormy one. Originally, Telkom monopoly over landing rights in SA meant nothing to the other shareholders in SAT3, but now they wish to compete in SA and Telkom says "No".
There's no problem really, they'll simply fix prices and ALL make literally truckloads of money.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X