Former Republican Economic Adviser: Raise Tax Rates

Geriatrix

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
6,554
Reaction score
3
Location
Right here
http://deductivepolitics.com/2011/07/27/former-republican-economic-adviser-raise-tax-rates/
Today Bruce Bartlett, the former assistant secretary for economic policy at the Treasury Department under George H.W. Bush and senior policy analyst under Ronald Reagan, asserted that the debt crisis that currently faces our country can be attributed to the lack of government revenue. He said:

“When [George W.] Bush took office, we had a debt of about $6 trillion and the projections from the CBO were that we were going to run about a $6 trillion surplus. So, by this point, if we had done nothing we would have paid off the debt … The Republicans keep saying that tax cuts are the key to prosperity but the 2000s are evidence that that’s not true … I don’t think there’s any question that we would have positive economic effects if we went back to the Clinton era tax rates.”

Those are not words from Dennis Kucinich, Rachel Maddow, or Bill Maher. Those are the words from a man who has served as an adviser to Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Ron Paul. Yes even one of Ron Paul’s crewmen thinks that this debt crisis is due to a lack of revenue. You can watch his interview with Chris Matthew here: (See site for video)

In fact, it is estimated that had we stuck with the economic policies put forth by President Clinton, we could have a $2.3 trillion surplus today. Unfortunately, over the last 10 years, our debt has increased with $3 trillion coming from the Bush tax cuts, $1.4 trillion coming from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and an additional $2.6 trillion throughout the Bush administration.

Today, the White House released an infographic detailing what exactly makes up our government’s debt (click to enlarge):
(See site for pic)
 
Those are the words from a man who has served as an adviser to Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Ron Paul. Yes even one of Ron Paul’s crewmen thinks that this debt crisis is due to a lack of revenue.

Bartlett is a Beltway opportunist. He flip-flops on a dime if it gets him into the "cool" crowd of expanding power and influence. His views over the past two decades have no consistency whatsoever. You might as well ask a Magic 8-Ball for an economics opinion compared to this floozy.

Now that the ad hominem is out of the way, I can restate the absurdity of believing that if marginal rates get raised or loop-holes get closed this will make any real dent. It must be realized that taxation costs a lot of money to actually enforce and raising the extortion requirements only incentivizes people to devote resources to gypping the system even more. Never mind that the U.S.'s fiscal problems extend well beyond the paltry $2 trillion annual Federal budget or even the $14 trillion national debt to the funamental matter that the government has made lavish promises to its citizens in the forms of subsidies and entitlements that are hopelessly unsustainable into the near future. Ponzi schemes cannot be bailed out. Eventually, they'll run out of road to kick the can down; high tax rates or not.
 
Last edited:
man the BS-O-Meter is actually doing loops with this...

Quoting a Ron Paul advisor now because what he says suits you :erm:

Anyway those numbers are all pulled out of their backside. The wars cost $1.4 trillion I thought it was$3 Trillion make up your mind. I like how Afghanistan is now all Bush's war as if dems and Obama never supported it. :o

Also like how Clinton is credited for economic policies drawn up by Republican congressmen.

Lastly even if you were dumb enough to take those numbers at face value Bush added $ 7 Trillion dollars of debt. The debt is $14 Trillion dollars so where did that other $ 7trillion dollars come from? Yes that's right Obama and the democrats added in under 3 years what Bush supposedly added in 8. Well done
 
Last edited:
man the BS-O-Meter is actually doing loops with this...

Quoting a Ron Paul advisor now because what he says suits you :erm:

Anyway those numbers are all pulled out of their backside. The wars cost $1.4 trillion I thought it was$3 Trillion make up your mind. I like how Afghanistan is now all Bush's war as if dems and Obama never supported it. :o

Also like how Clinton is credited for economic policies drawn up by Republican congressmen.

Lastly even if you were dumb enough to take those numbers at face value Bush added $ 7 Trillion dollars of debt. The debt is $14 Trillion dollars so where did that other $ 7trillion dollars come from? Yes that's right Obama and the democrats added in under 3 years what Bush supposedly added in 8. Well done
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images...editorial_graph2/24editorial_graph2-popup.gif
:D
 
Yeah we've seen Obama's magical abilities to bend the laws of mathematics...

Obama seeks record $708 billion in 2011 defence budget


Setting records for expenditure yet Obama is credited with $126 Billion in defence savings. The term "creative accounting" comes to mind lol

Stupidity knows no bounds. People will believe any BS :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X