South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Loads of people on Twitter calling for him to not be selected for England while the trial is ongoing, asking him to return his armband etc...
They didn't ask for Gerrard to not be available for England when he was on trial... what's the difference?
Well, Terry is a monkey
meh! Hope all goes well.
I'd rather have a "monkey" in my team than scum.
Loads of people on Twitter calling for him to not be selected for England while the trial is ongoing, asking him to return his armband etc...
They didn't ask for Gerrard to not be available for England when he was on trial... what's the difference?
Because the FA also knew that the public prosecutor would laugh at them due to lack of evidence or witnesses. The law does not entertain "he said, I said" type of "evidence".Why wasn't Suarez charged, or at least investigated by officers as well?
Well, Terry is a monkey
Because the FA also knew that the public prosecutor would laugh at them due to lack of evidence or witnesses. The law does not entertain "he said, I said" type of "evidence".
In JT's case there are several witnesses (watch the video clip).
So lip reading is acceptable in UK courts?Because the FA also knew that the public prosecutor would laugh at them due to lack of evidence or witnesses. The law does not entertain "he said, I said" type of "evidence".
In JT's case there are several witnesses (watch the video clip).
That might be where the complaint originated, but JT made his alleged comments in a group of players in the goal mouth area (watch the video), hence there are witnesses.So lip reading is acceptable in UK courts?