Two US telecoms giants want to come together to thwart smaller ones

antowan

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 1, 2003
Messages
13,172
Reaction score
299
Location
Unknown
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/06/b...&en=eaaef06a5683b023&ei=5094&partner=homepage

The AT&T Corporation, in announcing plans yesterday to buy BellSouth Corporation for $67 billion after months of speculation, took the offensive against low-cost rivals in the free-for-all for phone, wireless and television customers.

With cable providers and technology companies entering the phone business, the former Baby Bells starting to sell television programming and more and more services available on mobile phones and on the Internet, companies like AT&T are trying to bulk up and turn themselves into one-stop shops for all communications needs.

"We literally have hundreds of competitors coming in every day; it's nothing like the old days," said Edward E. Whitacre, Jr., the chairman and chief executive of AT&T, the country's largest phone company. "If we're going to have the strength to compete, we better get our companies together."

The new company, with $120 billion in sales, about 317,000 workers and 71 million local phone customers in 22 states, would recreate a big chunk of the former AT&T monopoly that was broken up a generation ago. With the deal, only three Baby Bells would remain: AT&T, the former SBC Communications that provided service in the Southwest and elsewhere; Qwest and Verizon, the $90 billion company which is AT&T's chief rival. The latter two might now face renewed pressure to build themselves up.
 
Now the whole story around forcing content providers like Google to pay for network infrastructure upkeep becomes clearer.

If the US isn't careful a new monopoly might be on the horizon...
 
What i'm scared for in the american sense is the high amount of lobbyists that the telco's have voicing their "Need to charge for content" agenda's in congress.
A while ago a study showed that all the telco's had a crapper load of lobbyists and the software guys (google, yahoo) only had 1.

The crappy thing is that laws seem to get made by the amount of lobbying you can do over there.

Now with at&t merging again to form this megatelco it's quite evident that the pressure their going to be exerting is gonna force a lot of small companies out of business.
 
antowan said:
Now the whole story around forcing content providers like Google to pay for network infrastructure upkeep becomes clearer.

If the US isn't careful a new monopoly might be on the horizon...
Explains why - if the rumors are true - google has been buying up dark fiber like mad.
 
If the telco's get it right they effectively have a double income from a single asset.
User pays a monthly fee to use the pipe and now the provider has to pay to provide the data over the pipe.

User====telco pipe=====provider(google)

The crappy thing is that if they get it right the whole world's telco's will sit up an say......."Hmmmm that's a nice bit of profit we can make here"

Meanwhile were sitting with the problem that the telco decided that all traffic that it doesn't like must get shaped out.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X